Production and use of dry-rolled hybrid rye grain as a replacement for barley grain on growth performance and carcass quality of feedlot steers

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Fuquan Zhang, R. E. Carey, Rebecca S. Brattain, Herman Wehrle, G. B. Penner
{"title":"Production and use of dry-rolled hybrid rye grain as a replacement for barley grain on growth performance and carcass quality of feedlot steers","authors":"Fuquan Zhang, R. E. Carey, Rebecca S. Brattain, Herman Wehrle, G. B. Penner","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objectives were to compare cereal grain and straw yield between barley and hybrid rye (HR), and to evaluate whether the inclusion of dry-rolled HR grain as a replacement for barley grain affected feed intake and growth for growing cattle, and feed intake, growth, and carcass characteristics for finishing cattle. Crop yield was measured by directly weighing harvested grain and straw bales (n=3 plots/grain type). Three-hundred sixty steers with an initial body weight (BW) of 348 ± 40 kg were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 24 pens during the growing phase (n=8; 65 d). The control diet (BCON) included 60.22% barley grain with HR included by replacing 50 (BMID) or 100% (BHIGH) of the barley grain on a dry matter (DM) basis. Steers were re-randomized for the finishing phase (n=6; 118 d) and treatments included a control diet containing 88.60% barley grain (FCON) with HR replacing 33 (FLOW), 67 (FMED), or 100% (FHIGH) of the barley grain (DM basis). The grain yield was greater (P = 0.04) and straw yield tended (P = 0.06) to be less for HR than barley. There were no effects of HR inclusion on DM intake (DMI) or G:F during the growing phase, but ADG responded quadratically (P = 0.02) with cattle fed 50% HR having the greatest gain. During finishing, DMI decreased linearly as HR grain inclusion increased (P < 0.01). Average daily gain initially increased from FCON to FLOW followed by a decrease with increasing HR inclusion (quadratic, P < 0.01), but G:F was not affected. Hot carcass weight was greatest for FCON with the magnitude of difference between FCON and the HR treatments increasing with increasing inclusion of HR (quadratic, P = 0.02). There was a linear increase in dressing percentage (P = 0.02) and a linear reduction in back fat thickness (P = 0.04) with increasing inclusion of HR. Increasing the inclusion of HR during finishing cubically (P < 0.01) affected the proportion of minor and severe liver abscesses with an average of 34.60% severely abscessed livers when HR was included compared to 11.11% for BCON. Hybrid rye may have greater grain yield than barley, and partial replacement of barley grain with HR may improve ADG without affecting DMI or G:F during the growing phase. However, replacing barley grain in finishing diets with HR decreases DMI, increases risk minor and severe liver abscesses, but does not affect feed conversion, suggesting HR should not replace more than 33% of the barley grain to maintain ADG.","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives were to compare cereal grain and straw yield between barley and hybrid rye (HR), and to evaluate whether the inclusion of dry-rolled HR grain as a replacement for barley grain affected feed intake and growth for growing cattle, and feed intake, growth, and carcass characteristics for finishing cattle. Crop yield was measured by directly weighing harvested grain and straw bales (n=3 plots/grain type). Three-hundred sixty steers with an initial body weight (BW) of 348 ± 40 kg were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 24 pens during the growing phase (n=8; 65 d). The control diet (BCON) included 60.22% barley grain with HR included by replacing 50 (BMID) or 100% (BHIGH) of the barley grain on a dry matter (DM) basis. Steers were re-randomized for the finishing phase (n=6; 118 d) and treatments included a control diet containing 88.60% barley grain (FCON) with HR replacing 33 (FLOW), 67 (FMED), or 100% (FHIGH) of the barley grain (DM basis). The grain yield was greater (P = 0.04) and straw yield tended (P = 0.06) to be less for HR than barley. There were no effects of HR inclusion on DM intake (DMI) or G:F during the growing phase, but ADG responded quadratically (P = 0.02) with cattle fed 50% HR having the greatest gain. During finishing, DMI decreased linearly as HR grain inclusion increased (P < 0.01). Average daily gain initially increased from FCON to FLOW followed by a decrease with increasing HR inclusion (quadratic, P < 0.01), but G:F was not affected. Hot carcass weight was greatest for FCON with the magnitude of difference between FCON and the HR treatments increasing with increasing inclusion of HR (quadratic, P = 0.02). There was a linear increase in dressing percentage (P = 0.02) and a linear reduction in back fat thickness (P = 0.04) with increasing inclusion of HR. Increasing the inclusion of HR during finishing cubically (P < 0.01) affected the proportion of minor and severe liver abscesses with an average of 34.60% severely abscessed livers when HR was included compared to 11.11% for BCON. Hybrid rye may have greater grain yield than barley, and partial replacement of barley grain with HR may improve ADG without affecting DMI or G:F during the growing phase. However, replacing barley grain in finishing diets with HR decreases DMI, increases risk minor and severe liver abscesses, but does not affect feed conversion, suggesting HR should not replace more than 33% of the barley grain to maintain ADG.
生产和使用干轧杂交黑麦谷粒替代大麦谷粒对饲养场阉牛生长性能和胴体质量的影响
目的是比较大麦和杂交黑麦(HR)的谷物和秸秆产量,并评估用干轧 HR 谷物替代大麦谷物是否会影响生长牛的采食量和生长,以及育成牛的采食量、生长和胴体特征。作物产量是通过直接称量收获的谷物和稻草包(n=3 个小区/谷物类型)来测量的。三百六十头初始体重(BW)为 348 ± 40 千克的阉牛按体重分层,并在生长阶段随机分配到 24 个牛栏中的 1 个(n=8;65 d)。对照日粮(BCON)包括 60.22% 的大麦谷物,HR 取代了 50% (BMID)或 100% (BHIGH)的大麦谷物干物质(DM)。阉牛在育成期(n=6;118 d)被重新随机分组,处理包括含 88.60% 大麦谷粒的对照日粮(FCON),HR 取代 33(FLOW)、67(FMED)或 100%(FHIGH)的大麦谷粒(DM 基础)。与大麦相比,HR 的谷物产量更高(P = 0.04),秸秆产量往往更低(P = 0.06)。在生长阶段,添加 HR 对 DM 摄入量(DMI)或 G:F 没有影响,但 ADG 呈二次方反应(P = 0.02),饲喂 50% HR 的牛增重最大。在育成期,随着 HR 谷物添加量的增加,DMI 呈线性下降(P < 0.01)。平均日增重最初从 FCON 增加到 FLOW,然后随着 HR 含量的增加而降低(二次方,P < 0.01),但 G:F 不受影响。FCON的热胴体重最大,FCON与HR处理之间的差异幅度随着HR添加量的增加而增大(二次方,P = 0.02)。随着添加 HR 的增加,拌料百分比呈线性增加(P = 0.02),背脂厚度呈线性减少(P = 0.04)。在育成期立方体中增加 HR 的添加量(P < 0.01)会影响轻微和严重肝脓肿的比例,当添加 HR 时,严重肝脓肿的平均比例为 34.60%,而添加 BCON 时为 11.11%。杂交黑麦的谷物产量可能高于大麦,用 HR 部分替代大麦谷物可能会提高 ADG,而不会影响生长阶段的 DMI 或 G:F。然而,在育成日粮中用 HR 替代大麦粒会降低 DMI,增加轻微和严重肝脓肿的风险,但不会影响饲料转化率,这表明 HR 替代大麦粒的比例不应超过 33%,以维持 ADG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信