The Effect of Coordinating the Outpatient Treatment across Medical Specialities for Patients With Multimorbidity

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Cathrine Bell, C. W. Appel, Anders Prior, Anne Frølich, A. Pedersen, P. Vedsted
{"title":"The Effect of Coordinating the Outpatient Treatment across Medical Specialities for Patients With Multimorbidity","authors":"Cathrine Bell, C. W. Appel, Anders Prior, Anne Frølich, A. Pedersen, P. Vedsted","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patients with multimorbidity attend multiple outpatient clinics. We assessed the effects on hospital use of scheduling several outpatient appointments to same-day visits in a multidisciplinary outpatient pathway (MOP). Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental design. Eligible patients had multimorbidity, were aged ≥18 years and attended ≥2 outpatient clinics in five different specialties. Patients were identified through forthcoming appointments from August 2018 to March 2020 and divided into intervention group (alignment of appointments) and comparison group (no alignment). We used patient questionnaires and paired analyses to study care integration and treatment burden. Using negative binomial regression, we estimated healthcare utilisation as incidence rates ratios (IRRs) at one year before and one year after baseline for both groups and compared IRR ratios (IRRRs). Results: Intervention patients had a 19% reduction in hospital visits (IRRR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70–0.96) and a 17% reduction in blood samples (IRRR: 0.83, 0.73–0.96) compared to comparison patients. No effects were found for care integration, treatment burden, outpatient contacts, terminated outpatient trajectories, hospital admissions, days of admission or GP contacts. Conclusion: The MOP seemed to reduce the number of hospital visits and blood samples. These results should be further investigated in studies exploring the coordination of outpatient care for multimorbidity. Research question: Can an intervention of coordinating outpatient appointments to same-day visits combined with a multidisciplinary conference influence the utilisation of healthcare services and the patient-assessed integration of healthcare services and treatment burden among patients with multimorbidity?","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with multimorbidity attend multiple outpatient clinics. We assessed the effects on hospital use of scheduling several outpatient appointments to same-day visits in a multidisciplinary outpatient pathway (MOP). Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental design. Eligible patients had multimorbidity, were aged ≥18 years and attended ≥2 outpatient clinics in five different specialties. Patients were identified through forthcoming appointments from August 2018 to March 2020 and divided into intervention group (alignment of appointments) and comparison group (no alignment). We used patient questionnaires and paired analyses to study care integration and treatment burden. Using negative binomial regression, we estimated healthcare utilisation as incidence rates ratios (IRRs) at one year before and one year after baseline for both groups and compared IRR ratios (IRRRs). Results: Intervention patients had a 19% reduction in hospital visits (IRRR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70–0.96) and a 17% reduction in blood samples (IRRR: 0.83, 0.73–0.96) compared to comparison patients. No effects were found for care integration, treatment burden, outpatient contacts, terminated outpatient trajectories, hospital admissions, days of admission or GP contacts. Conclusion: The MOP seemed to reduce the number of hospital visits and blood samples. These results should be further investigated in studies exploring the coordination of outpatient care for multimorbidity. Research question: Can an intervention of coordinating outpatient appointments to same-day visits combined with a multidisciplinary conference influence the utilisation of healthcare services and the patient-assessed integration of healthcare services and treatment burden among patients with multimorbidity?
跨专科协调门诊治疗对多病症患者的影响
简介身患多种疾病的患者需要在多个门诊就诊。我们评估了在多学科门诊路径(MOP)中将多个门诊预约安排在同一天就诊对医院使用率的影响。方法:本研究采用准实验设计。符合条件的患者患有多种疾病,年龄≥18 岁,在五个不同专科的门诊就诊≥2 次。患者通过 2018 年 8 月至 2020 年 3 月期间即将进行的预约确定,并分为干预组(调整预约)和对比组(不调整)。我们使用患者问卷和配对分析来研究护理整合和治疗负担。通过负二项回归,我们估算了两组基线前一年和基线后一年的医疗利用率(IRR),并比较了IRR比率(IRRs)。结果显示与对比组患者相比,干预组患者的医院就诊次数减少了 19%(IRR:0.81,95% CI:0.70-0.96),血液样本减少了 17%(IRR:0.83,0.73-0.96)。在护理整合、治疗负担、门诊接触、终止门诊轨迹、入院、入院天数或全科医生接触方面均未发现效果。结论澳门葡京娱乐网址似乎减少了医院就诊和血液样本的数量。这些结果应在探索多病门诊护理协调的研究中进一步探讨。研究问题将门诊预约协调为当天就诊并结合多学科会议的干预措施能否影响多病症患者对医疗服务的利用率以及患者评估的医疗服务整合度和治疗负担?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信