Effect of Evidence-Based Guidelines Regarding Port-A-Cath Care on Oncology Nurses’ Performance and Patients’ Health Outcomes

Zeinab M.Galal, Hanan G.Mohamed, Samah E .Ghonem, Safaa .M. El-Sayed
{"title":"Effect of Evidence-Based Guidelines Regarding Port-A-Cath Care on Oncology Nurses’ Performance and Patients’ Health Outcomes","authors":"Zeinab M.Galal, Hanan G.Mohamed, Samah E .Ghonem, Safaa .M. El-Sayed","doi":"10.21608/bjas.2024.279823.1375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implantable Port-A-Catheter is a central vascular access device that provides direct access to large blood vessels. The device has become an integral part of daily oncology nursing clinical care, improving nurses' knowledge and practice is crucial for compliance minimizing complications, and improving patient outcomes. Aim: It was to evaluate the effect of evidence-based guidelines regarding port-a-Cath care on oncology nurses’ performance and patients’ health outcomes. Design: A quasi-experimental design was used. Setting: medical oncology and nuclear medicine unit and inpatient unit at Benha University Hospital, Egypt. Sample: A convenient sample of (67) Oncology nurses and a purposive sample of 134 patients who connected to port-a-cath., they were classified into two groups; group A was assessed pre-evidence-based nursing guidelines intervention; and group B was evaluated post-evidence-based nursing guidelines intervention. Both groups of patients had been cared for by the same group of studied nurses, concerning the port-a-catheter procedure. Tools for data collection: A structured Questionnaire, nurse’s practice observational Checklist, Patient assessment, and clinical health outcomes data assessment. Results: There were statistically significant differences between pre & post-EBNGI regarding the knowledge and practice of the studied nurses regarding care for the patient with port-A-catheter. Patients ( Group B) who had been cared for by the same group of studied nurses post-EBNGI had l fewer complications as compared with patients (Group A) who had been cared for by the same group of studied nurses pre-EBNGI, but this decrease was not statistically significant difference in relation to their health outcomes . Conclusions: The evidence-based nursing guidelines intervention were helpful in the improvement of the nurses' knowledge and practices for the prevention of port-A-catheter-related complications among oncology patients. Recommendations: Periodic educational programs regarding port-a-catheter care for nurses who provide care for patients connected to port-a-cath.","PeriodicalId":8745,"journal":{"name":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","volume":"95 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2024.279823.1375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implantable Port-A-Catheter is a central vascular access device that provides direct access to large blood vessels. The device has become an integral part of daily oncology nursing clinical care, improving nurses' knowledge and practice is crucial for compliance minimizing complications, and improving patient outcomes. Aim: It was to evaluate the effect of evidence-based guidelines regarding port-a-Cath care on oncology nurses’ performance and patients’ health outcomes. Design: A quasi-experimental design was used. Setting: medical oncology and nuclear medicine unit and inpatient unit at Benha University Hospital, Egypt. Sample: A convenient sample of (67) Oncology nurses and a purposive sample of 134 patients who connected to port-a-cath., they were classified into two groups; group A was assessed pre-evidence-based nursing guidelines intervention; and group B was evaluated post-evidence-based nursing guidelines intervention. Both groups of patients had been cared for by the same group of studied nurses, concerning the port-a-catheter procedure. Tools for data collection: A structured Questionnaire, nurse’s practice observational Checklist, Patient assessment, and clinical health outcomes data assessment. Results: There were statistically significant differences between pre & post-EBNGI regarding the knowledge and practice of the studied nurses regarding care for the patient with port-A-catheter. Patients ( Group B) who had been cared for by the same group of studied nurses post-EBNGI had l fewer complications as compared with patients (Group A) who had been cared for by the same group of studied nurses pre-EBNGI, but this decrease was not statistically significant difference in relation to their health outcomes . Conclusions: The evidence-based nursing guidelines intervention were helpful in the improvement of the nurses' knowledge and practices for the prevention of port-A-catheter-related complications among oncology patients. Recommendations: Periodic educational programs regarding port-a-catheter care for nurses who provide care for patients connected to port-a-cath.
以证据为基础的导管口护理指南对肿瘤科护士工作表现和患者健康结果的影响
植入式导管是一种可直接进入大血管的中心血管通路装置。该设备已成为肿瘤科日常临床护理中不可或缺的一部分,提高护士的知识和实践水平对于遵从医嘱、减少并发症和改善患者预后至关重要。目的:评估以证据为基础的导管口护理指南对肿瘤科护士工作表现和患者健康结果的影响。设计:采用准实验设计。地点:埃及本哈大学医院肿瘤内科、核医学科和住院部。样本:方便取样的肿瘤科护士(67 名)和有目的取样的 134 名接受过插管治疗的患者,将他们分为两组:A 组在基于证据的护理指南干预前进行评估;B 组在基于证据的护理指南干预后进行评估。两组患者均由同一组接受研究的护士进行导管插入术护理。数据收集工具:结构化问卷、护士实践观察核对表、患者评估和临床健康结果数据评估。结果在 EBNGI 前后,接受研究的护士对使用导管插口的患者的护理知识和实践有明显的统计学差异。与 EBNGI 前由同组护士护理的患者(A 组)相比,在 EBNGI 后由同组护士护理的患者(B 组)并发症较少,但并发症的减少与患者的健康结果没有明显统计学差异。结论循证护理指南干预有助于提高护士在预防肿瘤患者 A 型导尿管相关并发症方面的知识和实践水平。建议:针对为连接导管的患者提供护理服务的护士定期开展有关导管护理的教育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信