Longitudinal associations of polypharmacy and frailty with major cardiovascular events and mortality among more than half a million middle-aged participants of the UK Biobank

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Li-Ju Chen , Sha Sha , Hermann Brenner , Ben Schöttker
{"title":"Longitudinal associations of polypharmacy and frailty with major cardiovascular events and mortality among more than half a million middle-aged participants of the UK Biobank","authors":"Li-Ju Chen ,&nbsp;Sha Sha ,&nbsp;Hermann Brenner ,&nbsp;Ben Schöttker","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies of the associations of polypharmacy and frailty with adverse health outcomes in middle-aged adults are limited. Furthermore, a potentially stronger association of polypharmacy with adverse health outcomes in frail than in non-frail adults is of interest.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate associations of frailty (assessed using a frailty index) and polypharmacy (defined as taking five or more drugs) with major cardiovascular events, cancer incidence, all-cause, cardiovascular disease-specific, and cancer-specific mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze 501,548 participants of the UK Biobank cohort study aged 40–69 years who were followed up for an average of 12 years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of pre-frailty and frailty were 43.2 % and 2.3 %, respectively, and that of polypharmacy was 18.3 %. Although strongly associated with each other, frailty and polypharmacy were independently, statistically significantly associated with major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular disease-specific, and all-cause mortality. In addition, the hazard ratios of polypharmacy were stronger among (pre-)frail than non-frail study participants. No profound associations with cancer incidence and cancer mortality were observed. No sex and age differences were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This large cohort study showed that polypharmacy and frailty are independent risk factors for major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular disease-specific and all-cause mortality in both middle-aged (40–64 years) and older people (≥ 65 years). In addition, the hazard ratios of polypharmacy were stronger among (pre-)frail than non-frail study participants. This underlines the need to avoid polypharmacy as far as possible not only in older but also in middle-aged subjects (40–64 years), especially if they are pre-frail or frail.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224000938/pdfft?md5=49117c80b2f646de3a955defa90456ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0378512224000938-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224000938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Studies of the associations of polypharmacy and frailty with adverse health outcomes in middle-aged adults are limited. Furthermore, a potentially stronger association of polypharmacy with adverse health outcomes in frail than in non-frail adults is of interest.

Objective

To evaluate associations of frailty (assessed using a frailty index) and polypharmacy (defined as taking five or more drugs) with major cardiovascular events, cancer incidence, all-cause, cardiovascular disease-specific, and cancer-specific mortality.

Methods

Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze 501,548 participants of the UK Biobank cohort study aged 40–69 years who were followed up for an average of 12 years.

Results

The prevalence of pre-frailty and frailty were 43.2 % and 2.3 %, respectively, and that of polypharmacy was 18.3 %. Although strongly associated with each other, frailty and polypharmacy were independently, statistically significantly associated with major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular disease-specific, and all-cause mortality. In addition, the hazard ratios of polypharmacy were stronger among (pre-)frail than non-frail study participants. No profound associations with cancer incidence and cancer mortality were observed. No sex and age differences were observed.

Conclusions

This large cohort study showed that polypharmacy and frailty are independent risk factors for major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular disease-specific and all-cause mortality in both middle-aged (40–64 years) and older people (≥ 65 years). In addition, the hazard ratios of polypharmacy were stronger among (pre-)frail than non-frail study participants. This underlines the need to avoid polypharmacy as far as possible not only in older but also in middle-aged subjects (40–64 years), especially if they are pre-frail or frail.

英国生物数据库 50 多万名中年参与者的多药治疗和虚弱与重大心血管事件和死亡率的纵向联系
背景有关中年人多药治疗和虚弱与不良健康后果之间关系的研究十分有限。目的 评估虚弱(使用虚弱指数评估)和多药(定义为服用五种或五种以上药物)与主要心血管事件、癌症发病率、全因死亡率、心血管疾病特异性死亡率和癌症特异性死亡率之间的关系。方法使用 Cox 比例危险回归模型分析了英国生物库队列研究的 501,548 名参与者,他们的年龄在 40-69 岁之间,平均随访 12 年。虽然虚弱和多药与主要心血管事件、心血管疾病特异性死亡率和全因死亡率密切相关,但在统计学上却具有显著的独立相关性。此外,与非虚弱的研究对象相比,(虚弱前)虚弱的研究对象的多重药物治疗危险比更高。没有观察到与癌症发病率和癌症死亡率有深远的联系。结论这项大型队列研究表明,多药和体弱是中年人(40-64 岁)和老年人(≥ 65 岁)发生重大心血管事件、心血管疾病特异性死亡和全因死亡的独立风险因素。此外,与非体弱者相比,(前期)体弱者使用多种药物的危险比更高。这突出表明,不仅是老年人,中年人(40-64 岁)也需要尽可能避免使用多种药物,尤其是体弱前期或体弱者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信