Impact of carbon pricing on comparative advantage in environmental goods export in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence of asymmetries from South Africa

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Chika A. Anisiuba, Hillary Chijindu Ezeaku, Samuel Manyo Takon, Maureen Ifeoma Iyke-Ofoedu, Godwin Imo Ibe, Obiamaka P. Egbo
{"title":"Impact of carbon pricing on comparative advantage in environmental goods export in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence of asymmetries from South Africa","authors":"Chika A. Anisiuba,&nbsp;Hillary Chijindu Ezeaku,&nbsp;Samuel Manyo Takon,&nbsp;Maureen Ifeoma Iyke-Ofoedu,&nbsp;Godwin Imo Ibe,&nbsp;Obiamaka P. Egbo","doi":"10.1111/1467-8268.12742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the asymmetric link between carbon pricing and the comparative advantage in environmental goods exports in South Africa from 1995 to 2021. The non-linear autoregressive distributed lag model is utilized to investigate the effects of both minor and major positive and negative fluctuations in carbon taxes, technological innovation, and energy transition on comparative advantage. The results reveal that carbon taxes have an asymmetric effect on comparative advantage in both the short and long runs, with positive shocks exerting a greater beneficial influence than negative shocks. Specifically, it is found that a 1% reduction in carbon taxes corresponds to a 1.24% decline in the response variable, whereas a 1% increase in carbon taxes is associated with a 2.72% increase in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, which is twice as large. The study also uncovers evidence of an asymmetric relationship between low-carbon technological innovation and comparative advantage in environmental goods exports. However, strong evidence of a long-run asymmetric linkage between the energy transition and comparative advantage is not established. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that a positive shift in energy transition is linked with a 0.32% rise in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, whereas a negative shift in energy transition corresponds to a 0.11% decrease. The practical policy implications are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47363,"journal":{"name":"African Development Review-Revue Africaine De Developpement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Development Review-Revue Africaine De Developpement","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8268.12742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the asymmetric link between carbon pricing and the comparative advantage in environmental goods exports in South Africa from 1995 to 2021. The non-linear autoregressive distributed lag model is utilized to investigate the effects of both minor and major positive and negative fluctuations in carbon taxes, technological innovation, and energy transition on comparative advantage. The results reveal that carbon taxes have an asymmetric effect on comparative advantage in both the short and long runs, with positive shocks exerting a greater beneficial influence than negative shocks. Specifically, it is found that a 1% reduction in carbon taxes corresponds to a 1.24% decline in the response variable, whereas a 1% increase in carbon taxes is associated with a 2.72% increase in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, which is twice as large. The study also uncovers evidence of an asymmetric relationship between low-carbon technological innovation and comparative advantage in environmental goods exports. However, strong evidence of a long-run asymmetric linkage between the energy transition and comparative advantage is not established. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that a positive shift in energy transition is linked with a 0.32% rise in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, whereas a negative shift in energy transition corresponds to a 0.11% decrease. The practical policy implications are also discussed.

碳定价对撒哈拉以南非洲环境产品出口比较优势的影响:南非的不对称证据
本文研究了 1995 年至 2021 年碳定价与南非环境产品出口比较优势之间的非对称联系。本文利用非线性自回归分布滞后模型,研究了碳税、技术创新和能源转型的小幅和大幅正负波动对比较优势的影响。结果显示,碳税对比较优势的短期和长期影响是不对称的,正向冲击比负向冲击产生的有利影响更大。具体而言,研究发现,碳税每降低 1%,响应变量就会下降 1.24%,而碳税每增加 1%,环境产品出口的比较优势就会增加 2.72%,增幅是响应变量的两倍。研究还发现了低碳技术创新与环境产品出口比较优势之间存在非对称关系的证据。不过,能源转型与比较优势之间存在长期非对称联系的有力证据并不成立。不过,值得注意的是,能源转型的积极转变与环境产品出口比较优势的 0.32% 上升相关联,而能源转型的消极转变则对应着 0.11% 的下降。本文还讨论了实际政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信