The value of comprehensive United States database participation in granting carotid artery stenting privileges in a brave new world

Brian Rust BS, S.Christopher Frontario DO, Ryan Bird MD, Thomas Bernik MD
{"title":"The value of comprehensive United States database participation in granting carotid artery stenting privileges in a brave new world","authors":"Brian Rust BS,&nbsp;S.Christopher Frontario DO,&nbsp;Ryan Bird MD,&nbsp;Thomas Bernik MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article focuses on the provision of clinical privileges to physicians in the wake of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services updating their National Coverage Decision to cover all carotid stenting procedures. This article emphasizes that participation in nationwide data registries fulfills quality monitoring and improvement requirements under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National Coverage Decision and, therefore, should be a mandatory requirement in credentialing decisions for all carotid artery stenting procedures at an institutional level. Data from registries such as the Vascular Quality Initiative or National Surgery Quality Improvement Program have been instrumental in comparisons of outcomes and learning curves between carotid procedures. Credentialing guidelines, as outlined by medical societies, already reflect crucial evidence-based differences in learning curves and in volume-outcomes relationships which have critical relevance to the quality of care for patients undergoing carotid stenting procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000291/pdfft?md5=3ad80df38ef8fe5ec3b819726857510a&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000291-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the provision of clinical privileges to physicians in the wake of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services updating their National Coverage Decision to cover all carotid stenting procedures. This article emphasizes that participation in nationwide data registries fulfills quality monitoring and improvement requirements under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National Coverage Decision and, therefore, should be a mandatory requirement in credentialing decisions for all carotid artery stenting procedures at an institutional level. Data from registries such as the Vascular Quality Initiative or National Surgery Quality Improvement Program have been instrumental in comparisons of outcomes and learning curves between carotid procedures. Credentialing guidelines, as outlined by medical societies, already reflect crucial evidence-based differences in learning curves and in volume-outcomes relationships which have critical relevance to the quality of care for patients undergoing carotid stenting procedures.

在勇敢的新世界中,美国综合数据库的参与对授予颈动脉支架植入特权的价值
在医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心更新了其 "国家承保范围决定",将所有颈动脉支架置入术纳入承保范围后,本文重点讨论了为医生提供临床特权的问题。本文强调,参与全国范围的数据登记符合医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心国家承保范围决定中的质量监控和改进要求,因此应成为机构层面所有颈动脉支架置入手术资格认证决定的强制性要求。血管质量倡议或国家手术质量改进计划等注册机构提供的数据有助于对颈动脉手术的结果和学习曲线进行比较。医学会制定的资格认证指南已经反映了学习曲线和手术量-结果关系中的重要循证差异,这些差异与颈动脉支架植入术患者的治疗质量密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信