Is Fragmentation of Prostate Core Biopsies Inevitable? A Quality Improvement Initiative.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Krithika Shenoy, Richard J. Cote, Gayathri Kini, Mary Anthes-Bartlow, Vijayalakshmi Padmanabhan
{"title":"Is Fragmentation of Prostate Core Biopsies Inevitable? A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Krithika Shenoy, Richard J. Cote, Gayathri Kini, Mary Anthes-Bartlow, Vijayalakshmi Padmanabhan","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0492-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT.—\nCore biopsies are standard of care for diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. Fragmentation makes numeric assessment of cancer challenging and increases risk of inaccurate staging with direct implications on management.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE.—\nTo determine factors responsible for fragmentation at our institution.\n\n\nDESIGN.—\nProstate core biopsies performed at 2 hospital sites during 1 week were prospectively identified. Biopsies were received in multipart formalin jars, either mounted on a nonadherent dressing pad (Telfa, Medtronic Inc) or freely suspended, and grossed by experienced pathologists' assistants. Fragmentation was defined as the difference between number of cores sent by the clinician and number of cores counted by the pathologist on microscopy.\n\n\nRESULTS.—\nForty-six cases (15 benign; 31 malignant) with 535 specimen jars were identified of which 309 of 535 (57.8%) had >1 biopsy core per jar; 230 of 535 (43%) were received mounted on Telfa and 185 of 535 (34.6%) had histologic evidence of adenocarcinoma. Overall fragmentation rate was 157 of 535 (29.3%). Lowest fragmentation rate was seen when 1 core was submitted per jar regardless of mounting method (31 of 226; 14% for single versus 126 of 309; 41% for >1 per jar; P < .001). For 1 Telfa-mounted core, rate of fragmentation was 5 of 18 (27.8%) versus 26 of 203 (12.8%) when unmounted (P = .24). Significant increase in fragmentation of Telfa-mounted cores was seen when there were 3 per jar (32 of 70; 46% mounted fragmented versus 9 of 47; 19% unmounted fragmented specimens; P = .01).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS.—\nSubmission of >1 biopsy core per jar and use of Telfa for mounting are associated with increased fragmentation. We recommend limiting submission to 1 core per jar and avoid mounting on Telfa pads.","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0492-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT.— Core biopsies are standard of care for diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. Fragmentation makes numeric assessment of cancer challenging and increases risk of inaccurate staging with direct implications on management. OBJECTIVE.— To determine factors responsible for fragmentation at our institution. DESIGN.— Prostate core biopsies performed at 2 hospital sites during 1 week were prospectively identified. Biopsies were received in multipart formalin jars, either mounted on a nonadherent dressing pad (Telfa, Medtronic Inc) or freely suspended, and grossed by experienced pathologists' assistants. Fragmentation was defined as the difference between number of cores sent by the clinician and number of cores counted by the pathologist on microscopy. RESULTS.— Forty-six cases (15 benign; 31 malignant) with 535 specimen jars were identified of which 309 of 535 (57.8%) had >1 biopsy core per jar; 230 of 535 (43%) were received mounted on Telfa and 185 of 535 (34.6%) had histologic evidence of adenocarcinoma. Overall fragmentation rate was 157 of 535 (29.3%). Lowest fragmentation rate was seen when 1 core was submitted per jar regardless of mounting method (31 of 226; 14% for single versus 126 of 309; 41% for >1 per jar; P < .001). For 1 Telfa-mounted core, rate of fragmentation was 5 of 18 (27.8%) versus 26 of 203 (12.8%) when unmounted (P = .24). Significant increase in fragmentation of Telfa-mounted cores was seen when there were 3 per jar (32 of 70; 46% mounted fragmented versus 9 of 47; 19% unmounted fragmented specimens; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS.— Submission of >1 biopsy core per jar and use of Telfa for mounting are associated with increased fragmentation. We recommend limiting submission to 1 core per jar and avoid mounting on Telfa pads.
前列腺核心活检是否不可避免?质量改进计划。
背景--核心活检是诊断和监测前列腺癌的标准方法。前列腺核心活检组织碎片使癌症的数字评估具有挑战性,并增加了分期不准确的风险,对治疗产生直接影响。目的:确定造成本院前列腺核心活检组织碎片的因素。活检组织装在多部分福尔马林罐中,安装在非粘附性敷料垫(Telfa,美敦力公司)上或自由悬挂,由经验丰富的病理学家助理进行粗检。结果:确定了 46 个病例(15 个良性病例;31 个恶性病例)共 535 个标本罐,其中 535 个标本罐中有 309 个(57.8%)每个标本罐中的活检组织大于 1 个;535 个标本罐中有 230 个标本(43%)安装在 Telfa 上,535 个标本罐中有 185 个标本(34.6%)有组织学证据显示为腺癌。535 个样本中有 157 个样本(29.3%)碎裂。无论采用哪种安装方法,每罐提交 1 个癌芯的破碎率最低(226 个中的 31 个;单个为 14%;309 个中的 126 个;每罐 >1 个为 41%;P < .001)。对于 1 个安装了 Telfa 的岩心,破碎率为 18 个中的 5 个(27.8%),而未安装时为 203 个中的 26 个(12.8%)(P = .24)。当每罐样本中有 3 份样本时,安装了 Telfa 的样本碎裂率显著增加(70 份样本中有 32 份样本碎裂;46% 的样本安装了 Telfa;47 份样本中有 9 份样本碎裂;19% 的样本未安装 Telfa;P = 0.01)。我们建议每罐只提交 1 个活检样本,并避免在 Telfa 衬垫上镶嵌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信