A crossover study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of hydroxychloroquine tablets in healthy Chinese subjects.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jie Feng, Shuang-yu Kuang, Jun-Han Wan, Rong Li, Yi-Jie Zhu, Bei-Lei Cai, Lei Guan, Zheng Zhang
{"title":"A crossover study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of hydroxychloroquine tablets in healthy Chinese subjects.","authors":"Jie Feng, Shuang-yu Kuang, Jun-Han Wan, Rong Li, Yi-Jie Zhu, Bei-Lei Cai, Lei Guan, Zheng Zhang","doi":"10.5414/CP204406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nHydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has a high variability and a long half-life in the human body. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a generic HCQ tablet (test preparation) versus a brand HCQ tablet (reference preparation) under fasting and fed conditions in a crossover design.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThis was an open-label, two-period randomized, single-dose, crossover study in 47 healthy Chinese subjects who were sequentially and randomly allocated either to the fed group (high-fat meal; n = 23) or the fasting group (n = 24). Participants in each group were randomized to the two arms to receive either a single 200-mg dose of the test preparation or a 200-mg dose of the reference preparation. The application of the two preparations in each patient was separated by a 28-day washout period, regarded as sufficiently long to avoid significant interference from residual drug in the body. Whole blood samples were collected over 72 hours after drug administration.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 23 subjects completed both the fed and the fasting parts of the trial. There were no significant differences in Cmax, AUC0-72h, and T1/2 between the test and reference preparation (p > 0.05). Food had no significant effect on Cmax and T1/2 (p > 0.05), but AUC0-72h values were significantly reduced under fed condition compared to fasting condition (p < 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax and AUC0-72h were 0.84 - 1.05 and 0.89 - 0.98 in the fed study, and 0.97 - 1.07 and 0.97 - 1.05 in the fasting study, respectively. The carryover effect due to non-zero blood concentrations resulted in higher AUC0-72h values in the second period for both test and reference formulations and had no effect on the statistical results. No serious adverse events were reported.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe investigation demonstrated that the test and reference preparations are bioequivalent and well tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects.","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIMS Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has a high variability and a long half-life in the human body. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a generic HCQ tablet (test preparation) versus a brand HCQ tablet (reference preparation) under fasting and fed conditions in a crossover design. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an open-label, two-period randomized, single-dose, crossover study in 47 healthy Chinese subjects who were sequentially and randomly allocated either to the fed group (high-fat meal; n = 23) or the fasting group (n = 24). Participants in each group were randomized to the two arms to receive either a single 200-mg dose of the test preparation or a 200-mg dose of the reference preparation. The application of the two preparations in each patient was separated by a 28-day washout period, regarded as sufficiently long to avoid significant interference from residual drug in the body. Whole blood samples were collected over 72 hours after drug administration. RESULTS A total of 23 subjects completed both the fed and the fasting parts of the trial. There were no significant differences in Cmax, AUC0-72h, and T1/2 between the test and reference preparation (p > 0.05). Food had no significant effect on Cmax and T1/2 (p > 0.05), but AUC0-72h values were significantly reduced under fed condition compared to fasting condition (p < 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax and AUC0-72h were 0.84 - 1.05 and 0.89 - 0.98 in the fed study, and 0.97 - 1.07 and 0.97 - 1.05 in the fasting study, respectively. The carryover effect due to non-zero blood concentrations resulted in higher AUC0-72h values in the second period for both test and reference formulations and had no effect on the statistical results. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION The investigation demonstrated that the test and reference preparations are bioequivalent and well tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects.
评估羟氯喹片剂在中国健康受试者中的药代动力学和生物等效性的交叉研究。
目的羟氯喹(HCQ)在人体内的变异性大,半衰期长。材料与方法这是一项开放标签、两阶段随机、单剂量、交叉研究,47 名健康的中国受试者按顺序被随机分配到进食组(高脂餐;n = 23)或禁食组(n = 24)。每组受试者被随机分配到两组,分别接受单次 200 毫克剂量的试验制剂或 200 毫克剂量的参考制剂。每名患者使用两种制剂之间有 28 天的冲洗期,冲洗期足够长,可避免体内残留药物的严重干扰。结果共有 23 名受试者完成了试验的进食和禁食部分。试验制剂和参照制剂的 Cmax、AUC0-72h 和 T1/2 无明显差异(p > 0.05)。食物对 Cmax 和 T1/2 没有明显影响(p > 0.05),但与空腹状态相比,进食状态下的 AUC0-72h 值明显降低(p < 0.05)。在喂养研究中,Cmax 和 AUC0-72h 的几何平均比 (GMR) 的 90% 置信区间 (CI) 分别为 0.84 - 1.05 和 0.89 - 0.98;在空腹研究中,分别为 0.97 - 1.07 和 0.97 - 1.05。由于血药浓度不为零而产生的携带效应导致试验制剂和参比制剂在第二阶段的 AUC0-72h 值较高,但对统计结果没有影响。调查表明,在中国健康受试者的空腹和进食条件下,试验制剂和参比制剂具有生物等效性和良好的耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信