Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sally Moy, Mona Irannejad, Stephanie Jeanneret Manning, Mehrdad Farahani, Yomna Ahmed, Ellis Gao, Radhika Prabhune, Suzan Lorenz, Raza Mirza, Christopher Klinger
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sally Moy, Mona Irannejad, Stephanie Jeanneret Manning, Mehrdad Farahani, Yomna Ahmed, Ellis Gao, Radhika Prabhune, Suzan Lorenz, Raza Mirza, Christopher Klinger","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nArtificial intelligence (AI) technology is being rapidly adopted into many different branches of medicine. Although research has started to highlight the impact of AI on health care, the focus on patient perspectives of AI is scarce. This scoping review aimed to explore the literature on adult patients' perspectives on the use of an array of AI technologies in the health care setting for design and deployment.\n\n\nMethods\nThis scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). To evaluate patient perspectives, we conducted a comprehensive literature search using eight interdisciplinary electronic databases, including grey literature. Articles published from 2015 to 2022 that focused on patient views regarding AI technology in health care were included. Thematic analysis was performed on the extracted articles.\n\n\nResults\nOf the 10,571 imported studies, 37 articles were included and extracted. From the 33 peer-reviewed and 4 grey literature articles, the following themes on AI emerged: (i) Patient attitudes, (ii) Influences on patient attitudes, (iii) Considerations for design, and (iv) Considerations for use.\n\n\nConclusions\nPatients are key stakeholders essential to the uptake of AI in health care. The findings indicate that patients' needs and expectations are not fully considered in the application of AI in health care. Therefore, there is a need for patient voices in the development of AI in health care.","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is being rapidly adopted into many different branches of medicine. Although research has started to highlight the impact of AI on health care, the focus on patient perspectives of AI is scarce. This scoping review aimed to explore the literature on adult patients' perspectives on the use of an array of AI technologies in the health care setting for design and deployment. Methods This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). To evaluate patient perspectives, we conducted a comprehensive literature search using eight interdisciplinary electronic databases, including grey literature. Articles published from 2015 to 2022 that focused on patient views regarding AI technology in health care were included. Thematic analysis was performed on the extracted articles. Results Of the 10,571 imported studies, 37 articles were included and extracted. From the 33 peer-reviewed and 4 grey literature articles, the following themes on AI emerged: (i) Patient attitudes, (ii) Influences on patient attitudes, (iii) Considerations for design, and (iv) Considerations for use. Conclusions Patients are key stakeholders essential to the uptake of AI in health care. The findings indicate that patients' needs and expectations are not fully considered in the application of AI in health care. Therefore, there is a need for patient voices in the development of AI in health care.
患者对人工智能在医疗保健中应用的看法:范围综述》。
目的 人工智能(AI)技术正被迅速应用于许多不同的医学领域。虽然已有研究开始强调人工智能对医疗保健的影响,但很少关注患者对人工智能的看法。本范围界定综述旨在探讨成年患者对在医疗保健环境中使用一系列人工智能技术的设计和部署的看法。为了评估患者的观点,我们使用八个跨学科电子数据库(包括灰色文献)进行了全面的文献检索。我们收录了 2015 年至 2022 年间发表的关于患者对医疗保健领域人工智能技术看法的文章。对提取的文章进行了专题分析。从 33 篇同行评审文章和 4 篇灰色文献中,我们发现了以下有关人工智能的主题:(i) 患者态度,(ii) 患者态度的影响因素,(iii) 设计方面的考虑因素,以及 (iv) 使用方面的考虑因素。研究结果表明,在医疗保健领域应用人工智能时,并未充分考虑患者的需求和期望。因此,在开发医疗领域的人工智能时,需要听取患者的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信