EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL VERSUS ORAL PIROXICAM IN MANAGEMENT OF POST-SURGICAL PAIN, SWELLING AND TRISMUS AFTER LOWER 3RD MOLAR SURGERY- A RANDOMIZED CONTROL CLINICAL TRIAL

Dr. Shweta Ashok, Dr. Pradeep Devadoss, Dr. Keerthana Ponvel, Dr. R. S. Neelakandan, Dr. Srinisava Prasad Tangutur
{"title":"EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL VERSUS ORAL PIROXICAM IN MANAGEMENT OF POST-SURGICAL PAIN, SWELLING AND TRISMUS AFTER LOWER 3RD MOLAR SURGERY- A RANDOMIZED CONTROL CLINICAL TRIAL","authors":"Dr. Shweta Ashok, Dr. Pradeep Devadoss, Dr. Keerthana Ponvel, Dr. R. S. Neelakandan, Dr. Srinisava Prasad Tangutur","doi":"10.55640/ijmsdh-10-04-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background of the study: Third molar surgical removal is a common procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery, causing moderate to severe pain, swelling, and trismus. Postoperative pain control improves patient recovery and oral function, with commonly used analgesics including Ibuprofen, Aceclofenac, Ketorolac, Tramadol, Paracetamol, Nalbuphine, Nimusulide, and Buprenorphine. Aim and Objective: The study compares oral and sub-lingual Piroxicam for managing post-surgical pain after extraction of impacted third molars, focusing on analgesia onset, pain intensity, swelling, and trismus degree. Materials and method: A randomized control trial was conducted on 30 patients who underwent surgical removal of mandibular impacted third molars. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (Study) and Group II (Control). All patients underwent the procedure by a single surgeon. Post-operative medications were prescribed according to the study design, with Piroxicam 20mg administered sub-lingually (Group I) and 20mg orally (Group II). The parameters were assessed and measured for both groups, and the results and statistical analysis were compared. Result: The results revealed that the inter-group difference for the post-operative symptoms evaluated using a t-test for Equality of means by comparing the pre-op, POD 2, POD 7 values was statistically significant. Mean onset time taken and pain perception by Group I (Sub-lingual) in the first dose was 32.3 minutes and for Group II was 51.21 minutes which was established to be significantly (P<0.05) low for the sub-lingual group by statistical analysis. Conclusion: The study found that the sublingual route of administering Piroxicam had a faster onset of action and better analgesia postoperatively compared to the oral route. This is crucial for patients and surgeons to improve compliance and comfort post-operatively after impaction surgery, as potent analgesics are essential for effective pain management.","PeriodicalId":503011,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-10-04-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background of the study: Third molar surgical removal is a common procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery, causing moderate to severe pain, swelling, and trismus. Postoperative pain control improves patient recovery and oral function, with commonly used analgesics including Ibuprofen, Aceclofenac, Ketorolac, Tramadol, Paracetamol, Nalbuphine, Nimusulide, and Buprenorphine. Aim and Objective: The study compares oral and sub-lingual Piroxicam for managing post-surgical pain after extraction of impacted third molars, focusing on analgesia onset, pain intensity, swelling, and trismus degree. Materials and method: A randomized control trial was conducted on 30 patients who underwent surgical removal of mandibular impacted third molars. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I (Study) and Group II (Control). All patients underwent the procedure by a single surgeon. Post-operative medications were prescribed according to the study design, with Piroxicam 20mg administered sub-lingually (Group I) and 20mg orally (Group II). The parameters were assessed and measured for both groups, and the results and statistical analysis were compared. Result: The results revealed that the inter-group difference for the post-operative symptoms evaluated using a t-test for Equality of means by comparing the pre-op, POD 2, POD 7 values was statistically significant. Mean onset time taken and pain perception by Group I (Sub-lingual) in the first dose was 32.3 minutes and for Group II was 51.21 minutes which was established to be significantly (P<0.05) low for the sub-lingual group by statistical analysis. Conclusion: The study found that the sublingual route of administering Piroxicam had a faster onset of action and better analgesia postoperatively compared to the oral route. This is crucial for patients and surgeons to improve compliance and comfort post-operatively after impaction surgery, as potent analgesics are essential for effective pain management.
舌下含服吡罗昔康与口服吡罗昔康治疗下第三磨牙手术后疼痛、肿胀和践踏的疗效--随机对照临床试验
研究背景:第三磨牙手术切除是口腔颌面外科的常见手术,会引起中度至重度疼痛、肿胀和咀嚼功能障碍。术后疼痛控制可改善患者的恢复和口腔功能,常用的镇痛药包括布洛芬、醋氯芬酸、酮洛酸、曲马多、扑热息痛、纳布啡、尼木舒利和丁丙诺啡。目的和目标:本研究比较了口服和舌下含服吡罗昔康对拔除撞击性第三磨牙术后疼痛的治疗效果,重点关注镇痛起效、疼痛强度、肿胀和咀嚼障碍程度。材料和方法:对 30 名接受下颌撞击性第三磨牙拔除手术的患者进行了随机对照试验。患者分为两组:第一组(研究组)和第二组(对照组)。所有患者均由一名外科医生进行手术。根据研究设计开具了术后药物处方,其中舌下含服吡罗昔康 20 毫克(I 组),口服 20 毫克(II 组)。对两组的参数进行评估和测量,并对结果和统计分析进行比较。结果结果显示,通过比较术前、POD 2、POD 7 的数值,采用均值 t 检验法评估的术后症状组间差异具有统计学意义。第一组(亚语言组)第一次用药的平均起效时间和疼痛感为 32.3 分钟,第二组为 51.21 分钟,经统计分析,亚语言组的起效时间和疼痛感明显较低(P<0.05)。结论研究发现,与口服途径相比,舌下途径给药的吡罗昔康起效更快,术后镇痛效果更好。这对患者和外科医生来说至关重要,因为强效镇痛剂是有效控制疼痛的关键,可提高患者和外科医生的依从性和术后舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信