Computational Decision Support for PE Diagnosis based on Ventilation Perfusion Ratio.

Julia Katharina Vogt, Wolfgang Kurt Vogt, Alexander Heinzel, F. Mottaghy
{"title":"Computational Decision Support for PE Diagnosis based on Ventilation Perfusion Ratio.","authors":"Julia Katharina Vogt, Wolfgang Kurt Vogt, Alexander Heinzel, F. Mottaghy","doi":"10.1055/a-2287-2051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nThe aim of this study is to investigate whether computer-aided, semi-automated 3D lung lobe quantification can support decision-making on PE diagnosis based on the ventilation-perfusion ratio in clinical practice.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA study cohort of 100 patients (39 male, 61 female, age 64.8±15.8 years) underwent ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT/CT) to exclude acute PE on SPECT/CT OPTIMA NM/CT 640 (GE Healthcare). Two 3D lung lobe quantification software tools (Q. Lung: Xeleris 4.0, GE Healthcare and LLQ: Hermes Hybrid 3D Lung Lobar Quantification, Hermes Medical Solutions) were used to evaluate the numerical lobar ventilation/perfusion ratio (VQR) and lobar volume/perfusion ratio (VPR). A test of linearity and equivalence of the two 3D software tools was performed using Pearson, Spearman, quadratic weighted kappa and the mean squared deviation for VPR/VQR. An algorithm was developed that identified PE candidates using ROC analysis. The agreement between the PE findings of an experienced nuclear medicine expert and the calculated PE candidates was represented by the magnitude of the YOUDEN index (J) and the size of the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).\n\n\nRESULTS\nBoth 3D software tools showed good comparability. The YOUDEN index for QLUNG(VPR/VQR)/LLQ(VPR/VQR) was in the range from 0.2 to 0.5. The mean AUC averaged over all lung lobes for QLUNG(VPR) was 0.66, CI95%: ±14.0%, for QLUNG(VQR) 0.66, CI95%: ±13.3%, for LLQ(VPR) 0.64, CI95%: ±14.7% and for LLQ(VQR) 0.65, CI95%: ±13.1%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis study reveals that 3D software tools are feasible for numerical PE detection. The clinical decision can be supported by using a numerical algorithm based on ROC analysis.","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2287-2051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM The aim of this study is to investigate whether computer-aided, semi-automated 3D lung lobe quantification can support decision-making on PE diagnosis based on the ventilation-perfusion ratio in clinical practice. METHODS A study cohort of 100 patients (39 male, 61 female, age 64.8±15.8 years) underwent ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT/CT) to exclude acute PE on SPECT/CT OPTIMA NM/CT 640 (GE Healthcare). Two 3D lung lobe quantification software tools (Q. Lung: Xeleris 4.0, GE Healthcare and LLQ: Hermes Hybrid 3D Lung Lobar Quantification, Hermes Medical Solutions) were used to evaluate the numerical lobar ventilation/perfusion ratio (VQR) and lobar volume/perfusion ratio (VPR). A test of linearity and equivalence of the two 3D software tools was performed using Pearson, Spearman, quadratic weighted kappa and the mean squared deviation for VPR/VQR. An algorithm was developed that identified PE candidates using ROC analysis. The agreement between the PE findings of an experienced nuclear medicine expert and the calculated PE candidates was represented by the magnitude of the YOUDEN index (J) and the size of the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS Both 3D software tools showed good comparability. The YOUDEN index for QLUNG(VPR/VQR)/LLQ(VPR/VQR) was in the range from 0.2 to 0.5. The mean AUC averaged over all lung lobes for QLUNG(VPR) was 0.66, CI95%: ±14.0%, for QLUNG(VQR) 0.66, CI95%: ±13.3%, for LLQ(VPR) 0.64, CI95%: ±14.7% and for LLQ(VQR) 0.65, CI95%: ±13.1%. CONCLUSION This study reveals that 3D software tools are feasible for numerical PE detection. The clinical decision can be supported by using a numerical algorithm based on ROC analysis.
基于通气灌注比的 PE 诊断计算决策支持。
方法研究队列中的 100 名患者(39 名男性,61 名女性,年龄为 64.8±15.8 岁)接受了通气/灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(V/Q-SPECT/CT),以排除 SPECT/CT OPTIMA NM/CT 640(通用电气医疗集团)的急性 PE。两个三维肺叶量化软件工具(Q. Lung:Xeleris 4.0,GE Healthcare)和LLQ:Hermes Hybrid 3D Lung Lobar Quantification,Hermes Medical Solutions)用于评估数值肺叶通气/灌注比(VQR)和肺叶容积/灌注比(VPR)。使用皮尔逊、斯皮尔曼、二次加权卡帕和 VPR/VQR 的均方差对两种 3D 软件工具的线性和等效性进行了测试。还开发了一种算法,利用 ROC 分析确定 PE 候选者。经验丰富的核医学专家得出的 PE 结果与计算出的 PE 候选结果之间的一致性用尤登指数(J)的大小和接收者操作曲线下面积(AUC)的大小来表示。QLUNG(VPR/VQR)/LLQ(VPR/VQR)的尤登指数在 0.2 至 0.5 之间。QLUNG(VPR)的所有肺叶平均AUC为0.66,CI95%:±14.0%;QLUNG(VQR)为0.66,CI95%:±13.3%;LLQ(VPR)为0.64,CI95%:±14.7%;LLQ(VQR)为0.65,CI95%:±13.1%。通过使用基于 ROC 分析的数值算法,可为临床决策提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信