Sex Differences in Outcomes of Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for the Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

A. Noordman, M. Rienstra, Y. Blaauw, B. Mulder, Alexander H. Maass
{"title":"Sex Differences in Outcomes of Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for the Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.","authors":"A. Noordman, M. Rienstra, Y. Blaauw, B. Mulder, Alexander H. Maass","doi":"10.3390/jcdd11040116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention, sex differences may exist in clinical outcomes. We sought to investigate sex differences in appropriate ICD therapy, appropriate and inappropriate shock, and all-cause mortality in this patient population. Methods: A total of 257 patients who received an ICD for a secondary prevention indication in the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively included in a consecutive manner. Appropriate ICD therapy, comprising shock and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), was the primary outcome. Results: The patient population included 257 patients, of whom 45 (18%) were women and 212 (82%) were men. The median of the age was 64 (interquartile range (IQR) 53-72) years. During follow-up (median duration 6.2 (IQR 4.8-7.8) years), first appropriate device therapy took place in 10 (22%) patients for women and 85 (40%) patients for men. Female sex was negatively associated with the rate of appropriate ICD therapy, univariably (hazard ratio (HR) 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.93]; p = 0.030) and multivariably (HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20-0.95]; p = 0.036). Conclusions: Women with secondary prevention ICDs were less likely than men to receive appropriate ICD therapy.","PeriodicalId":502527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11040116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention, sex differences may exist in clinical outcomes. We sought to investigate sex differences in appropriate ICD therapy, appropriate and inappropriate shock, and all-cause mortality in this patient population. Methods: A total of 257 patients who received an ICD for a secondary prevention indication in the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively included in a consecutive manner. Appropriate ICD therapy, comprising shock and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT), was the primary outcome. Results: The patient population included 257 patients, of whom 45 (18%) were women and 212 (82%) were men. The median of the age was 64 (interquartile range (IQR) 53-72) years. During follow-up (median duration 6.2 (IQR 4.8-7.8) years), first appropriate device therapy took place in 10 (22%) patients for women and 85 (40%) patients for men. Female sex was negatively associated with the rate of appropriate ICD therapy, univariably (hazard ratio (HR) 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.93]; p = 0.030) and multivariably (HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20-0.95]; p = 0.036). Conclusions: Women with secondary prevention ICDs were less likely than men to receive appropriate ICD therapy.
植入心律转复除颤器用于心脏性猝死二级预防的患者预后的性别差异。
背景:在使用植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)进行二级预防的患者中,临床结果可能存在性别差异。我们试图研究这一患者群体在适当的 ICD 治疗、适当和不适当的电击以及全因死亡率方面的性别差异。研究方法回顾性连续纳入了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间在格罗宁根大学医疗中心(UMCG)接受 ICD 用于二级预防的 257 名患者。主要结果是对室颤(VF)或室速(VT)进行适当的 ICD 治疗,包括电击和抗心动过速起搏(ATP)。结果患者总数为 257 人,其中女性 45 人(占 18%),男性 212 人(占 82%)。年龄中位数为 64 岁(四分位距(IQR)53-72)。在随访期间(中位数时间为 6.2(IQR 4.8-7.8)年),10 名女性患者(22%)和 85 名男性患者(40%)首次接受了适当的装置治疗。女性性别与 ICD 适当治疗率呈负相关,单变量(危险比 (HR) 0.48 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.25-0.93];P = 0.030)和多变量(HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20-0.95];P = 0.036)。结论与男性相比,患有二级预防性 ICD 的女性接受适当 ICD 治疗的可能性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信