The Effects of Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Rate and Timing on Yield and Pre-Malt Quality of Malting Barley

J. O’Donovan, Hiroshi Kubota, K. Harker, T. Turkington, W. May, Eric N. Johnson, B. Beres, Marta Izydorczyk, Lori Oatway, H. de Gooijer, Alick Mulenga, Timothy Schwinghamer, B. Tidemann
{"title":"The Effects of Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Rate and Timing on Yield and Pre-Malt Quality of Malting Barley","authors":"J. O’Donovan, Hiroshi Kubota, K. Harker, T. Turkington, W. May, Eric N. Johnson, B. Beres, Marta Izydorczyk, Lori Oatway, H. de Gooijer, Alick Mulenga, Timothy Schwinghamer, B. Tidemann","doi":"10.1139/cjps-2023-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The production of barley cultivars with malting and brewing quality characteristics is subject to strict grading and technical standards for the end-use market. Environmental and management factors can significantly alter grain quality, and the qualities required for malting. Crop and kernel uniformity are critical factors where variability can exceed the tolerance for meeting malt quality. A practice to address variations in crop maturity is the application of pre-harvest glyphosate. Pre-harvest glyphosate applications can, however, alter malting characteristics in barley, and, if mis-timed, can also reduce yield. A four-year study at five locations in Alberta and Saskatchewan from 2013 to 2017 was conducted to determine the effects of pre-harvest glyphosate applications on malting barley characteristics. Glyphosate was applied at 900 and 1125 g ae ha-1 on malting barley cultivars ‘CDC Meredith’ and ‘AC Metcalfe’ malting barley at soft dough, hard dough, and physiological maturity growth stages. Yield reductions of up to 12% were observed from glyphosate applications at soft dough, and yield was maximized with applications at physiological maturity. Glyphosate application, at two rates, reduced percent plump kernels, but did not affect kernel weight or protein concentration. The growth stage of barley plants did not provide an accurate indicator of seed moisture levels at the time of application, which motivated our conclusion that glyphosate applications can be mistimed by inaccurate indicators. The results motivate our questioning of the utility of pre-harvest glyphosate applications, given the adverse effects to barley yield and quality observed, even when applied according to the label instructions.","PeriodicalId":502175,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Plant Science","volume":"58 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2023-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production of barley cultivars with malting and brewing quality characteristics is subject to strict grading and technical standards for the end-use market. Environmental and management factors can significantly alter grain quality, and the qualities required for malting. Crop and kernel uniformity are critical factors where variability can exceed the tolerance for meeting malt quality. A practice to address variations in crop maturity is the application of pre-harvest glyphosate. Pre-harvest glyphosate applications can, however, alter malting characteristics in barley, and, if mis-timed, can also reduce yield. A four-year study at five locations in Alberta and Saskatchewan from 2013 to 2017 was conducted to determine the effects of pre-harvest glyphosate applications on malting barley characteristics. Glyphosate was applied at 900 and 1125 g ae ha-1 on malting barley cultivars ‘CDC Meredith’ and ‘AC Metcalfe’ malting barley at soft dough, hard dough, and physiological maturity growth stages. Yield reductions of up to 12% were observed from glyphosate applications at soft dough, and yield was maximized with applications at physiological maturity. Glyphosate application, at two rates, reduced percent plump kernels, but did not affect kernel weight or protein concentration. The growth stage of barley plants did not provide an accurate indicator of seed moisture levels at the time of application, which motivated our conclusion that glyphosate applications can be mistimed by inaccurate indicators. The results motivate our questioning of the utility of pre-harvest glyphosate applications, given the adverse effects to barley yield and quality observed, even when applied according to the label instructions.
收获前草甘膦用量和时间对麦芽大麦产量和麦芽前质量的影响
生产具有发芽和酿造品质特征的大麦品种,必须严格遵守最终用途市场的分级和技术标准。环境和管理因素会极大地改变谷物质量和发芽所需的品质。作物和籽粒的均匀性是关键因素,其变化可能超出麦芽质量的容许范围。解决作物成熟度变化的一种做法是在收获前施用草甘膦。然而,收获前施用草甘膦会改变大麦的麦芽特性,如果时机不当,还会降低产量。2013 年至 2017 年,在艾伯塔省和萨斯喀彻温省的五个地点开展了一项为期四年的研究,以确定收获前施用草甘膦对大麦发芽特性的影响。在麦芽栽培品种 "CDC Meredith "和 "AC Metcalfe "的软面团、硬面团和生理成熟生长阶段施用草甘膦,施用量分别为 900 g ae ha-1 和 1125 g ae ha-1。在软面团生长阶段施用草甘膦可使产量减少 12%,而在生理成熟阶段施用草甘膦可使产量最大化。草甘膦的两种施用量都会降低籽粒的饱满度,但不会影响籽粒重量或蛋白质浓度。大麦植株的生长阶段并不能提供施药时种子水分水平的准确指标,这促使我们得出结论:草甘膦的施用可能会被不准确的指标误导。考虑到即使按照标签说明施用草甘膦,也会对大麦产量和质量产生不利影响,这些结果促使我们对收获前施用草甘膦的效用提出质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信