No evidence that arousal affects reactivated memories

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Olivier T. de Vries , Sascha B. Duken , Merel Kindt , Vanessa A. van Ast
{"title":"No evidence that arousal affects reactivated memories","authors":"Olivier T. de Vries ,&nbsp;Sascha B. Duken ,&nbsp;Merel Kindt ,&nbsp;Vanessa A. van Ast","doi":"10.1016/j.nlm.2024.107928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Memory for inherently neutral elements of emotional events is often enhanced on delayed tests - an effect that has been attributed to noradrenergic arousal. Reactivation of a memory is thought to return its corresponding neural ensemble to a state that is similar to when it was originally experienced. Therefore, we hypothesized that neutral elements of memories, too, can be enhanced through reactivation concurrent with heightened arousal. Participants (n = 94) visited the lab for three sessions. During the first session, they encoded 120 neutral memories consisting of an object presented in unique context images. In session two, the 80 objects were reactivated by presenting their corresponding context images, 40 of which were immediately followed by an arousal-inducing shock. Finally, recognition memory for all objects was tested. It was found that memory for reactivated objects was enhanced, but even though the shocks elicited elevations in arousal as indexed by skin conductance, there was no difference between memory of objects reactivated with and without heightened arousal. We thus conclude that arousal, when isolated from other cognitive and affective variables that might impact memory, has no enhancing effect on reactivated memories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19102,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107474272400039X/pdfft?md5=cfa1f4bcb9f0e2aac6643fcc214c7c63&pid=1-s2.0-S107474272400039X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107474272400039X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Memory for inherently neutral elements of emotional events is often enhanced on delayed tests - an effect that has been attributed to noradrenergic arousal. Reactivation of a memory is thought to return its corresponding neural ensemble to a state that is similar to when it was originally experienced. Therefore, we hypothesized that neutral elements of memories, too, can be enhanced through reactivation concurrent with heightened arousal. Participants (n = 94) visited the lab for three sessions. During the first session, they encoded 120 neutral memories consisting of an object presented in unique context images. In session two, the 80 objects were reactivated by presenting their corresponding context images, 40 of which were immediately followed by an arousal-inducing shock. Finally, recognition memory for all objects was tested. It was found that memory for reactivated objects was enhanced, but even though the shocks elicited elevations in arousal as indexed by skin conductance, there was no difference between memory of objects reactivated with and without heightened arousal. We thus conclude that arousal, when isolated from other cognitive and affective variables that might impact memory, has no enhancing effect on reactivated memories.

没有证据表明唤醒会影响重新激活的记忆
在延迟测试中,对情绪事件中固有的中性元素的记忆往往会增强--这种效应被归因于去甲肾上腺素能唤醒。人们认为,记忆的再激活会使其相应的神经组合恢复到与最初经历时相似的状态。因此,我们假设,记忆中的中性元素也可以通过与唤醒同时进行的重新激活而得到增强。参与者(n = 94)在实验室进行了三次学习。在第一个环节中,他们编码了 120 个中性记忆,其中包括一个在独特背景图像中呈现的物体。在第二个环节中,通过呈现相应的情境图像来重新激活这 80 个对象,其中 40 个对象会立即受到诱发唤醒的冲击。最后,对所有物体的识别记忆进行测试。结果发现,对重新激活的物体的记忆增强了,但即使电击引起了以皮肤电导为指标的唤醒水平的升高,在唤醒水平升高和未升高的情况下,对重新激活的物体的记忆并无差异。因此,我们得出结论,如果将唤醒与可能影响记忆的其他认知和情感变量分开,唤醒对重新激活的记忆没有增强作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory publishes articles examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying learning and memory at all levels of analysis ranging from molecular biology to synaptic and neural plasticity and behavior. We are especially interested in manuscripts that examine the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying learning, memory and plasticity in both experimental animals and human subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信