THE WRITING PATHS OF REFLECTIVE TEACHERS

Rúbia Mara de Sousa Lapa Cunha, Fabrício Oliveira Silva
{"title":"THE WRITING PATHS OF REFLECTIVE TEACHERS","authors":"Rúbia Mara de Sousa Lapa Cunha, Fabrício Oliveira Silva","doi":"10.51249/gei.v5i02.1978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tried to investigate the contributions of writing reflective diaries for basic education teachers in the microregion of Jacobina under the eyes and sensitive listening in an action of productions authorized or not, in the records and/or signs/notes, in the activities in which referred to the preparation of training diaries (field, memorial, experiences and practices) that were to be characterized in a movement of (re)thinking didactic situations and or intervention projects or professional master's project to be configured in a cycle of reflection and redesign of their wanderings and teaching paths. Therefore, I focused on the data that were collected through questionnaires with open questions with the intention of understanding how teachers perceive themselves in this path of knowledge and experiences constructed and (re)elaborated. The data analysis showed that the students recorded the events in the notebook, demarcating their daily routines and from the perspective of a diary, immediately after the formalization of the knowledge projected in a space in the pedagogical notebook and/or notebook that depended on the school or the public sphere of activity. municipal or state. However, some carried out a detailed description of them without any “privilege” or appreciation of this route. Even so, the act of writing or doodling the praxis went beyond what was initially intended by most teachers/students or “lay” teachers, teachers considered “multipurpose” based on the distribution of the workload. The entire process of writing in class diaries or teaching plans and action plans gave us the opportunity to understand the reflection of a practice observed and aligned in one's own daily practice. It is important to mention that the entire didactic/pedagogical action was configured as a support to memory and enabled an “apparent” distance from lived experiences, allowing for a more dense analysis of these based on the formalization of knowledge in a specific research space. which we call Training Diary. Furthermore, the importance of the Teacher/trainer offering feedback, oral or written, and reflection on the reworking of the instruments used to signal events was highlighted, being systematized in a training agenda with pre-established tracks in the theoretical framework linked to a paradigm of research/action.","PeriodicalId":471911,"journal":{"name":"Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v5i02.1978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article tried to investigate the contributions of writing reflective diaries for basic education teachers in the microregion of Jacobina under the eyes and sensitive listening in an action of productions authorized or not, in the records and/or signs/notes, in the activities in which referred to the preparation of training diaries (field, memorial, experiences and practices) that were to be characterized in a movement of (re)thinking didactic situations and or intervention projects or professional master's project to be configured in a cycle of reflection and redesign of their wanderings and teaching paths. Therefore, I focused on the data that were collected through questionnaires with open questions with the intention of understanding how teachers perceive themselves in this path of knowledge and experiences constructed and (re)elaborated. The data analysis showed that the students recorded the events in the notebook, demarcating their daily routines and from the perspective of a diary, immediately after the formalization of the knowledge projected in a space in the pedagogical notebook and/or notebook that depended on the school or the public sphere of activity. municipal or state. However, some carried out a detailed description of them without any “privilege” or appreciation of this route. Even so, the act of writing or doodling the praxis went beyond what was initially intended by most teachers/students or “lay” teachers, teachers considered “multipurpose” based on the distribution of the workload. The entire process of writing in class diaries or teaching plans and action plans gave us the opportunity to understand the reflection of a practice observed and aligned in one's own daily practice. It is important to mention that the entire didactic/pedagogical action was configured as a support to memory and enabled an “apparent” distance from lived experiences, allowing for a more dense analysis of these based on the formalization of knowledge in a specific research space. which we call Training Diary. Furthermore, the importance of the Teacher/trainer offering feedback, oral or written, and reflection on the reworking of the instruments used to signal events was highlighted, being systematized in a training agenda with pre-established tracks in the theoretical framework linked to a paradigm of research/action.
反思型教师的写作之路
本文试图研究雅各比纳微型地区基础教育教师在记录和/或标志/笔记中,在授权或不 授权的制作行动中,在记录和/或标志/笔记中,在涉及编写培训日记(实地、纪念、经验和 实践)的活动中,在(重新)思考教学情境和干预项目或专业硕士项目的运动中,在反思 和重新设计他们的漫游和教学路径的循环中,撰写反思日记的贡献。因此,我把重点放在了通过开放式问题的调查问卷收集到的数据上,目的是了解教师是如何看待自己在知识和经验的建构和(重新)阐述的道路上的。数据分析显示,学生们在将知识正式投射到教学笔记本和/或取决于学校或公共活动领域的笔记本空间后,立即将事件记录在笔记本中,从日记的角度划分了他们的日常活动。然而,有些人在没有任何 "特权 "或对这一途径不屑一顾的情况下对其进行了详细描述。即便如此,书写或涂鸦实践的行为还是超出了大多数教师/学生或 "非专业 "教 师(根据工作量分配被视为 "多用途 "的教师)的初衷。在课堂日记或教学计划和行动计划中写作的整个过程,让我们有机会了解在自己的日常实践中观察和调整的实践反思。需要指出的是,整个教学/教育行动是对记忆的支持,使我们能够与生活经验保持 "明显 "的距离,从而能够在特定研究空间中对知识的形式化进行更深入的分析,我们称之为培训日记。此外,还强调了教师/培训者提供口头或书面反馈意见的重要性,以及对重新制作事件信号工具进行反思的重要性,并将其系统化,纳入与研究/行动范式相关的理论框架中预先确定轨道的培训议程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信