POLITICAL CONFLICT AND COMPROMISE IN THE JOB CREATION BILL DISCUSSION

M. M. Masrur, Article Info
{"title":"POLITICAL CONFLICT AND COMPROMISE IN THE JOB CREATION BILL DISCUSSION","authors":"M. M. Masrur, Article Info","doi":"10.53625/ijss.v3i6.7637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory reform by amending various provisions in dozens of laws into a single Omnibus Law on Job Creation has been rejected because it is considered to eliminate protection for workers/labourers, and expand the dominance of employers. The wave of rejection continues to strengthen, raising questions about the process of political communication, conflict and negotiation, and political compromise between political forces in the DPR (Parliamentary Institutions). With a constructiveist paradigm and case study method, and supported by several theories from political science, political communication, negotiation theory, conflict theory, as well as several concepts regarding political compromise, the results showed that political communication in the discussion of the Job Creation Bill took place systematically by placing the authority of political parties as decision makers. Political conflict occurs due to inflexible negotiations. Political negotiations carried out through a principle-based negotiations approach, although it can accelerate the discussion process, is unable to guarantee the effectiveness of political compromise. The Job Creation Bill comes as an orthodox legal product and was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. Four things that become the findings of this research are (1) the dynamics of political communication are strongly influenced by the presidential-multiparty political system that produces majoritarian power, so that it has consequences for political alignments; (2) political conflicts that arise due to polarisation of political support have presented inflexible political communication, (3) principle-based political negotiations are pragmatically able to accelerate discussions but do not guarantee resistance/rejection by the public; and (4) political compromise through the stages of strategy development, relationship management, and decision making, cannot be a form of agreement that can accommodate all parties","PeriodicalId":505993,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Science","volume":"5 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v3i6.7637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulatory reform by amending various provisions in dozens of laws into a single Omnibus Law on Job Creation has been rejected because it is considered to eliminate protection for workers/labourers, and expand the dominance of employers. The wave of rejection continues to strengthen, raising questions about the process of political communication, conflict and negotiation, and political compromise between political forces in the DPR (Parliamentary Institutions). With a constructiveist paradigm and case study method, and supported by several theories from political science, political communication, negotiation theory, conflict theory, as well as several concepts regarding political compromise, the results showed that political communication in the discussion of the Job Creation Bill took place systematically by placing the authority of political parties as decision makers. Political conflict occurs due to inflexible negotiations. Political negotiations carried out through a principle-based negotiations approach, although it can accelerate the discussion process, is unable to guarantee the effectiveness of political compromise. The Job Creation Bill comes as an orthodox legal product and was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. Four things that become the findings of this research are (1) the dynamics of political communication are strongly influenced by the presidential-multiparty political system that produces majoritarian power, so that it has consequences for political alignments; (2) political conflicts that arise due to polarisation of political support have presented inflexible political communication, (3) principle-based political negotiations are pragmatically able to accelerate discussions but do not guarantee resistance/rejection by the public; and (4) political compromise through the stages of strategy development, relationship management, and decision making, cannot be a form of agreement that can accommodate all parties
创造就业法案讨论中的政治冲突与妥协
通过将数十部法律中的各种条款修订为一部单一的《创造就业总括法》而进行的监管改革遭到了否决,因为它被认为会取消对工人/劳动者的保护,并扩大雇主的主导地位。否决浪潮仍在继续加强,从而引发了对政治沟通、冲突和谈判进程以及各政治力量在人民民主联盟(议会机构)中的政治妥协的质疑。在建构主义范式和案例研究方法的支持下,在政治学、政治沟通、谈判理论、冲突理论以及有关政治妥协的若干概念的支持下,研究结果表明,在《创造就业法案》的讨论中,政治沟通是通过将政党的权威作为决策者而系统进行的。政治冲突的发生是由于谈判缺乏灵活性。通过基于原则的谈判方式进行的政治谈判虽然可以加快讨论进程,但却无法保证政治妥协的有效性。创造就业法案》是正统的法律产物,被宪法法院宣布为违宪。本研究的四个发现是:(1)政治沟通的动力受到总统-多党政治体制的强烈影响,这种体制产生了多数派权力,从而对政治结盟产生了影响;(2) 因政治支持两极化而产生的政治冲突使政治沟通缺乏灵活性;(3) 以原则为基础的政治谈判能够加快讨论的进程,但并不能保证公众的抵制/拒绝;(4) 通过战略制定、关系管理和决策等阶段达成的政治妥协不可能成为一种能够容纳所有各方的协议形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信