“Guess Who?” in the Creation of Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Diets through History

Inmaculada Zarzo, Nadia San Onofre, Jose M. Soriano
{"title":"“Guess Who?” in the Creation of Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Diets through History","authors":"Inmaculada Zarzo, Nadia San Onofre, Jose M. Soriano","doi":"10.21926/rpn.2402005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between obesity and weight loss treatments has run parallel throughout history; however, not all diets are suitable for improving one’s health. This review aims to categorize diets according to the new classification of hazardous diets established in 2021. A search was conducted across grey, white, and black literature. The results reveal a study of 179 diets, of which 35 are effective, while the rest are hazardous to health. Looking at the geographical distribution of these diets, the USA, the UK, and Greece dominate the top three spots. The geographic distribution of diets is linked to cultural and environmental factors, with influencers often playing a predominant role. Additionally, the lack of legislative oversight on emerging diets is a noteworthy concern, highlighting the need for regulatory measures to ensure the safety and well-being of individuals engaging in such dietary practices. Regarding the creators of these weight loss treatments, it is noteworthy that only 7.8% are nutrition specialists, all of whom fall under the effective diets category. This demonstrates that healthy treatments and nutritionists are the best combination for losing weight and improving health.","PeriodicalId":74647,"journal":{"name":"Recent progress in nutrition","volume":"980 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent progress in nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/rpn.2402005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between obesity and weight loss treatments has run parallel throughout history; however, not all diets are suitable for improving one’s health. This review aims to categorize diets according to the new classification of hazardous diets established in 2021. A search was conducted across grey, white, and black literature. The results reveal a study of 179 diets, of which 35 are effective, while the rest are hazardous to health. Looking at the geographical distribution of these diets, the USA, the UK, and Greece dominate the top three spots. The geographic distribution of diets is linked to cultural and environmental factors, with influencers often playing a predominant role. Additionally, the lack of legislative oversight on emerging diets is a noteworthy concern, highlighting the need for regulatory measures to ensure the safety and well-being of individuals engaging in such dietary practices. Regarding the creators of these weight loss treatments, it is noteworthy that only 7.8% are nutrition specialists, all of whom fall under the effective diets category. This demonstrates that healthy treatments and nutritionists are the best combination for losing weight and improving health.
"历史上制作有害和无害饮食的 "猜猜谁?
肥胖与减肥治疗之间的关系在历史上一直并行不悖;然而,并非所有饮食都适合改善人们的健康。本综述旨在根据 2021 年制定的危险饮食新分类法对饮食进行分类。我们对灰色、白色和黑色文献进行了检索。结果显示,研究了 179 种膳食,其中 35 种有效,其余的有害健康。从这些饮食的地理分布来看,美国、英国和希腊占据了前三位。饮食的地理分布与文化和环境因素有关,影响因素往往起着主导作用。此外,对新兴饮食缺乏立法监督也是一个值得关注的问题,这凸显了监管措施的必要性,以确保从事此类饮食实践的个人的安全和健康。关于这些减肥疗法的创造者,值得注意的是,只有 7.8% 是营养专家,他们都属于有效饮食类别。这表明,健康疗法和营养学家是减肥和改善健康的最佳组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信