Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Global Automakers in Asia: Application of Carroll Model with Multi-Case Study Method

Dr. Mannat Singh, Dr. Rekha Dahiya, Mr. Siddhartha Tomar, Dr. Pooja Sangwan
{"title":"Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Global Automakers in Asia: Application of Carroll Model with Multi-Case Study Method","authors":"Dr. Mannat Singh, Dr. Rekha Dahiya, Mr. Siddhartha Tomar, Dr. Pooja Sangwan","doi":"10.52783/jier.v4i1.740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spite of acknowledging the importance of sustainable and socially responsible practices; researchers have not been able to unanimously identify the priority areas of CSR for the automotive sector. This research was designed to understand the CSR activities of the global automakers in the Asian countries by applying the Carroll model wherein researchers wished to analyse the CSR programs of the global automakers, identify the priority CSR areas and assess the effect of CSR strategies on business performance of global automakers. Case study method was used in the existing study. This study utilised multiple case study research strategy whereby two automobile companies were studied in depth namely, Toyota and Volkswagen. The data for the study was secured from different- structured data sources like company reports, sustainability data records and media coverage. Data was analysed using content analysis. The study concluded that both companies are widely engaged in CSR initiatives that covered ethical, philanthropic, legal, and economic responsibilities. Toyota focused on their production process and policies that was employee centric, Volkswagen worked on industry modernization as well in their ethical practices. The philanthropic initiatives at both places worked towards education/training, employment generation, collaborations/partnerships, environmental and social welfare. Volkswagen also focused on sports and, art and cultural aspects in their humanitarian responsibilities. Both the peers were on the same page regarding economic practices where the cutting costs and improving efficiency was in focus. Both Toyota and Volkswagen gave more priority to the philanthropic and ethical aspect than the economic aspect. Both the companies experienced similar outcomes from these CSR initiatives like positive financial measures, quality metrics, brand identity improvement and differentiation, worker and consumer satisfaction, risk management and aversion, improved partnership opportunities.","PeriodicalId":201034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informatics Education and Research","volume":"158 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informatics Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i1.740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In spite of acknowledging the importance of sustainable and socially responsible practices; researchers have not been able to unanimously identify the priority areas of CSR for the automotive sector. This research was designed to understand the CSR activities of the global automakers in the Asian countries by applying the Carroll model wherein researchers wished to analyse the CSR programs of the global automakers, identify the priority CSR areas and assess the effect of CSR strategies on business performance of global automakers. Case study method was used in the existing study. This study utilised multiple case study research strategy whereby two automobile companies were studied in depth namely, Toyota and Volkswagen. The data for the study was secured from different- structured data sources like company reports, sustainability data records and media coverage. Data was analysed using content analysis. The study concluded that both companies are widely engaged in CSR initiatives that covered ethical, philanthropic, legal, and economic responsibilities. Toyota focused on their production process and policies that was employee centric, Volkswagen worked on industry modernization as well in their ethical practices. The philanthropic initiatives at both places worked towards education/training, employment generation, collaborations/partnerships, environmental and social welfare. Volkswagen also focused on sports and, art and cultural aspects in their humanitarian responsibilities. Both the peers were on the same page regarding economic practices where the cutting costs and improving efficiency was in focus. Both Toyota and Volkswagen gave more priority to the philanthropic and ethical aspect than the economic aspect. Both the companies experienced similar outcomes from these CSR initiatives like positive financial measures, quality metrics, brand identity improvement and differentiation, worker and consumer satisfaction, risk management and aversion, improved partnership opportunities.
全球汽车制造商在亚洲的企业社会责任实践:卡罗尔模型与多案例研究方法的应用
尽管认识到可持续发展和社会责任实践的重要性,但研究人员一直未能一致确定汽车行业企业社会责任的优先领域。本研究旨在通过卡罗尔模型了解全球汽车制造商在亚洲国家开展的企业社会责任活动,研究人员希望分析全球汽车制造商的企业社会责任计划,确定企业社会责任的优先领域,并评估企业社会责任战略对全球汽车制造商经营业绩的影响。现有研究采用了案例研究法。本研究采用了多重案例研究策略,对丰田和大众两家汽车公司进行了深入研究。研究数据来自不同的结构化数据源,如公司报告、可持续发展数据记录和媒体报道。数据采用内容分析法进行分析。研究得出结论,两家公司都广泛参与了企业社会责任活动,包括道德、慈善、法律和经济责任。丰田专注于以员工为中心的生产流程和政策,大众则致力于行业现代化和道德实践。两家公司的慈善活动都致力于教育/培训、创造就业机会、合作/伙伴关系、环境和社会福利。大众汽车在履行人道主义责任的同时,还关注体育、艺术和文化领域。在经济实践方面,丰田和大众也不谋而合,都把降低成本和提高效率作为重点。与经济方面相比,丰田和大众都更重视慈善和道德方面。两家公司都从这些企业社会责任举措中获得了类似的成果,如积极的财务措施、质量指标、品牌形象的提升和差异化、工人和消费者满意度、风险管理和规避风险、改善合作机会等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信