Two-year retest reliability and predictive validity of the Self- and Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 in older adults.

IF 3.3 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1037/pas0001316

Anton A Mays, Cameron J Mills, Joshua R. Oltmanns

{"title":"Two-year retest reliability and predictive validity of the Self- and Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 in older adults.","authors":"Anton A Mays, Cameron J Mills, Joshua R. Oltmanns","doi":"10.1037/pas0001316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The International Classification of Diseases, 11th edition (ICD-11) adopted a fully dimensional model of personality disorder. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) and Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (IPiC) were developed to assess the ICD-11 trait model, and the PiCD has since received significant validation support. However, there has only been one prior study of longitudinal predictive validity of the PiCD, two relatively short test-retest reliability studies of the PiCD, and no prior longitudinal tests of the IPiC. Longitudinal psychometric support for psychological assessment measures is essential. The present study provides a longer, larger, 2-year psychometric validation test of the PiCD and IPiC. Participants (N = 711) and their informants (N = 569) were recruited in the St. Louis Personality and Aging Network. The results demonstrated strong 2-year retest reliability for the PiCD and IPiC, as well as mean-level stability. Additionally, we explored the relationships between the PiCD and IPiC and important life outcome measures (depressive symptoms, satisfaction with life, and health status). The analysis revealed several significant associations between PiCD and IPiC scales and the outcome variables across time. Further, the PiCD Negative Affectivity and IPiC Detachment scales demonstrated incremental validity over each other and the outcome variables at Wave 1 in the prediction of depressive symptoms and satisfaction with life, respectively. The findings provide essential longitudinal test-retest reliability and predictive validity support for the PiCD and IPiC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The International Classification of Diseases, 11th edition (ICD-11) adopted a fully dimensional model of personality disorder. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) and Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (IPiC) were developed to assess the ICD-11 trait model, and the PiCD has since received significant validation support. However, there has only been one prior study of longitudinal predictive validity of the PiCD, two relatively short test-retest reliability studies of the PiCD, and no prior longitudinal tests of the IPiC. Longitudinal psychometric support for psychological assessment measures is essential. The present study provides a longer, larger, 2-year psychometric validation test of the PiCD and IPiC. Participants (N = 711) and their informants (N = 569) were recruited in the St. Louis Personality and Aging Network. The results demonstrated strong 2-year retest reliability for the PiCD and IPiC, as well as mean-level stability. Additionally, we explored the relationships between the PiCD and IPiC and important life outcome measures (depressive symptoms, satisfaction with life, and health status). The analysis revealed several significant associations between PiCD and IPiC scales and the outcome variables across time. Further, the PiCD Negative Affectivity and IPiC Detachment scales demonstrated incremental validity over each other and the outcome variables at Wave 1 in the prediction of depressive symptoms and satisfaction with life, respectively. The findings provide essential longitudinal test-retest reliability and predictive validity support for the PiCD and IPiC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文本刊更多论文

用于 ICD-11 的老年人自测和受测者个性量表的两年重测可靠性和预测有效性。

国际疾病分类》第 11 版（ICD-11）采用了人格障碍的全维度模型。为评估 ICD-11 特质模型，开发了 ICD-11 人格问卷（PiCD）和 ICD-11 问询者人格问卷（IPiC），PiCD 自此获得了大量验证支持。然而，此前仅有一项关于 PiCD 纵向预测有效性的研究、两项关于 PiCD 的相对较短的测试-再测试可靠性研究，以及一项关于 IPiC 的纵向测试。心理评估测量的纵向心理测量学支持至关重要。本研究对 PiCD 和 IPiC 进行了时间更长、规模更大、为期两年的心理测量验证测试。参与者（N = 711）及其信息提供者（N = 569）是在圣路易斯人格与老龄化网络中招募的。结果表明，PiCD 和 IPiC 的两年重测信度很高，平均水平也很稳定。此外，我们还探讨了 PiCD 和 IPiC 与重要生活结果测量（抑郁症状、生活满意度和健康状况）之间的关系。分析结果显示，在不同时期，PiCD 和 IPiC 量表与结果变量之间存在若干重要关联。此外，在预测抑郁症状和生活满意度方面，PiCD 消极情感量表和 IPiC 疏离感量表在第 1 波时分别显示出相互之间和与结果变量之间的递增有效性。研究结果为 PiCD 和 IPiC 提供了重要的纵向重复测试可靠性和预测有效性支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

5.60%

发文量

167

期刊介绍： Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews