Retention Reimagined: Participatory Action and Positive Deviancy for University Student Success

A. Nakonechnyi, Brook Batch, N. Douglas, Ciara Tucker, Alexa Theuerling, Matthew Knox, Rebecca Allen
{"title":"Retention Reimagined: Participatory Action and Positive Deviancy for University Student Success","authors":"A. Nakonechnyi, Brook Batch, N. Douglas, Ciara Tucker, Alexa Theuerling, Matthew Knox, Rebecca Allen","doi":"10.35844/001c.94415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"About half of U.S. university students who start their degrees never finish — higher education retention is a pressing problem that has remained stagnant since the 1960s. This article highlights strategies for conducting research on undergraduate retention done by and with undergraduates themselves. This article’s context is a participatory action research project that encompassed the creation of informative videos, paper resource guides, an innovative app, and a comprehensive video-making training course, all designed to empower students in navigating the complexities of college life effectively. We highlight the importance of prior research methods training for undergraduates and offer methods for seamlessly integrating such training into existing educational structures. To address the sensitivity of student retention issues, we introduce a positive deviancy framework as a valuable perspective. Furthermore, we stress the significance of increased participation during the data analysis phase of participatory research, advocating for hybrid, in-person, and online approaches. The article also reflects on the political and ethical challenges associated with conducting participatory research in higher education, drawing insights from existing literature and our own experiences.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.94415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

About half of U.S. university students who start their degrees never finish — higher education retention is a pressing problem that has remained stagnant since the 1960s. This article highlights strategies for conducting research on undergraduate retention done by and with undergraduates themselves. This article’s context is a participatory action research project that encompassed the creation of informative videos, paper resource guides, an innovative app, and a comprehensive video-making training course, all designed to empower students in navigating the complexities of college life effectively. We highlight the importance of prior research methods training for undergraduates and offer methods for seamlessly integrating such training into existing educational structures. To address the sensitivity of student retention issues, we introduce a positive deviancy framework as a valuable perspective. Furthermore, we stress the significance of increased participation during the data analysis phase of participatory research, advocating for hybrid, in-person, and online approaches. The article also reflects on the political and ethical challenges associated with conducting participatory research in higher education, drawing insights from existing literature and our own experiences.
重新构想留校工作:参与式行动和积极反常现象促进大学生成功
约有一半的美国大学生在开始攻读学位时从未完成学业--高等教育的保留率是一个亟待解决的问题,自 20 世纪 60 年代以来一直停滞不前。本文重点介绍了由本科生自己并与本科生一起开展本科生保留率研究的策略。本文的背景是一个参与式行动研究项目,该项目包括制作内容丰富的视频、纸质资源指南、创新应用程序和综合视频制作培训课程,所有这些都旨在增强学生的能力,使他们能够有效地应对复杂的大学生活。我们强调了事先对本科生进行研究方法培训的重要性,并提供了将此类培训无缝整合到现有教育结构中的方法。为了解决学生保留问题的敏感性,我们引入了积极偏差框架作为一个有价值的视角。此外,我们还强调了在参与式研究的数据分析阶段提高参与度的重要性,提倡采用混合、面对面和在线的方法。文章还反思了在高等教育中开展参与式研究的政治和伦理挑战,并从现有文献和我们自身的经验中汲取了深刻的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信