Sanctification of African American Couple Relationships and Relational Forgiveness

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Antonius D. Skipper, Cassandra D. Chaney, Andrew H. Rose, Richard W. Wiley Jr, Chelsey C. Wooten, Tamecia Myers Curry, Debra Lavender-Bratcher, TJ Moore, Jordan Kennedy
{"title":"Sanctification of African American Couple Relationships and Relational Forgiveness","authors":"Antonius D. Skipper,&nbsp;Cassandra D. Chaney,&nbsp;Andrew H. Rose,&nbsp;Richard W. Wiley Jr,&nbsp;Chelsey C. Wooten,&nbsp;Tamecia Myers Curry,&nbsp;Debra Lavender-Bratcher,&nbsp;TJ Moore,&nbsp;Jordan Kennedy","doi":"10.1111/fare.13026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Using participant responses from 525 different-sex married and cohabiting African American couples, we examined the dyadic association between relational sanctification and relational forgiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Religion has a central role in the lives of many African Americans because it traditionally has been a place of refuge against stressors that disproportionally impact African Americans. However, little is known about how African American couples utilize relational sanctification as a strength.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Data were collected from African American couples between October 2019 and January 2020 as part of a larger study called the Strong African American Couples Project. Utilizing dyadic panels from Qualtrics, this project specifically targeted African American couples who were cohabiting (<i>n</i> = 233) or married (<i>n</i> = 292) thus, enabling us to analyze a multigroup actor–partner interdependence model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Significant actor effects were found between sanctification and individual as well as perceived partner forgiveness in married and cohabiting couple relationships. No significant partner effects were found.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings highlight the importance of recognizing various aspects of religiosity and spirituality within relationships, especially for African American couples with historically high rates of dissolution and self-rated religiosity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>As interventionalists work with religious and spiritual African American couples, they need to understand the role that sanctity may have within these partner relationships and the positive impact it can have on relational outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 4","pages":"2315-2332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Using participant responses from 525 different-sex married and cohabiting African American couples, we examined the dyadic association between relational sanctification and relational forgiveness.

Background

Religion has a central role in the lives of many African Americans because it traditionally has been a place of refuge against stressors that disproportionally impact African Americans. However, little is known about how African American couples utilize relational sanctification as a strength.

Method

Data were collected from African American couples between October 2019 and January 2020 as part of a larger study called the Strong African American Couples Project. Utilizing dyadic panels from Qualtrics, this project specifically targeted African American couples who were cohabiting (n = 233) or married (n = 292) thus, enabling us to analyze a multigroup actor–partner interdependence model.

Results

Significant actor effects were found between sanctification and individual as well as perceived partner forgiveness in married and cohabiting couple relationships. No significant partner effects were found.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the importance of recognizing various aspects of religiosity and spirituality within relationships, especially for African American couples with historically high rates of dissolution and self-rated religiosity.

Implications

As interventionalists work with religious and spiritual African American couples, they need to understand the role that sanctity may have within these partner relationships and the positive impact it can have on relational outcomes.

非裔美国人夫妻关系的圣化与关系宽恕
宗教在许多非裔美国人的生活中扮演着核心角色,因为宗教历来是抵御压力的庇护所,而这些压力对非裔美国人的影响尤为严重。然而,人们对非裔美国人夫妇如何利用关系圣化作为一种力量知之甚少。作为一项名为 "强大的非裔美国人夫妇项目 "的大型研究的一部分,我们在 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 1 月期间收集了非裔美国人夫妇的数据。该项目利用 Qualtrics 的二元面板,专门针对同居(n = 233)或已婚(n = 292)的非裔美国夫妇,从而使我们能够分析多组行为者-伴侣相互依存模型。在已婚和同居夫妇关系中,圣化与个人以及感知到的伴侣宽恕之间存在显著的行为者效应。这些研究结果强调了在夫妻关系中认识到宗教性和灵性的各个方面的重要性,尤其是对于解体率和自评宗教性历来较高的非裔美国夫妻而言。当干预人员与信教和有灵性的非裔美国夫妻合作时,他们需要了解神圣性在这些伴侣关系中可能扮演的角色,以及它对关系结果可能产生的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信