The impact of the Countercyclical Capital Buffer on credit: Evidence from its accumulation and release before and during COVID-19

Mikel Bedayo, Jorge E. Galán
{"title":"The impact of the Countercyclical Capital Buffer on credit: Evidence from its accumulation and release before and during COVID-19","authors":"Mikel Bedayo, Jorge E. Galán","doi":"10.53479/36312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) has become a very important macroprudential tool to strengthen banks’ resilience. However, there is still limited evidence of its impact on lending over the cycle. Using data of 170 banks in 25 European Union countries, we provide a comprehensive assessment of how the CCyB release during the pandemic and its earlier accumulation impacted lending activity. We find that the CCyB has significant effects on lending, but that these effects are highly dependent on banks’ capitalization levels and, more importantly, on their headroom over regulatory requirements. We show that the release of the CCyB in response to the pandemic had a positive impact on lending, especially for banks with the lowest headroom over requirements, and that this effect was larger than the negative impact of its previous accumulation. While the CCyB accumulation had a short-term negative impact on lending for the most capital-constrained banks, this effect quickly diluted due to their enhanced solvency position, potentially allowing them to lower their cost of equity. Our results provide evidence of the benefits of the CCyB, especially in supporting lending during adverse events, while emphasising the need for policymakers to consider the heterogeneous effects across banks when deploying this tool.","PeriodicalId":296461,"journal":{"name":"Documentos de Trabajo","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documentos de Trabajo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53479/36312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) has become a very important macroprudential tool to strengthen banks’ resilience. However, there is still limited evidence of its impact on lending over the cycle. Using data of 170 banks in 25 European Union countries, we provide a comprehensive assessment of how the CCyB release during the pandemic and its earlier accumulation impacted lending activity. We find that the CCyB has significant effects on lending, but that these effects are highly dependent on banks’ capitalization levels and, more importantly, on their headroom over regulatory requirements. We show that the release of the CCyB in response to the pandemic had a positive impact on lending, especially for banks with the lowest headroom over requirements, and that this effect was larger than the negative impact of its previous accumulation. While the CCyB accumulation had a short-term negative impact on lending for the most capital-constrained banks, this effect quickly diluted due to their enhanced solvency position, potentially allowing them to lower their cost of equity. Our results provide evidence of the benefits of the CCyB, especially in supporting lending during adverse events, while emphasising the need for policymakers to consider the heterogeneous effects across banks when deploying this tool.
反周期资本缓冲对信贷的影响:从其在 COVID-19 之前和期间的积累和释放中获得的证据
反周期资本缓冲(CCyB)已成为加强银行抗风险能力的一个非常重要的宏观审慎工具。然而,有关其对周期内贷款的影响的证据仍然有限。我们利用 25 个欧盟国家 170 家银行的数据,全面评估了大流行病期间释放的 CCyB 及其早期积累对贷款活动的影响。我们发现,中央合作银行对贷款有显著影响,但这些影响在很大程度上取决于银行的资本化水平,更重要的是,取决于银行超出监管要求的余地。我们的研究表明,为应对大流行病而释放中央合作银行对贷款产生了积极影响,尤其是对超出监管要求的净空最低的银行而言,而且这种影响大于之前积累中央合作银行所产生的负面影响。虽然对于资本最紧张的银行来说,积累信用证对贷款产生了短期的负面影响,但由于其偿付能力增强,这种影响很快就被淡化了,这有可能使它们降低股本成本。我们的研究结果证明了中央合作银行的益处,尤其是在不利事件发生时支持贷款的益处,同时也强调了政策制定者在使用这一工具时需要考虑对不同银行的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信