Unveiling the truth: A systematic review of fact-checking and fake news research in social sciences

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION
S. Tejedor, Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez, Mónica Gracia-Villar
{"title":"Unveiling the truth: A systematic review of fact-checking and fake news research in social sciences","authors":"S. Tejedor, Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez, Mónica Gracia-Villar","doi":"10.30935/ojcmt/14455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current media ecosystem, marked by immediacy and social networks dynamics, has created a fertile field for disinformation. Faced with its exponential growth, since 2014, research has focused on combating false content in the media. From a descriptive approach, this study has analyzed 200 documents on fact-checking and fake news published between 2014 and 2022 in scientific journals indexed in Scopus. This study has found that Europe and the United States are leading the way in the number of journals and authors publishing on the subject. The United States universities are the ones that host the most significant number of authors working on fact-checking, while the methodologies used, mostly ad hoc due to the novelty of the topic, allow to reflect on the need to promote work focused on the design, testing, and evaluation of prototypes or real experiences within the field. The most common contributions analyzed include typologies of false content and media manipulation mechanisms, models for evaluating and detecting disinformation, proposals to combat false content and strengthen verification mechanisms, studies on the role of social media in the spread of disinformation, efforts to develop media literacy among the public and journalists, case studies of fact-checkers, identification of factors that influence the belief in fake news, and analysis of the relationship between disinformation, verification, politics, and democracy. It is concluded that it is essential to develop research that connects the academy with the industry to raise awareness of the need to address these issues among the different actors in the media scenario.","PeriodicalId":42941,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current media ecosystem, marked by immediacy and social networks dynamics, has created a fertile field for disinformation. Faced with its exponential growth, since 2014, research has focused on combating false content in the media. From a descriptive approach, this study has analyzed 200 documents on fact-checking and fake news published between 2014 and 2022 in scientific journals indexed in Scopus. This study has found that Europe and the United States are leading the way in the number of journals and authors publishing on the subject. The United States universities are the ones that host the most significant number of authors working on fact-checking, while the methodologies used, mostly ad hoc due to the novelty of the topic, allow to reflect on the need to promote work focused on the design, testing, and evaluation of prototypes or real experiences within the field. The most common contributions analyzed include typologies of false content and media manipulation mechanisms, models for evaluating and detecting disinformation, proposals to combat false content and strengthen verification mechanisms, studies on the role of social media in the spread of disinformation, efforts to develop media literacy among the public and journalists, case studies of fact-checkers, identification of factors that influence the belief in fake news, and analysis of the relationship between disinformation, verification, politics, and democracy. It is concluded that it is essential to develop research that connects the academy with the industry to raise awareness of the need to address these issues among the different actors in the media scenario.
揭开真相:对社会科学中事实核查和假新闻研究的系统回顾
当前的媒体生态系统以即时性和社交网络动态为特点,为虚假信息提供了肥沃的土壤。面对虚假信息的指数式增长,自 2014 年以来,有关打击媒体中虚假内容的研究一直备受关注。本研究采用描述性方法,分析了斯科普斯(Scopus)收录的科学期刊在 2014 年至 2022 年间发表的 200 篇有关事实核查和假新闻的文献。研究发现,欧洲和美国在发表相关论文的期刊和作者数量上遥遥领先。美国的大学是从事事实核查工作的作者数量最多的大学,而所使用的方法由于该主题的新颖性而大多是临时性的,这使我们能够反思是否有必要促进侧重于设计、测试和评估原型或该领域实际经验的工作。所分析的最常见的贡献包括:虚假内容和媒体操纵机制的类型学、评估和检测虚假信息的模型、打击虚假内容和加强核实机制的建议、关于社交媒体在虚假信息传播中的作用的研究、在公众和记者中培养媒体素养的努力、事实核查人员的案例研究、对影响相信虚假新闻的因素的识别,以及对虚假信息、核实、政治和民主之间关系的分析。结论是,必须开展将学术界与业界联系起来的研究,以提高媒体领域不同参与者对解决这些问题必要性的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信