Physiological variables for the objective detection of nerve block failure in dogs

IF 1.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Etienne P. Basson , Abdur R. Kadwa , Christiaan J. Blignaut , Gareth E. Zeiler
{"title":"Physiological variables for the objective detection of nerve block failure in dogs","authors":"Etienne P. Basson ,&nbsp;Abdur R. Kadwa ,&nbsp;Christiaan J. Blignaut ,&nbsp;Gareth E. Zeiler","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify physiological variables for objectively detecting nociception indicative of intraoperative peripheral nerve block failure.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A double-blinded randomized clinical study.</p></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><p>A sample of 14 male (40.8 ± 12 kg; mean ± standard deviation) and 16 female (34.3 ± 11.4 kg) client-owned dogs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dogs were randomly assigned to one of three groups for psoas compartment and proximal sciatic nerve blocks (0.2 mL kg<sup>–1</sup> per site): guided bupivacaine (GBB), or saline (GSB) block or a blind bupivacaine block (BBB). Guided blocks were performed using an ultrasound-peripheral nerve locator combination. Premedication consisted of medetomidine 0.01 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> and morphine 0.3 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>. General anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to compare actual values and change in values of physiological variables between GSB and GBB. The Youden index and associated criterion for each physiological variable were used to determine an objective measure for nociception. Fisher’s exact <em>t</em> test, McNemar’s test and Cohen’s kappa statistical analysis were used to determine association, differences and inter-score reliability between the objective and subjective scoring for BBB.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cardiovascular variables had good discriminating ability to identify a nociceptive response (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). The Youden indices for mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure were most reliable in detecting nociception. The highest sensitivity was that of ΔMAP (100%) with good agreement between the subjective and objective scores of Δheart rate or systolic arterial pressure (SAP). The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP, ΔDAP had the best ability in indicating peripheral nerve block failure (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><p>Blood pressure values can detect a response to surgical stimulus in adequately anaesthetized dogs. The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP or ΔDAP may be considered as objective measures to detect nerve block failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724000424/pdfft?md5=79252ecebbc8c908695c9ecc0ddb961d&pid=1-s2.0-S1467298724000424-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724000424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify physiological variables for objectively detecting nociception indicative of intraoperative peripheral nerve block failure.

Study design

A double-blinded randomized clinical study.

Animals

A sample of 14 male (40.8 ± 12 kg; mean ± standard deviation) and 16 female (34.3 ± 11.4 kg) client-owned dogs.

Methods

Dogs were randomly assigned to one of three groups for psoas compartment and proximal sciatic nerve blocks (0.2 mL kg–1 per site): guided bupivacaine (GBB), or saline (GSB) block or a blind bupivacaine block (BBB). Guided blocks were performed using an ultrasound-peripheral nerve locator combination. Premedication consisted of medetomidine 0.01 mg kg–1 and morphine 0.3 mg kg–1. General anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to compare actual values and change in values of physiological variables between GSB and GBB. The Youden index and associated criterion for each physiological variable were used to determine an objective measure for nociception. Fisher’s exact t test, McNemar’s test and Cohen’s kappa statistical analysis were used to determine association, differences and inter-score reliability between the objective and subjective scoring for BBB.

Results

Cardiovascular variables had good discriminating ability to identify a nociceptive response (p < 0.01). The Youden indices for mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure were most reliable in detecting nociception. The highest sensitivity was that of ΔMAP (100%) with good agreement between the subjective and objective scores of Δheart rate or systolic arterial pressure (SAP). The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP, ΔDAP had the best ability in indicating peripheral nerve block failure (p < 0.001).

Conclusions and clinical relevance

Blood pressure values can detect a response to surgical stimulus in adequately anaesthetized dogs. The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP or ΔDAP may be considered as objective measures to detect nerve block failure.

客观检测犬神经阻滞失败的生理变量
研究设计双盲随机临床研究动物抽样调查了 14 只公犬(40.8 ± 12 千克;平均 ± 标准差)和 16 只母犬(34.3 ± 11.4 千克)。方法将狗随机分配到三组中的一组,进行腰大肌室和坐骨神经近端阻滞(每个部位 0.2 mL kg-1):引导布比卡因 (GBB) 或生理盐水 (GSB) 阻滞或盲布比卡因阻滞 (BBB)。导引阻滞使用超声-周围神经定位器组合进行。术前用药包括美托咪定 0.01 毫克/公斤-1 和吗啡 0.3 毫克/公斤-1。使用异丙酚诱导全身麻醉,并在氧气中使用异氟醚维持麻醉。采用受体运算特性曲线分析来比较 GSB 和 GBB 之间生理变量的实际值和变化值。尤登指数和每个生理变量的相关标准用于确定痛觉的客观测量值。费舍尔精确 t 检验、麦克尼马检验和科恩卡帕统计分析用于确定 BBB 客观评分和主观评分之间的关联、差异和评分间可靠性。平均动脉压(MAP)和舒张压(DAP)的尤登指数在检测痛觉反应方面最为可靠。ΔMAP的灵敏度最高(100%),Δ心率或收缩动脉压(SAP)的主观和客观评分之间具有良好的一致性。使用 ΔMAP、ΔSAP 和 ΔDAP 指示周围神经阻滞失败的能力最强(p < 0.001)。使用 ΔMAP、ΔSAP 或 ΔDAP 可作为检测神经阻滞失败的客观指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome: the basic sciences; pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management equipment intensive care chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals welfare issues associated with pain and distress education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信