Effect of different material constitutive models in estimating the residual moment capacity of RC beams subjected to natural corrosion

IF 3.5 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kryzelle M. Atienza, Apollo E. Malabanan, Ariel Miguel M. Aragoncillo, Carmina B. Borja, M. Madlangbayan, Emel Ken D. Benito
{"title":"Effect of different material constitutive models in estimating the residual moment capacity of RC beams subjected to natural corrosion","authors":"Kryzelle M. Atienza, Apollo E. Malabanan, Ariel Miguel M. Aragoncillo, Carmina B. Borja, M. Madlangbayan, Emel Ken D. Benito","doi":"10.1108/ijsi-01-2024-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeExisting deterministic models that predict the capacity of corroded reinforced concrete (RC) beams have limited applicability because they were based on accelerated tests that induce general corrosion. This research gap was addressed by performing a combined numerical and statistical analysis on RC beams, subjected to natural corrosion, to achieve a much better forecast.Design/methodology/approachData of 42 naturally corroded beams were collected from the literature and analyzed numerically. Four constitutive models and their combinations were considered: the elastic-semi-plastic and elastic-perfectly-plastic models for steel, and two tensile models for concrete with and without the post-cracking stresses. Meanwhile, Popovics’ model was used to describe the behavior of concrete under compression. Corrosion coefficients were developed as functions of corrosion degree and beam parameters through linear regression analysis to fit the theoretical moment capacities with test data. The performance of the coefficients derived from different combinations of constitutive laws was then compared and validated.FindingsThe results showed that the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.90) was achieved when the tensile response of concrete was modeled without the residual stresses after cracking and the steel was analyzed as an elastic-perfectly-plastic material. The proposed procedure and regression model also showed reasonable agreement with experimental data, even performing better than the current models derived from accelerated tests and traditional procedures.Originality/valueThis study presents a simple but reliable approach for quantifying the capacity of RC beams under more realistic conditions than previously reported. This method is simple and requires only a few variables to be employed. Civil engineers can use it to obtain a quick and rough estimate of the structural condition of corroding RC beams.","PeriodicalId":45359,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Structural Integrity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsi-01-2024-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeExisting deterministic models that predict the capacity of corroded reinforced concrete (RC) beams have limited applicability because they were based on accelerated tests that induce general corrosion. This research gap was addressed by performing a combined numerical and statistical analysis on RC beams, subjected to natural corrosion, to achieve a much better forecast.Design/methodology/approachData of 42 naturally corroded beams were collected from the literature and analyzed numerically. Four constitutive models and their combinations were considered: the elastic-semi-plastic and elastic-perfectly-plastic models for steel, and two tensile models for concrete with and without the post-cracking stresses. Meanwhile, Popovics’ model was used to describe the behavior of concrete under compression. Corrosion coefficients were developed as functions of corrosion degree and beam parameters through linear regression analysis to fit the theoretical moment capacities with test data. The performance of the coefficients derived from different combinations of constitutive laws was then compared and validated.FindingsThe results showed that the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.90) was achieved when the tensile response of concrete was modeled without the residual stresses after cracking and the steel was analyzed as an elastic-perfectly-plastic material. The proposed procedure and regression model also showed reasonable agreement with experimental data, even performing better than the current models derived from accelerated tests and traditional procedures.Originality/valueThis study presents a simple but reliable approach for quantifying the capacity of RC beams under more realistic conditions than previously reported. This method is simple and requires only a few variables to be employed. Civil engineers can use it to obtain a quick and rough estimate of the structural condition of corroding RC beams.
不同材料构成模型在估算受自然腐蚀的钢筋混凝土梁残余弯矩承载力中的影响
目的 预测腐蚀钢筋混凝土 (RC) 梁承载能力的现有确定性模型的适用性有限,因为这些模型是基于诱发普遍腐蚀的加速试验。为了弥补这一研究空白,我们对受到自然腐蚀的钢筋混凝土梁进行了数值和统计综合分析,以获得更好的预测结果。 设计/方法/途径 我们从文献中收集了 42 个自然腐蚀梁的数据,并对其进行了数值分析。考虑了四种构成模型及其组合:钢材的弹性-半弹性模型和弹性-完全弹性模型,以及混凝土的两种拉伸模型(含开裂后应力和不含开裂后应力)。同时,Popovics 模型用于描述混凝土在压缩条件下的行为。通过线性回归分析,将锈蚀系数发展为锈蚀程度和梁参数的函数,从而将理论弯矩承载力与试验数据相匹配。结果表明,在不考虑开裂后残余应力的情况下建立混凝土拉伸响应模型,并将钢材作为弹性-完全塑性材料进行分析时,精确度最高(R2 = 0.90)。所提出的程序和回归模型也显示出与实验数据的合理一致性,甚至优于目前通过加速试验和传统程序得出的模型。这种方法很简单,只需使用几个变量。土木工程师可以用它来快速粗略地估算锈蚀 RC 梁的结构状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Structural Integrity
International Journal of Structural Integrity ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.80%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信