Analysis of nationwide soil pesticide pollution: Insights from China

IF 7.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yabi Huang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zijian Li
{"title":"Analysis of nationwide soil pesticide pollution: Insights from China","authors":"Yabi Huang,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Zhang,&nbsp;Zijian Li","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2024.118988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China is a typical agricultural country that heavily relies on pesticides. Some pesticides can remain in the soil after application and thus pose a significant threat to human health. In order to characterize the status and hazards of nationwide soil contamination, this study extracted concentration data from published literature and analyzed them by a scoring approach, standard comparison and health risk assessment. For the soil pollution score, northern regions got the highest values, such as Henan (0.63), Liaoning (0.55), Heilongjiang (0.54) and Jilin (0.53), which implies high soil pesticide residues in these provinces. In contrast, Qinghai (−0.77), Guizhou (−0.64) and Tibet (−0.63) had lower scores. China's soil pesticide standards cover only 16 pesticides, and these pesticide concentrations were all below the corresponding standards. Direct exposure to soil pesticides in this study generally posed a negligible risk to children. Furthermore, pesticide dissipation and usage intensity in each province were analyzed as they were possible influences on pollution. The result showed that soil in the northern regions could accumulate more pesticides than those in the southern regions, and this geographic pattern was basically consistent with the distribution of soil pollution. However, the relationship between agricultural activities and soil pollution was less well characterized. It is recommended to establish a long-term monitoring database for pesticides and include more pesticides in regulatory frameworks. Additionally, efforts to accelerate pesticide degradation and shift the planting structure to reduce pesticide usage can help alleviate the pressure on soil from pesticides. This study can serve as a critical reference for policymakers and stakeholders in the field of agriculture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 118988"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935124008922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China is a typical agricultural country that heavily relies on pesticides. Some pesticides can remain in the soil after application and thus pose a significant threat to human health. In order to characterize the status and hazards of nationwide soil contamination, this study extracted concentration data from published literature and analyzed them by a scoring approach, standard comparison and health risk assessment. For the soil pollution score, northern regions got the highest values, such as Henan (0.63), Liaoning (0.55), Heilongjiang (0.54) and Jilin (0.53), which implies high soil pesticide residues in these provinces. In contrast, Qinghai (−0.77), Guizhou (−0.64) and Tibet (−0.63) had lower scores. China's soil pesticide standards cover only 16 pesticides, and these pesticide concentrations were all below the corresponding standards. Direct exposure to soil pesticides in this study generally posed a negligible risk to children. Furthermore, pesticide dissipation and usage intensity in each province were analyzed as they were possible influences on pollution. The result showed that soil in the northern regions could accumulate more pesticides than those in the southern regions, and this geographic pattern was basically consistent with the distribution of soil pollution. However, the relationship between agricultural activities and soil pollution was less well characterized. It is recommended to establish a long-term monitoring database for pesticides and include more pesticides in regulatory frameworks. Additionally, efforts to accelerate pesticide degradation and shift the planting structure to reduce pesticide usage can help alleviate the pressure on soil from pesticides. This study can serve as a critical reference for policymakers and stakeholders in the field of agriculture.

Abstract Image

全国土壤农药污染分析:来自中国的启示。
中国是一个典型的农业国,严重依赖农药。一些农药在施用后会残留在土壤中,从而对人体健康造成严重威胁。为了描述全国土壤污染的现状和危害,本研究从公开发表的文献中提取了浓度数据,并通过评分法、标准比较法和健康风险评估法进行了分析。在土壤污染分值方面,北方地区的分值最高,如河南(0.63)、辽宁(0.55)、黑龙江(0.54)和吉林(0.53),这意味着这些省份的土壤农药残留量较高。相比之下,青海(-0.77)、贵州(-0.64)和西藏(-0.63)的得分较低。中国的土壤农药标准只涉及 16 种农药,这些农药的浓度都低于相应的标准。在本研究中,直接接触土壤农药对儿童造成的风险总体上可以忽略不计。此外,还分析了各省的农药消散情况和使用强度,因为它们可能对污染产生影响。结果表明,北方地区土壤的农药累积量高于南方地区,这种地理格局与土壤污染的分布基本一致。然而,农业活动与土壤污染之间的关系却不甚明了。建议建立农药长期监测数据库,并将更多农药纳入监管框架。此外,加快农药降解、转变种植结构以减少农药用量,也有助于减轻农药对土壤的压力。本研究可为农业领域的政策制定者和利益相关者提供重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Research
Environmental Research 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
8.40%
发文量
2480
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信