Daydreaming as spontaneous immersive imagination: A phenomenological analysis

Emily Lawson, Evan Thompson
{"title":"Daydreaming as spontaneous immersive imagination: A phenomenological analysis","authors":"Emily Lawson, Evan Thompson","doi":"10.33735/phimisci.2024.9913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nResearch on the specific features of daydreaming compared with mind-wandering and night dreaming is a neglected topic in the philosophy of mind and the cognitive neuroscience of spontaneous thought. The extant research either conflates daydreaming with mind-wandering (whether understood as task-unrelated thought, unguided attention, or disunified thought), characterizes daydreaming as opposed to mind-wandering (Dorsch, 2015), or takes daydreaming to encompass any and all “imagined events” (Newby-Clark & Thavendran, 2018). These dueling definitions obstruct future research on spontaneous thought, and are insufficiently precise to guide empirical studies. They also fail to illuminate the phenomenal core of daydreaming, namely, its dreamlike qualities. Although daydreaming is related to both mind-wandering and narrative imagination, it is not reducible to either. We argue that daydreams are experiences of spontaneous, immersive imagination in the waking state. The main task of our investigation is to distinguish daydreaming, conceptually and phenomenologically, from mind-wandering, on the one hand, and night dreaming, on the other. Although daydream experiences can vary widely, we distinguish prototypical experiences of daydreaming from adjacent imaginative activity, including fleeting imagery and “focused daydreaming,” or crafted visualization. We consider our phenomenological analysis as preparatory work for conceptually distinguishing different spontaneous and imaginative states so that they can be investigated accordingly with questionnaires and qualitative methods. We argue that precision about the phenomenal character of daydreaming can guide neurophenomenological investigations, help delimit studies on individual variance in daydreaming features, and identify differences among daydreaming, mind-wandering, and night dreaming conceptually and phenomenologically, and possibly eventually in terms of neural correlates.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":340575,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and the Mind Sciences","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and the Mind Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.9913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the specific features of daydreaming compared with mind-wandering and night dreaming is a neglected topic in the philosophy of mind and the cognitive neuroscience of spontaneous thought. The extant research either conflates daydreaming with mind-wandering (whether understood as task-unrelated thought, unguided attention, or disunified thought), characterizes daydreaming as opposed to mind-wandering (Dorsch, 2015), or takes daydreaming to encompass any and all “imagined events” (Newby-Clark & Thavendran, 2018). These dueling definitions obstruct future research on spontaneous thought, and are insufficiently precise to guide empirical studies. They also fail to illuminate the phenomenal core of daydreaming, namely, its dreamlike qualities. Although daydreaming is related to both mind-wandering and narrative imagination, it is not reducible to either. We argue that daydreams are experiences of spontaneous, immersive imagination in the waking state. The main task of our investigation is to distinguish daydreaming, conceptually and phenomenologically, from mind-wandering, on the one hand, and night dreaming, on the other. Although daydream experiences can vary widely, we distinguish prototypical experiences of daydreaming from adjacent imaginative activity, including fleeting imagery and “focused daydreaming,” or crafted visualization. We consider our phenomenological analysis as preparatory work for conceptually distinguishing different spontaneous and imaginative states so that they can be investigated accordingly with questionnaires and qualitative methods. We argue that precision about the phenomenal character of daydreaming can guide neurophenomenological investigations, help delimit studies on individual variance in daydreaming features, and identify differences among daydreaming, mind-wandering, and night dreaming conceptually and phenomenologically, and possibly eventually in terms of neural correlates.
作为自发沉浸式想象的白日梦:现象学分析
在心灵哲学和自发思维认知神经科学中,关于白日梦与思维游荡和夜梦相比的具体特征的研究是一个被忽视的课题。现存的研究要么将白日梦与思维游荡(无论是理解为与任务无关的思维、无引导的注意,还是不统一的思维)混为一谈,要么将白日梦的特征与思维游荡相对立(Dorsch,2015),要么将白日梦理解为包括任何及所有 "想象的事件"(Newby-Clark & Thavendran,2018)。这些对立的定义阻碍了未来对自发思维的研究,而且不够精确,无法指导实证研究。它们也未能阐明白日梦的现象学核心,即其梦幻般的特质。虽然白日梦与思维漫游和叙事想象都有关系,但它不能简化为其中任何一种。我们认为,白日梦是清醒状态下自发的、身临其境的想象体验。我们研究的主要任务是从概念和现象上将白日梦与思维漫游和夜梦区分开来。虽然白日梦的体验可能千差万别,但我们将白日梦的典型体验与邻近的想象活动区分开来,包括稍纵即逝的想象和 "专注的白日梦",或精心设计的可视化。我们认为,我们的现象学分析为从概念上区分不同的自发状态和想象状态做了准备工作,这样就可以通过问卷调查和定性方法对它们进行相应的研究。我们认为,白日梦现象学特征的精确性可以指导神经现象学研究,帮助界定白日梦特征的个体差异研究,并从概念和现象学上识别白日梦、思维漫游和夜梦之间的差异,最终还可能从神经相关性的角度识别这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信