Diagnostic Accuracy of Computerized Bowel Sound Analysis with Non-Invasive Devices for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Q2 Medicine
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Computerized Bowel Sound Analysis with Non-Invasive Devices for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.24920/004307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases until September 2023. Cross-sectional and case-control studies on diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for IBS were identified. We estimated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (<em>CI</em>), and plotted a summary receiver operating characteristic curve and evaluated the area under the curve.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four studies were included. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.94 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.87–0.97), 0.89 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.81–0.94), 8.43 (95% <em>CI</em>, 4.81–14.78), 0.07 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.03–0.15), and 118.86 (95% <em>CI</em>, 44.18–319.75), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.95–0.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Computerized bowel sound analysis is a promising tool for IBS. However, limited high-quality data make the results' validity and applicability questionable. There is a need for more diagnostic test accuracy studies and better wearable devices for monitoring and analysis of IBS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35615,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","volume":"39 2","pages":"Pages 122-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001929424000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases until September 2023. Cross-sectional and case-control studies on diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for IBS were identified. We estimated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and plotted a summary receiver operating characteristic curve and evaluated the area under the curve.

Results

Four studies were included. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81–0.94), 8.43 (95% CI, 4.81–14.78), 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03–0.15), and 118.86 (95% CI, 44.18–319.75), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95–0.98).

Conclusions

Computerized bowel sound analysis is a promising tool for IBS. However, limited high-quality data make the results' validity and applicability questionable. There is a need for more diagnostic test accuracy studies and better wearable devices for monitoring and analysis of IBS.

计算机肠鸣音分析与非侵入性设备对肠易激综合征的诊断准确性:系统回顾与元分析》。
目的 通过系统综述和荟萃分析评估肠易激综合征(IBS)肠鸣音分析的诊断准确性。方法 我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 IEEE Xplore 数据库,直至 2023 年 9 月。确定了肠鸣音分析对肠易激综合征诊断准确性的横断面研究和病例对照研究。我们估算了汇总的灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断几率比(含 95% 置信区间 (CI)),绘制了接收者操作特征曲线并评估了曲线下面积。结果 共纳入四项研究。汇总的诊断灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断几率比分别为 0.94(95% CI,0.87-0.97)、0.89(95% CI,0.81-0.94)、8.43(95% CI,4.81-14.78)、0.07(95% CI,0.03-0.15)和 118.86(95% CI,44.18-319.75),曲线下面积为 0.97(95% CI,0.95-0.98)。结论 计算机肠鸣音分析是一种治疗肠易激综合征的有效工具。然而,由于高质量数据有限,其结果的有效性和适用性值得怀疑。需要进行更多的诊断测试准确性研究和更好的可穿戴设备来进行监测和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1275
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信