REVISITING THE ISSUE OF CONNECTIONS AMONG THE NOMADS SOCIAL ELITE FROM THE SOUTHERN URALS ACCORDING TO CRANIOLOGY DATA FROM THE FILIPPOVKA KURGANS

A. Khokhlov, E. Kitov, Vladimir Myshkin
{"title":"REVISITING THE ISSUE OF CONNECTIONS AMONG THE NOMADS SOCIAL ELITE FROM THE SOUTHERN URALS ACCORDING TO CRANIOLOGY DATA FROM THE FILIPPOVKA KURGANS","authors":"A. Khokhlov, E. Kitov, Vladimir Myshkin","doi":"10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2024.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the reconstruction of the relations of the nomads‘ social elite from the Southern Urals buried in the cemetries of the kurgans Filippovka 1, 2. The total craniological series of these monuments consists of 22 skulls (9 male and 13 female) representing brachycranial broad-faced Caucasoids. The aim of the study is to determine the historical roots of this group including their migration patterns, as well as their contacts with the surrounding population. The study is based on a comparative analysis of 35 craniological series of the Early Iron Age sites in the steppe and forest-steppe zones of Eurasia. The comparison was carried out according to the canonical analysis method using the Multican and Statistica 12 programs. In terms of morphological features, the individuals buried in the Filippovka kurgans are as close as possible to the nomads of the Southern Urals and the Lower Volga region of the Sauromatian (6th – 5th/4th centuries BC) and early Sarmatian (4th – 3rd centuries BC) time. They probably come from the local nomadic population who resided in this territory in early Sauromatian time. Representatives of the Filippovka group are also morphologically close to the Saka of the Aral Sea region and to the bearers of the Tasmolà culture from Central Kazakhstan. The formation of the pastoral population of the Early Iron Age (5th – 4th centuries BC) of two regions – the Southern Urals and the Aral Sea – might have taken place on a single anthropological basis, which is associated with the nomadic tribes of Central Kazakhstan including the bearers of the Tasmolà culture who had contacts with the Southern Siberia settled groups. As a result of mestizo processes on the contact territory, a special type of population the so-called Eastern Caucasoids with a small Mongoloid admixture was formed, which then spread in the southern Aral and western Ural directions. The spatial connections of the population that left the Filippovka kurgans are geographically wide. Judging by the archaeological data, they were grounded primarily on the basis of trade and economic relations. The craniological source shows some heterogeneity of the Ural nomads, but it is difficult to speak confidently about the time and mixing forms of their constituent components; the recorded phenomenon is also relevant among other synchronous groups of mobile pastoralists from Central Asia.","PeriodicalId":512047,"journal":{"name":"Nizhnevolzhskiy Arheologicheskiy Vestnik","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nizhnevolzhskiy Arheologicheskiy Vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2024.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the reconstruction of the relations of the nomads‘ social elite from the Southern Urals buried in the cemetries of the kurgans Filippovka 1, 2. The total craniological series of these monuments consists of 22 skulls (9 male and 13 female) representing brachycranial broad-faced Caucasoids. The aim of the study is to determine the historical roots of this group including their migration patterns, as well as their contacts with the surrounding population. The study is based on a comparative analysis of 35 craniological series of the Early Iron Age sites in the steppe and forest-steppe zones of Eurasia. The comparison was carried out according to the canonical analysis method using the Multican and Statistica 12 programs. In terms of morphological features, the individuals buried in the Filippovka kurgans are as close as possible to the nomads of the Southern Urals and the Lower Volga region of the Sauromatian (6th – 5th/4th centuries BC) and early Sarmatian (4th – 3rd centuries BC) time. They probably come from the local nomadic population who resided in this territory in early Sauromatian time. Representatives of the Filippovka group are also morphologically close to the Saka of the Aral Sea region and to the bearers of the Tasmolà culture from Central Kazakhstan. The formation of the pastoral population of the Early Iron Age (5th – 4th centuries BC) of two regions – the Southern Urals and the Aral Sea – might have taken place on a single anthropological basis, which is associated with the nomadic tribes of Central Kazakhstan including the bearers of the Tasmolà culture who had contacts with the Southern Siberia settled groups. As a result of mestizo processes on the contact territory, a special type of population the so-called Eastern Caucasoids with a small Mongoloid admixture was formed, which then spread in the southern Aral and western Ural directions. The spatial connections of the population that left the Filippovka kurgans are geographically wide. Judging by the archaeological data, they were grounded primarily on the basis of trade and economic relations. The craniological source shows some heterogeneity of the Ural nomads, but it is difficult to speak confidently about the time and mixing forms of their constituent components; the recorded phenomenon is also relevant among other synchronous groups of mobile pastoralists from Central Asia.
根据菲利波夫卡城堡的颅骨学数据重新审视南乌拉尔游牧民族社会精英之间的联系问题
文章致力于重建埋葬在菲利波夫卡 1 号和 2 号城堡墓地中的南乌拉尔游牧民族社会精英的关系。这些古迹的头骨系列共有 22 个头骨(9 个男性头骨和 13 个女性头骨),代表了颅骨宽面高加索人。研究的目的是确定这一群体的历史根源,包括他们的迁徙模式,以及他们与周围人群的接触情况。该研究基于对欧亚大陆草原和森林草原地区早期铁器时代遗址的 35 个颅骨系列的比较分析。比较是通过使用 Multican 和 Statistica 12 程序的典型分析方法进行的。就形态特征而言,埋葬在菲利波夫卡(Filippovka)城堡中的人尽可能地接近于索罗马特(公元前 6-5/4 世纪)和萨尔马特早期(公元前 4-3 世纪)乌拉尔南部和伏尔加河下游地区的游牧民族。他们可能是早在绍罗马蒂亚时代就居住在这一地区的当地游牧民族。菲利波夫卡族群的代表在形态上也接近咸海地区的萨卡人和中哈萨克斯坦的塔斯莫拉文化传承人。南乌拉尔和咸海这两个地区铁器时代早期(公元前 5-4 世纪)游牧民族的形成可能是在单一的人类学基础上进行的,这与中哈萨克斯坦的游牧部落有关,其中包括与南西伯利亚定居群体有联系的塔斯莫拉文化的传承者。由于接触地区的混血过程,形成了一种特殊的人口类型,即所谓的东高加索人,其中有少量蒙古人混血,然后向咸海南部和乌拉尔西部扩散。离开菲利波夫卡城堡的人口在地理上的空间联系非常广泛。从考古数据来看,这些联系主要建立在贸易和经济关系的基础上。颅骨学资料显示乌拉尔游牧民族具有一定的异质性,但很难确定其组成成分的时间和混合形式;所记录的现象也与中亚其他同步的流动牧民群体有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书