Safety and efficacy of nivolumab therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and impaired kidney function

N. Sengul , I. Gültürk , M. Yilmaz , E. Celik , N. Paksoy , E. Yekedüz , Y. Ürün , M. Basaran , M. Özgüroğlu
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of nivolumab therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and impaired kidney function","authors":"N. Sengul ,&nbsp;I. Gültürk ,&nbsp;M. Yilmaz ,&nbsp;E. Celik ,&nbsp;N. Paksoy ,&nbsp;E. Yekedüz ,&nbsp;Y. Ürün ,&nbsp;M. Basaran ,&nbsp;M. Özgüroğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patients with renal insufficiency, usually defined as those with creatinine clearance &lt; 40 mL/min, were excluded from pivotal clinical trials, especially in studies involving nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) stratified according to creatinine clearance.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Data from mRCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into two categories according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); the first category (C1) included patients with eGFR &lt; 40 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and the second category (C2) included those with eGFR ≥ 40 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 95 patients enrolled, 1. group included 26 patients (27.4%) and 2. group included 69 patients (72.6%). None of the pts in category 1 were on hemodialysis. Overall incidence of adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (<em>P</em> = .469). The overall response rate ORR was 50% in the first group and 42.0% in the second group (<em>P</em> = .486). Median overall survival (OS) was longer with 23.3 months in the 2. group versus 11 months in the 1. group (<em>P</em> = .415).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Renal insufficiency is a common problem in patients with advanced renal cancer since they often undergo nephrectomy and their renal function may also worsen while receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We found that there is no significant difference in the safety and efficacy of nivolumab treatment between two groups. Nivolumab appears to be a safe and effective agent in patients with renal impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 4","pages":"Pages 273-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173578624000295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with renal insufficiency, usually defined as those with creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min, were excluded from pivotal clinical trials, especially in studies involving nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) stratified according to creatinine clearance.

Material and methods

Data from mRCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into two categories according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); the first category (C1) included patients with eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the second category (C2) included those with eGFR ≥ 40 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Results

Of the 95 patients enrolled, 1. group included 26 patients (27.4%) and 2. group included 69 patients (72.6%). None of the pts in category 1 were on hemodialysis. Overall incidence of adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (P = .469). The overall response rate ORR was 50% in the first group and 42.0% in the second group (P = .486). Median overall survival (OS) was longer with 23.3 months in the 2. group versus 11 months in the 1. group (P = .415).

Conclusion

Renal insufficiency is a common problem in patients with advanced renal cancer since they often undergo nephrectomy and their renal function may also worsen while receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We found that there is no significant difference in the safety and efficacy of nivolumab treatment between two groups. Nivolumab appears to be a safe and effective agent in patients with renal impairment.

肾功能受损的转移性肾细胞癌患者接受 nivolumab 治疗的安全性和有效性。
导言肾功能不全患者通常被定义为肌酐清除率大于或等于40 mL/min的患者,他们被排除在关键临床试验之外,尤其是在涉及肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的nivolumab治疗研究中。本研究的目的是评估根据肌酐清除率分层的nivolumab对转移性RCC(mRCC)患者的疗效和安全性。根据患者的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)将其分为两类:第一类(C1)包括eGFR< 40 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者,第二类(C2)包括eGFR≥40 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者。结果 在入组的95名患者中,1.组包括26名患者(27.4%),2.组包括69名患者(72.6%)。第 1 组患者均未进行血液透析。两组的不良反应总发生率无统计学差异(P = .469)。第一组的总反应率ORR为50%,第二组为42.0%(P = .486)。结论肾功能不全是晚期肾癌患者的常见问题,因为他们通常要接受肾切除术,而且在接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗期间,肾功能也可能会恶化。我们发现,两组患者接受尼妥珠单抗治疗的安全性和有效性没有明显差异。对于肾功能受损的患者来说,尼妥珠单抗似乎是一种安全有效的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信