Flexion contracture can cause component mismatch in the Prophecy® preoperative patient-specific instrumentation for Evolution® medial-pivot knee system

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
SICOT-J Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2024009
Shuhei Hiyama, Tsuneari Takahashi, Mikiko Handa, Katsushi Takeshita
{"title":"Flexion contracture can cause component mismatch in the Prophecy® preoperative patient-specific instrumentation for Evolution® medial-pivot knee system","authors":"Shuhei Hiyama, Tsuneari Takahashi, Mikiko Handa, Katsushi Takeshita","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems are used to conduct total knee arthroplasty. PSI reduces operative time, is less invasive and easier to use, and minimizes the risk of errors by providing precise measurements and reducing operating room turnover time. However, a study on the accuracy of Prophecy Evolution PSI (Microport Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) reported that 94% were below the error margin of 1.5 mm and 90% had error margins of 1 mm. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Prophecy Evolution PSI system in terms of the thickness of “total” bony resection required to achieve adequate extension/flexion gaps and the component match ratio between preoperative planning and actual component size inserted. Methods: Comparisons were made between the sizes of femoral and tibial components planned with PSI and those inserted. The primary outcome was the average preoperative range of motion with and without matched femoral/tibial components. The study further analyzed the proportions of cases in which both the femoral and tibial components matched, neither matched, and only one of the femoral or tibial components matched. Results: The ratio of the same sizes between the PSI planning and those inserted was 50.8% (33 patients) for both the femoral and tibial components. For the femoral component alone, the ratio was 84.6% (55 patients), and for the tibial component, it was 58.4% (38 patients). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that flexion contracture greater than 20° was a significant prognostic factor for the PSI component match group versus the mismatch group. Discussion: Flexion contracture may cause PSI mismatch. Notably, flexion contracture greater than 20° was a significant risk factor for the PSI component match group versus the mismatch group. During preoperative planning for a patient with flexion contracture, surgeons should prepare for the possibility of inserting an undersized tibial component.","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems are used to conduct total knee arthroplasty. PSI reduces operative time, is less invasive and easier to use, and minimizes the risk of errors by providing precise measurements and reducing operating room turnover time. However, a study on the accuracy of Prophecy Evolution PSI (Microport Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) reported that 94% were below the error margin of 1.5 mm and 90% had error margins of 1 mm. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Prophecy Evolution PSI system in terms of the thickness of “total” bony resection required to achieve adequate extension/flexion gaps and the component match ratio between preoperative planning and actual component size inserted. Methods: Comparisons were made between the sizes of femoral and tibial components planned with PSI and those inserted. The primary outcome was the average preoperative range of motion with and without matched femoral/tibial components. The study further analyzed the proportions of cases in which both the femoral and tibial components matched, neither matched, and only one of the femoral or tibial components matched. Results: The ratio of the same sizes between the PSI planning and those inserted was 50.8% (33 patients) for both the femoral and tibial components. For the femoral component alone, the ratio was 84.6% (55 patients), and for the tibial component, it was 58.4% (38 patients). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that flexion contracture greater than 20° was a significant prognostic factor for the PSI component match group versus the mismatch group. Discussion: Flexion contracture may cause PSI mismatch. Notably, flexion contracture greater than 20° was a significant risk factor for the PSI component match group versus the mismatch group. During preoperative planning for a patient with flexion contracture, surgeons should prepare for the possibility of inserting an undersized tibial component.
屈曲挛缩会导致用于 Evolution® 膝关节内侧支点系统的 Prophecy® 术前患者专用器械的组件不匹配
导言:患者专用器械(PSI)系统用于进行全膝关节置换术。PSI 可缩短手术时间,创伤更小,使用更方便,并通过提供精确测量和减少手术室周转时间最大限度地降低出错风险。然而,一项关于 Prophecy Evolution PSI(Microport Inc.,美国田纳西州阿灵顿市)准确性的研究报告显示,94% 的误差在 1.5 毫米以下,90% 的误差在 1 毫米以下。本研究旨在评估 Prophecy Evolution PSI 系统的准确性,即达到足够伸展/屈曲间隙所需的 "全部 "骨质切除厚度,以及术前规划和实际插入的组件尺寸之间的组件匹配率。方法:比较使用 PSI 计划植入的股骨和胫骨组件尺寸与实际植入的组件尺寸。主要结果是使用和未使用匹配股骨/胫骨组件时的术前平均活动范围。研究还进一步分析了股骨和胫骨组件均匹配、两者均不匹配以及只有一个股骨或胫骨组件匹配的病例比例。结果显示股骨和胫骨组件的 PSI 规划尺寸与插入尺寸相同的比例为 50.8%(33 名患者)。仅就股骨组件而言,这一比例为 84.6%(55 名患者),而就胫骨组件而言,这一比例为 58.4%(38 名患者)。接受者操作特征曲线分析表明,屈曲挛缩大于20°是PSI组件匹配组相对于不匹配组的一个重要预后因素。讨论:屈曲挛缩可能导致 PSI 不匹配。值得注意的是,屈曲挛缩大于20°是PSI组件匹配组相对于不匹配组的一个重要风险因素。在为屈曲挛缩患者制定术前计划时,外科医生应为插入尺寸过小的胫骨组件的可能性做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信