Comparison of Conservative and Surgical Treatment in Patients with Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease

Arslan Arshad, Asihaerjiang Maimaitiyiming, Guoqing Li, B. Ji, Tianxing Wang
{"title":"Comparison of Conservative and Surgical Treatment in Patients with Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease","authors":"Arslan Arshad, Asihaerjiang Maimaitiyiming, Guoqing Li, B. Ji, Tianxing Wang","doi":"10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The overall main purpose of this study is to add some knowledge on the treatment of LCPD, with a main focus on the comparison between conservative and surgical treatments of Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease (LCPD). And a brief overview of the complications of these treatments. Methods: A retrospective cohort method was used in this study. A total number of 53 patients were registered with LCPD, at the first affiliated hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Out of these 53 patients, 39 patients were included in this study, rest of 14 patients couldn’t be included due to missed data or loss of contact. For the comparison of results, a modified form of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used for the clinical assessment of hip function. Radiographs were also used for the evaluation. The radiological assessment was made by the use of CE and CCD angles. The main classification system, which was used for the evaluation, staging, and prognosis of hip function, was Stulberg’s classification. Statistical analysis was done by using the SPSS 23.0 version. A simple t-test was used for data analysis. Results: The clinical results supported our hypothesis that surgical treatment is a better choice of treatment than conservative treatment in patients with LCPD. However, the statistical data from radiographic assessment showed no significant difference between conservative and surgical treatment in patients with LCPD. The statistical data showed that both conservative and surgical treatment had significant p-values (<0.05) when compared results at the final follow-up check with that before starting treatment. So conservative treatment can be used as an alternative to surgical treatment in patients with Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease. Conclusion: From the statistical analysis of data, we concluded that there is no significant difference between outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment in patients with Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease (LCPD). So conservative treatment can be ........","PeriodicalId":471520,"journal":{"name":"Scholars journal of applied medical sciences","volume":"19 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars journal of applied medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i04.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The overall main purpose of this study is to add some knowledge on the treatment of LCPD, with a main focus on the comparison between conservative and surgical treatments of Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease (LCPD). And a brief overview of the complications of these treatments. Methods: A retrospective cohort method was used in this study. A total number of 53 patients were registered with LCPD, at the first affiliated hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Out of these 53 patients, 39 patients were included in this study, rest of 14 patients couldn’t be included due to missed data or loss of contact. For the comparison of results, a modified form of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used for the clinical assessment of hip function. Radiographs were also used for the evaluation. The radiological assessment was made by the use of CE and CCD angles. The main classification system, which was used for the evaluation, staging, and prognosis of hip function, was Stulberg’s classification. Statistical analysis was done by using the SPSS 23.0 version. A simple t-test was used for data analysis. Results: The clinical results supported our hypothesis that surgical treatment is a better choice of treatment than conservative treatment in patients with LCPD. However, the statistical data from radiographic assessment showed no significant difference between conservative and surgical treatment in patients with LCPD. The statistical data showed that both conservative and surgical treatment had significant p-values (<0.05) when compared results at the final follow-up check with that before starting treatment. So conservative treatment can be used as an alternative to surgical treatment in patients with Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease. Conclusion: From the statistical analysis of data, we concluded that there is no significant difference between outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment in patients with Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease (LCPD). So conservative treatment can be ........
对 Legg-Calve-Perthes 疾病患者进行保守治疗和手术治疗的比较
研究目的:本研究的主要目的是补充有关 LCPD 治疗的一些知识,重点是比较 Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease(LCPD)的保守治疗和手术治疗。并简要概述这些治疗方法的并发症。方法:本研究采用回顾性队列方法。新疆医科大学第一附属医院共登记了 53 名 LCPD 患者。在这 53 名患者中,39 名患者被纳入本研究,其余 14 名患者因遗漏数据或失去联系而未能纳入本研究。为了比较研究结果,我们采用了哈里斯髋关节评分(Harris Hip Score,HHS)的改良版来对髋关节功能进行临床评估。此外,还使用了 X 光片进行评估。通过 CE 角和 CCD 角进行放射学评估。用于髋关节功能评估、分期和预后的主要分类系统是 Stulberg 分类法。统计分析采用 SPSS 23.0 版本。数据分析采用简单的 t 检验。结果临床结果支持了我们的假设,即对于 LCPD 患者,手术治疗是比保守治疗更好的治疗选择。然而,放射学评估的统计数据显示,LCPD 患者的保守治疗和手术治疗没有明显差异。统计数据显示,保守治疗和手术治疗的最终随访检查结果与开始治疗前的结果相比,P 值均显著(<0.05)。因此,保守治疗可替代手术治疗。结论通过对数据进行统计分析,我们得出结论:对于 Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease(LCPD)患者,保守治疗和手术治疗的结果没有明显差异。因此,保守治疗可........。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信