Determinants of psychological injury among health and social care workers in community settings: A systematic review.

Work Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.3233/WOR-230426
A. Gelaw, Sharon Parker, Anya Johnson, Helena Nguyen, Anu Jolly, Vivien W. Forner, Connie Deng, A. Collie
{"title":"Determinants of psychological injury among health and social care workers in community settings: A systematic review.","authors":"A. Gelaw, Sharon Parker, Anya Johnson, Helena Nguyen, Anu Jolly, Vivien W. Forner, Connie Deng, A. Collie","doi":"10.3233/WOR-230426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nHealth and Social Care (HSC) workers face psychological health risks in the workplace. While many studies have described psychological injuries in HSC workers, few have examined the determinants. Previous research has primarily focused on hospitals, lacking systematic reviews of community-based settings.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo systematically identify and appraise current evidence on the determinants of psychological injuries among HSC workers in community settings.\n\n\nMETHODS\nSearches were conducted in three bibliographic databases, supplemented by citation searches. Included studies focused on community-based HSC workers, reporting statistical associations between psychological injury and personal, health, occupational, or organizational factors. Quantitative studies published in English between January 1, 2000 and August 15, 2023 were included. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the JBI critical appraisal checklist.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSixty-six studies were included. Study quality was highly variable, and all studies were cross-sectional. Twenty-three studies linked psychological injury with occupational factors (e.g. low job control, high job demands and low job satisfaction). Thirteen studies observed an association between work environment and psychological injury, and a further eleven between workplace social support and psychological injury. Fewer studies have examined the relationship between psychological injury and personal/individual factors.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOccupational and organisational factors are significantly associated with psychological health among HSA workers, in community settings. These aspects of job design, work environment and workplace relationships are modifiable, suggesting an opportunity for work design interventions to improve workers' psychological health and reduce the prevalence of psychological injury in this sector.","PeriodicalId":506534,"journal":{"name":"Work","volume":"69 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Health and Social Care (HSC) workers face psychological health risks in the workplace. While many studies have described psychological injuries in HSC workers, few have examined the determinants. Previous research has primarily focused on hospitals, lacking systematic reviews of community-based settings. OBJECTIVE To systematically identify and appraise current evidence on the determinants of psychological injuries among HSC workers in community settings. METHODS Searches were conducted in three bibliographic databases, supplemented by citation searches. Included studies focused on community-based HSC workers, reporting statistical associations between psychological injury and personal, health, occupational, or organizational factors. Quantitative studies published in English between January 1, 2000 and August 15, 2023 were included. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the JBI critical appraisal checklist. RESULTS Sixty-six studies were included. Study quality was highly variable, and all studies were cross-sectional. Twenty-three studies linked psychological injury with occupational factors (e.g. low job control, high job demands and low job satisfaction). Thirteen studies observed an association between work environment and psychological injury, and a further eleven between workplace social support and psychological injury. Fewer studies have examined the relationship between psychological injury and personal/individual factors. CONCLUSION Occupational and organisational factors are significantly associated with psychological health among HSA workers, in community settings. These aspects of job design, work environment and workplace relationships are modifiable, suggesting an opportunity for work design interventions to improve workers' psychological health and reduce the prevalence of psychological injury in this sector.
社区卫生和社会护理工作者心理伤害的决定因素:系统综述。
背景健康和社会护理(HSC)工作者在工作场所面临心理健康风险。虽然有许多研究描述了健康与社会护理工作者的心理伤害,但很少有研究对其决定因素进行了研究。以前的研究主要集中在医院,缺乏对社区环境的系统回顾。目的系统地识别和评估当前关于社区环境中健康与社会护理工作者心理伤害决定因素的证据。方法在三个文献数据库中进行搜索,并辅以引文检索。所纳入的研究主要针对社区健康护理工作者,报告了心理伤害与个人、健康、职业或组织因素之间的统计关联。研究纳入了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 15 日期间用英语发表的定量研究。采用 JBI 临界评估核对表进行质量评估。研究质量参差不齐,所有研究均为横断面研究。23 项研究将心理伤害与职业因素(如低工作控制力、高工作要求和低工作满意度)联系起来。有 13 项研究发现工作环境与心理伤害有关,另有 11 项研究发现工作场所的社会支持与心理伤害有关。对心理伤害与个人/个体因素之间关系的研究较少。结论在社区环境中,职业和组织因素与从事健康服务业的工作人员的心理健康密切相关。工作设计、工作环境和工作场所关系的这些方面是可以改变的,这表明工作设计干预措施有机会改善工人的心理健康并降低该行业的心理伤害发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信