Surprise Billing in Foot and Ankle Surgery and Its Effect on Patient Satisfaction

Joseph A S McCahon, T. Moncman, Tyler M. Radack, Mark Miller, Selene G. Parekh, D. Pedowitz, Joseph N Daniel
{"title":"Surprise Billing in Foot and Ankle Surgery and Its Effect on Patient Satisfaction","authors":"Joseph A S McCahon, T. Moncman, Tyler M. Radack, Mark Miller, Selene G. Parekh, D. Pedowitz, Joseph N Daniel","doi":"10.1177/2473011424s00092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Purpose: Patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery may find themselves facing unexpected medical bills. This is known as surprise billing and has caused financial hardship for many patients, prompting policymakers to pass the “No Surprise Act”. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of surprise bills in patient undergoing foot and ankle surgery and the effect of surprise billing on patient satisfaction. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent a foot and ankle surgery from May 2021 to November 2022 at a large multi-state institution. Patients completed a questionnaire regarding the incidence of surprise bills following their surgery, the details regarding those bills, and how those bills affected the surgical satisfaction. Results: Of the 771 responses, 23% of participants received at least one surprise bill following their foot and ankle procedure, with 39% of these bills being greater than $1000. The most common surprise bill came from the surgical facility (46%) followed by anesthesia (42%). Furthermore, the incidence of surprise billing before and after the implementation of the “No Surprise Act” on January 1st, 2022 was not found be significantly different (p=0.134). Patients who received surprise bills reported being significantly less satisfied with their surgery (p < 0.001) and felt their billing experience affected their surgical satisfaction. Conclusion: Despite recent legislative efforts, surprise billing in foot and ankle surgery is common and can negatively affect patient surgical satisfaction. Although surgeons may be unable to limit the amount of bills patients receive postoperatively, increased communication and education regarding the perioperative billing process may prove to be beneficial for both patient satisfaction and the doctor-patient relationship.","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"212 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424s00092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: Patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery may find themselves facing unexpected medical bills. This is known as surprise billing and has caused financial hardship for many patients, prompting policymakers to pass the “No Surprise Act”. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of surprise bills in patient undergoing foot and ankle surgery and the effect of surprise billing on patient satisfaction. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent a foot and ankle surgery from May 2021 to November 2022 at a large multi-state institution. Patients completed a questionnaire regarding the incidence of surprise bills following their surgery, the details regarding those bills, and how those bills affected the surgical satisfaction. Results: Of the 771 responses, 23% of participants received at least one surprise bill following their foot and ankle procedure, with 39% of these bills being greater than $1000. The most common surprise bill came from the surgical facility (46%) followed by anesthesia (42%). Furthermore, the incidence of surprise billing before and after the implementation of the “No Surprise Act” on January 1st, 2022 was not found be significantly different (p=0.134). Patients who received surprise bills reported being significantly less satisfied with their surgery (p < 0.001) and felt their billing experience affected their surgical satisfaction. Conclusion: Despite recent legislative efforts, surprise billing in foot and ankle surgery is common and can negatively affect patient surgical satisfaction. Although surgeons may be unable to limit the amount of bills patients receive postoperatively, increased communication and education regarding the perioperative billing process may prove to be beneficial for both patient satisfaction and the doctor-patient relationship.
足踝手术中的意外账单及其对患者满意度的影响
导言/目的:接受足踝手术的患者可能会发现自己面临意想不到的医疗账单。这种情况被称为意外账单,给许多患者造成了经济困难,促使政策制定者通过了 "无意外法案"。本研究旨在确定接受足踝手术的患者中意外账单的发生率,以及意外账单对患者满意度的影响。研究方法这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 11 月期间在一家大型跨州医疗机构接受足踝手术的患者。患者填写了一份调查问卷,内容涉及术后意外账单的发生率、这些账单的详细情况以及这些账单对手术满意度的影响。结果显示在 771 份回复中,23% 的参与者在足踝手术后收到至少一份意外账单,其中 39% 的账单金额超过 1000 美元。最常见的意外账单来自手术机构(46%),其次是麻醉机构(42%)。此外,在 2022 年 1 月 1 日 "无意外法案 "实施前后,意外账单的发生率没有明显差异(P=0.134)。收到意外账单的患者对手术的满意度明显较低(p < 0.001),并认为账单经历影响了他们的手术满意度。结论:尽管最近出台了相关立法,但足踝手术中的突击收费现象仍很普遍,而且会对患者的手术满意度产生负面影响。虽然外科医生可能无法限制患者术后收到的账单数量,但加强有关围手术期账单流程的沟通和教育可能会对患者满意度和医患关系有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信