RAPID ON-SITE EVALUATION AND MICRONUCLEUS SCORING IN BREAST LESIONS FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOPATHOLOGY BY NEW IAC YOKOHAMA SYSTEM OF REPORTING

Samriti Goyal, Mohanvir Kaur, Kanwardeep Kaur, R. Mohi
{"title":"RAPID ON-SITE EVALUATION AND MICRONUCLEUS SCORING IN BREAST LESIONS FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOPATHOLOGY BY NEW IAC YOKOHAMA SYSTEM OF REPORTING","authors":"Samriti Goyal, Mohanvir Kaur, Kanwardeep Kaur, R. Mohi","doi":"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i4.47786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the study is to report all fine needle aspiration cytopathology (FNAC) cases of lump breast as per New Yokohama classification 2016, to highlight the importance of rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) in breast cytology at the time of FNAC, and to assess the relationship between micronucleus (MN) scoring and various breast lesions in cytology.\nMethods: The study was conducted on 70 patients with breast lumps in the Department of Pathology in Government Medical College, Patiala, and comprised evaluation of ROSE and MN scoring in breast FNAC by the use of New Yokohama system of reporting.\nResults: On ROSE, 11 out of 70 patients were categorized under category I according to the Yokohama system of reporting and on the same sitting with repeat FNAC after performing the ROSE; nine cases were upgraded for cytological reporting and two remained in category I. According to as per the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system of reporting (2016) cases were categorized as category I – 2 (2.9%), category II – 46 (65.7%), category III – 7 (10.1%), category IV – 5 (7.1%), and category V – 10 (14.2%). In MN scoring, MN with the highest score of 14–17/1000 epithelial cells was in category V (malignant), and the lowest score was 0–1/1000 epithelial cells in category II (benign).\nConclusion: ROSE is an easy, safe, and cost-effective method. IAC Yokohama system for reporting (2016) provides a comprehensive way of categorizing various breast lesions on FNAC with clinical correlation. MN score is a good biomarker in differentiating benign, atypical, and malignant breast lesions.","PeriodicalId":8528,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i4.47786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study is to report all fine needle aspiration cytopathology (FNAC) cases of lump breast as per New Yokohama classification 2016, to highlight the importance of rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) in breast cytology at the time of FNAC, and to assess the relationship between micronucleus (MN) scoring and various breast lesions in cytology. Methods: The study was conducted on 70 patients with breast lumps in the Department of Pathology in Government Medical College, Patiala, and comprised evaluation of ROSE and MN scoring in breast FNAC by the use of New Yokohama system of reporting. Results: On ROSE, 11 out of 70 patients were categorized under category I according to the Yokohama system of reporting and on the same sitting with repeat FNAC after performing the ROSE; nine cases were upgraded for cytological reporting and two remained in category I. According to as per the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system of reporting (2016) cases were categorized as category I – 2 (2.9%), category II – 46 (65.7%), category III – 7 (10.1%), category IV – 5 (7.1%), and category V – 10 (14.2%). In MN scoring, MN with the highest score of 14–17/1000 epithelial cells was in category V (malignant), and the lowest score was 0–1/1000 epithelial cells in category II (benign). Conclusion: ROSE is an easy, safe, and cost-effective method. IAC Yokohama system for reporting (2016) provides a comprehensive way of categorizing various breast lesions on FNAC with clinical correlation. MN score is a good biomarker in differentiating benign, atypical, and malignant breast lesions.
采用新的 IAC 横滨报告系统对乳腺病变细针穿刺细胞病理学进行现场快速评估和微核评分
研究目的该研究的目的是根据2016年新横滨分类法报告所有乳腺肿块细针穿刺细胞病理学(FNAC)病例,强调FNAC时乳腺细胞学快速现场评估(ROSE)的重要性,并评估细胞学中微核(MN)评分与各种乳腺病变之间的关系:研究对象是帕蒂亚拉政府医学院病理学系的 70 名乳腺肿块患者,包括使用新横滨报告系统对乳腺 FNAC 的 ROSE 和 MN 评分进行评估:结果:根据横滨报告系统,70 名患者中有 11 名患者的 ROSE 被归类为 I 类,而在进行 ROSE 后重复 FNAC 的同一病例中,有 9 例被升级为细胞学报告,2 例仍为 I 类。根据国际细胞学学会(IAC)横滨报告系统(2016 年),病例被分为 I 类 - 2 例(2.9%)、II 类 - 46 例(65.7%)、III 类 - 7 例(10.1%)、IV 类 - 5 例(7.1%)和 V 类 - 10 例(14.2%)。在 MN 评分中,MN 最高分为 14-17/1000 个上皮细胞,属于 V 类(恶性),最低分为 0-1/1000 个上皮细胞,属于 II 类(良性):结论:ROSE 是一种简便、安全、经济的方法。IAC 横滨报告系统(2016 年)为 FNAC 上的各种乳腺病变提供了一种与临床相关的综合分类方法。MN 评分是区分良性、非典型和恶性乳腺病变的良好生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信