The social lives of rental proptech: Entanglements between capitalist, care and techno-utopian values

Sophia Maalsen, D. Rogers, Peta Wolifson
{"title":"The social lives of rental proptech: Entanglements between capitalist, care and techno-utopian values","authors":"Sophia Maalsen, D. Rogers, Peta Wolifson","doi":"10.1177/02637758241231105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Housing’s value is contested, with discussions including the economic value of housing through literature on assetisation and financialisation, social value in debates about housing as a human right, value capture in infrastructure development, and the value of housing for social reproduction. With this in mind, we engage with the various ways housing, tenants and Proptech are valued by tenant advocates, real estate professionals, and proptech developers in Sydney, Australia. This is not as a reductive exercise to find ‘the value’ of housing or Proptech, but to recognise and engage with the ways various social, digital and financial valuations of housing, tenants and digital technologies inform a situated and relational politics of Proptech value. As such we advance a ‘more-than-political’ economy of Proptech. To illustrate this conceptual case, we discuss three regimes of rental Proptech value in Australia – capitalist and economic regimes; social capital through an ethic of care; and techno-utopian values, where technology is deployed on the basis that it will solve a presumed problem. Our empirical focus is on the application of Proptech to longer-term rental market, which is emerging in less visible ways than its highly contested counterparts in the short-term rental sector.","PeriodicalId":504516,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","volume":"191 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758241231105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Housing’s value is contested, with discussions including the economic value of housing through literature on assetisation and financialisation, social value in debates about housing as a human right, value capture in infrastructure development, and the value of housing for social reproduction. With this in mind, we engage with the various ways housing, tenants and Proptech are valued by tenant advocates, real estate professionals, and proptech developers in Sydney, Australia. This is not as a reductive exercise to find ‘the value’ of housing or Proptech, but to recognise and engage with the ways various social, digital and financial valuations of housing, tenants and digital technologies inform a situated and relational politics of Proptech value. As such we advance a ‘more-than-political’ economy of Proptech. To illustrate this conceptual case, we discuss three regimes of rental Proptech value in Australia – capitalist and economic regimes; social capital through an ethic of care; and techno-utopian values, where technology is deployed on the basis that it will solve a presumed problem. Our empirical focus is on the application of Proptech to longer-term rental market, which is emerging in less visible ways than its highly contested counterparts in the short-term rental sector.
租赁物业技术的社会生活:资本主义、关爱和技术乌托邦价值观之间的纠葛
住房的价值是有争议的,讨论内容包括通过资产化和金融化的文献了解住房的经济价值、在住房作为一项人权的辩论中了解住房的社会价值、在基础设施开发中获取价值,以及住房对社会再生产的价值。有鉴于此,我们探讨了澳大利亚悉尼的租户倡导者、房地产专业人士和房产科技开发商对住房、租户和房产科技的各种评价方式。这并不是要还原住房或 Proptech 的 "价值",而是要认识并参与对住房、租户和数字技术的各种社会、数字和金融评价,为 Proptech 价值的情景和关系政治提供信息。因此,我们提出了一种 "超越政治 "的房产科技经济。为了说明这一概念性案例,我们讨论了澳大利亚租赁 Proptech 价值的三种制度--资本主义和经济制度;通过关爱伦理实现的社会资本;以及技术乌托邦价值观,即技术部署的基础是它将解决一个假定的问题。我们的实证研究重点是 Proptech 在长期租赁市场中的应用,与短期租赁市场中竞争激烈的同类产品相比,长期租赁市场的兴起并不那么引人注目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信