Quality Assurance and In-vitro Bioequivalence Analysis of Amlodipine Besylate Tablets

Edebi N Vaikosen, Samuel J. Bunu, Samson K. Santus, O. D. Balogun, Dorcas Nyalas-Omeire
{"title":"Quality Assurance and In-vitro Bioequivalence Analysis of Amlodipine Besylate Tablets","authors":"Edebi N Vaikosen, Samuel J. Bunu, Samson K. Santus, O. D. Balogun, Dorcas Nyalas-Omeire","doi":"10.9734/ajocs/2024/v14i2302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proliferation of generic brands in the local pharmaceutical market makes it increasingly difficult for health professionals and patients to choose the optimal drug. The study aimed to assess the physicochemical parameters of generic amlodipine besylate tablets utilizing in-vitro testing to eliminate health hazards and maximize safety. Five brands (A, B, C, D, and E) of amlodipine besylate tablets (5 mg) were examined for six in-vitro tests; thickness, hardness, friability, uniformity of weight, disintegration, dissolution, and thin layer chromatography (TLC). The dissolution test revealed that Brand D had the highest percentage of drug release at 5 minutes (106.2%), followed by Brand E (103.2%), A (70.7%), B (64.4%), and C (61.0%), respectively. The spectrophotometric measurement was carried out at 240 nm. All five brands satisfied the British Pharmacopeia standard for uncoated tablet weight homogeneity (less than 5% variance) and disintegration within 15 minutes. Brand A has the longest disintegration time (4.37 minutes), whereas Brand B has the shortest (3.05). Brand E had the maximum hardness of 8.7 kg/cm², and Brand B had the lowest hardness of 3 kg/cm². All five brands had a friability percentage of less than 1%, with bread B having the highest (0.91%) and brand E, lowest (0.10%), all tablets crumbled after 15 minutes. All brands passed the quality assessment test. Conclusion: The Quality Assurance and in-vitro bioequivalence assay methods used in this study are dependable, simple, and inexpensive, and they can be used consistently to evaluate amlodipine tablets and other solid-dosage pharmaceutical products.","PeriodicalId":503889,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences","volume":"11 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajocs/2024/v14i2302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proliferation of generic brands in the local pharmaceutical market makes it increasingly difficult for health professionals and patients to choose the optimal drug. The study aimed to assess the physicochemical parameters of generic amlodipine besylate tablets utilizing in-vitro testing to eliminate health hazards and maximize safety. Five brands (A, B, C, D, and E) of amlodipine besylate tablets (5 mg) were examined for six in-vitro tests; thickness, hardness, friability, uniformity of weight, disintegration, dissolution, and thin layer chromatography (TLC). The dissolution test revealed that Brand D had the highest percentage of drug release at 5 minutes (106.2%), followed by Brand E (103.2%), A (70.7%), B (64.4%), and C (61.0%), respectively. The spectrophotometric measurement was carried out at 240 nm. All five brands satisfied the British Pharmacopeia standard for uncoated tablet weight homogeneity (less than 5% variance) and disintegration within 15 minutes. Brand A has the longest disintegration time (4.37 minutes), whereas Brand B has the shortest (3.05). Brand E had the maximum hardness of 8.7 kg/cm², and Brand B had the lowest hardness of 3 kg/cm². All five brands had a friability percentage of less than 1%, with bread B having the highest (0.91%) and brand E, lowest (0.10%), all tablets crumbled after 15 minutes. All brands passed the quality assessment test. Conclusion: The Quality Assurance and in-vitro bioequivalence assay methods used in this study are dependable, simple, and inexpensive, and they can be used consistently to evaluate amlodipine tablets and other solid-dosage pharmaceutical products.
苯磺酸氨氯地平片的质量保证和体外生物等效性分析
本地医药市场上仿制药品牌激增,使得医疗专业人员和患者越来越难以选择最佳药物。本研究旨在利用体外测试评估仿制药苯磺酸氨氯地平片的理化参数,以消除健康隐患,最大限度地提高安全性。研究对五个品牌(A、B、C、D 和 E)的苯磺酸氨氯地平片(5 毫克)进行了六项体外测试:厚度、硬度、易碎性、重量均匀性、崩解度、溶出度和薄层色谱法(TLC)。溶出度测试显示,D 牌在 5 分钟时的药物释放率最高(106.2%),其次分别是 E 牌(103.2%)、A 牌(70.7%)、B 牌(64.4%)和 C 牌(61.0%)。分光光度测量在 240 纳米波长下进行。所有五个品牌的无包衣片剂重量均一性(差异小于 5%)和 15 分钟内崩解度均符合英国药典标准。品牌 A 的崩解时间最长(4.37 分钟),而品牌 B 的崩解时间最短(3.05 分钟)。品牌 E 的硬度最高,为 8.7 千克/平方厘米,品牌 B 的硬度最低,为 3 千克/平方厘米。五个品牌的易碎率都低于 1%,其中面包 B 的易碎率最高(0.91%),品牌 E 最低(0.10%),所有药片在 15 分钟后都碎裂了。所有品牌都通过了质量评估测试。结论本研究中使用的质量保证和体外生物等效性检测方法可靠、简单、成本低廉,可持续用于评估氨氯地平片和其他固体制剂药品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信