Selective Neural Entrainment Reveals Hierarchical Tuning to Linguistic Regularities in Reading

IF 3.6 Q1 LINGUISTICS
M. De Rosa, L. Vignali, Anna D'Urso, Maria Ktori, Roberto Bottini, Davide Crepaldi
{"title":"Selective Neural Entrainment Reveals Hierarchical Tuning to Linguistic Regularities in Reading","authors":"M. De Rosa, L. Vignali, Anna D'Urso, Maria Ktori, Roberto Bottini, Davide Crepaldi","doi":"10.1162/nol_a_00145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reading is both a visual and a linguistic task, and as such it relies on both general-purpose, visual mechanisms and more abstract, meaning-oriented processes. Disentangling the roles of these resources is of paramount importance in reading research. The present study capitalizes on the coupling of Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation (FPVS; Rossion, 2014) and MEG recordings to address this issue and investigate the role of dierent kinds of visual and linguistic units in the visual word identification system. We compared strings of pseudo-characters (BACS; C. Vidal & Chetail, 2017); strings of consonants (e.g,. sfcl); readable, but unattested strings (e.g., amsi); frequent, but non-meaningful chunks (e.g., idge); suffixes (e.g., ment); and words (e.g., vibe); and looked for discrimination responses with a particular focus on the ventral, occipito-temporal regions. The results revealed sensitivity to alphabetic, readable, familiar and lexical stimuli. Interestingly, there was no discrimination between suffixes and equally frequent, but meaningless endings, thus highlighting a lack of sensitivity to semantics. Taken together, the data suggest that the visual word identification system, at least in its early processing stages, is particularly tuned to form-based regularities, most likely reflecting its reliance on general-purpose, statistical learning mechanisms that are a core feature of the visual system as implemented in the ventral stream.","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading is both a visual and a linguistic task, and as such it relies on both general-purpose, visual mechanisms and more abstract, meaning-oriented processes. Disentangling the roles of these resources is of paramount importance in reading research. The present study capitalizes on the coupling of Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation (FPVS; Rossion, 2014) and MEG recordings to address this issue and investigate the role of dierent kinds of visual and linguistic units in the visual word identification system. We compared strings of pseudo-characters (BACS; C. Vidal & Chetail, 2017); strings of consonants (e.g,. sfcl); readable, but unattested strings (e.g., amsi); frequent, but non-meaningful chunks (e.g., idge); suffixes (e.g., ment); and words (e.g., vibe); and looked for discrimination responses with a particular focus on the ventral, occipito-temporal regions. The results revealed sensitivity to alphabetic, readable, familiar and lexical stimuli. Interestingly, there was no discrimination between suffixes and equally frequent, but meaningless endings, thus highlighting a lack of sensitivity to semantics. Taken together, the data suggest that the visual word identification system, at least in its early processing stages, is particularly tuned to form-based regularities, most likely reflecting its reliance on general-purpose, statistical learning mechanisms that are a core feature of the visual system as implemented in the ventral stream.
选择性神经诱导揭示了阅读中语言规律性的分层调谐
阅读既是一项视觉任务,也是一项语言任务,因此它既依赖于通用的视觉机制,也依赖于更为抽象的、以意义为导向的过程。在阅读研究中,厘清这些资源的作用至关重要。本研究利用快速周期性视觉刺激(FPVS;Rossion,2014 年)和 MEG 记录的耦合来解决这一问题,并研究不同类型的视觉和语言单元在视觉单词识别系统中的作用。我们比较了伪字符串(BACS;C. Vidal & Chetail,2017 年)、辅音串(例如,.sfcl)、可读但未经考证的字符串(例如,amsi)、频繁出现但无意义的词块(例如,.idge)、后缀(例如,.eg)、词根(例如,、idge)、后缀(如 ment)和单词(如 vibe);并特别关注腹侧枕颞区的辨别反应。结果显示,对字母、可读、熟悉和词汇刺激的敏感性。有趣的是,在后缀和同样频繁但无意义的词尾之间没有区别,这突出表明对语义缺乏敏感性。总之,这些数据表明,视觉单词识别系统至少在其早期处理阶段,对基于形式的规律性特别敏感,这很可能反映了它对通用统计学习机制的依赖,而这种机制是视觉系统在腹侧流中实现的核心特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Language
Neurobiology of Language Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信