Irish autonomous verbs in a semantic-pragmatic interface: Some reflections on information structure-driven valency reduction

Viviana Masia
{"title":"Irish autonomous verbs in a semantic-pragmatic interface: Some reflections on information structure-driven valency reduction","authors":"Viviana Masia","doi":"10.13092/lo.127.11089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous verbs in Irish are special verb forms incompatible with the surface realization of a subject. Previous studies have suggested to postulate empty categories such as pro, PRO or expletive pro to fill the subject position (cf. Stenson 1989; McCloskey 2007; Bondaruk/ Charzyńska-Wóicjk 2003), thus rejecting the idea that these verbs might be classified as completely subjectless. A series of syntactic tests bear out the hypothesis that, at least for Irish, these verbs behave as actually lacking a subject. I first suggest correlating this state of affairs to the fact that, with autonomous verbs, no argument role to be promoted to subject position is selected at the valency level, although it is “implied” in the unfolding of the event. Secondly, I argue that both valency reduction and syntactic non-realization of an argument role is driven by information structural constraints; notably, the focal nature of autonomous verbs (as advocated elsewhere, cf. Nolan 2012) causes the subject (together with the argument role it is associated with) to be informationally downgraded, thereby leading to its suppression in the sentence. The position held in this paper is that autonomous verbs of the Irish type epitomize an interesting phenomenon of semantic-pragmatic interface, with the pragmatic level of the utterance “mediating” between the semantic and the syntactic level; in such a perspective, the pragmatic (information structural) level of an utterance would determine either the number and type of argument roles a verb can take in a particular discourse context (cf. DuBois 1987; Goldberg 2006) and their syntactic encoding.","PeriodicalId":56243,"journal":{"name":"Linguistik Online","volume":"57 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistik Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.127.11089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomous verbs in Irish are special verb forms incompatible with the surface realization of a subject. Previous studies have suggested to postulate empty categories such as pro, PRO or expletive pro to fill the subject position (cf. Stenson 1989; McCloskey 2007; Bondaruk/ Charzyńska-Wóicjk 2003), thus rejecting the idea that these verbs might be classified as completely subjectless. A series of syntactic tests bear out the hypothesis that, at least for Irish, these verbs behave as actually lacking a subject. I first suggest correlating this state of affairs to the fact that, with autonomous verbs, no argument role to be promoted to subject position is selected at the valency level, although it is “implied” in the unfolding of the event. Secondly, I argue that both valency reduction and syntactic non-realization of an argument role is driven by information structural constraints; notably, the focal nature of autonomous verbs (as advocated elsewhere, cf. Nolan 2012) causes the subject (together with the argument role it is associated with) to be informationally downgraded, thereby leading to its suppression in the sentence. The position held in this paper is that autonomous verbs of the Irish type epitomize an interesting phenomenon of semantic-pragmatic interface, with the pragmatic level of the utterance “mediating” between the semantic and the syntactic level; in such a perspective, the pragmatic (information structural) level of an utterance would determine either the number and type of argument roles a verb can take in a particular discourse context (cf. DuBois 1987; Goldberg 2006) and their syntactic encoding.
语义-语用界面中的爱尔兰自主动词:对信息结构驱动的价位降低的一些思考
爱尔兰语中的自主动词是与主语的表面实现不相容的特殊动词形式。以往的研究建议假设空范畴,如 pro、PRO 或 expletive pro 来填补主语位置(参见 Stenson 1989;McCloskey 2007;Bondaruk/ Charzyńska-Wóicjk 2003),从而否定了这些动词可以被归类为完全无主语的观点。一系列句法测试证实了这一假设,即至少对爱尔兰语来说,这些动词的行为实际上是缺乏主语的。首先,我建议将这种情况与以下事实联系起来:对于自主动词,虽然在事件的展开过程中 "隐含 "了要提升到主语位置的论据角色,但在价位层面上并没有选择这种角色。其次,我认为论据角色的价位降低和句法不实现都是由信息结构限制驱动的;尤其是自主动词的焦点性质(如其他地方所主张的,参见 Nolan 2012)导致主语(连同与其相关的论据角色)在信息上降级,从而导致其在句子中被压制。本文所持的立场是,爱尔兰类型的自主动词体现了一种有趣的语义-语用界面现象,语篇的语用层面在语义和句法层面之间 "起着中介作用";从这个角度看,语篇的语用(信息结构)层面将决定动词在特定话语语境中可以扮演的论点角色的数量和类型(参见 DuBois 1987;Goldberg 2006)以及它们的句法编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信