Assessment of fitting methods and variability of IVIM parameters in muscles of the lumbar spine at rest

Erin K. Englund, David B. Berry, John J. Behun, Lawrence R. Frank, Samuel R. Ward, Bahar Shahidi
{"title":"Assessment of fitting methods and variability of IVIM parameters in muscles of the lumbar spine at rest","authors":"Erin K. Englund, David B. Berry, John J. Behun, Lawrence R. Frank, Samuel R. Ward, Bahar Shahidi","doi":"10.3389/fmscd.2024.1386276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI provides insight into tissue diffusion and perfusion. Here, estimates of perfusion fraction (f), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and diffusion coefficient (D) obtained via different fitting methods are compared to ascertain (1) the optimal analysis strategy for muscles of the lumbar spine and (2) repeatability of IVIM parameters in skeletal muscle at rest. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired in the lumbar spine at rest in 15 healthy participants. Data were fit to the bi-exponential IVIM model to estimate f, D* and D using three variably segmented approaches based on non-linear least squares fitting, and a Bayesian fitting method. Assuming that perfusion and diffusion are temporally stable in skeletal muscle at rest, and spatially uniform within a spinal segment, the optimal analysis strategy was determined as the approach with the lowest temporal or spatial variation and smallest residual between measured and fit data. Inter-session repeatability of IVIM parameters was evaluated in a subset of 11 people. Finally, simulated IVIM signal at varying signal to noise ratio were evaluated to understand precision and bias. Experimental results showed that IVIM parameter values differed depending on the fitting method. A three-step non-linear least squares fitting approach, where D, f, and D* were estimated sequentially, generally yielded the lowest spatial and temporal variation. Solving all parameters simultaneously yielded the lowest residual between measured and fit data, however there was substantial spatial and temporal variability. Results obtained by Bayesian fitting had high spatial and temporal variability in addition to a large residual between measured and fit data. Simulations showed that all fitting methods can fit the IVIM data at signal to noise ratios >35, and that D* was the most challenging to accurately obtain. Overall, this study motivates use of a three-step non-linear least squares fitting strategy to quantify IVIM parameters in skeletal muscle.","PeriodicalId":507589,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmscd.2024.1386276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI provides insight into tissue diffusion and perfusion. Here, estimates of perfusion fraction (f), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and diffusion coefficient (D) obtained via different fitting methods are compared to ascertain (1) the optimal analysis strategy for muscles of the lumbar spine and (2) repeatability of IVIM parameters in skeletal muscle at rest. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired in the lumbar spine at rest in 15 healthy participants. Data were fit to the bi-exponential IVIM model to estimate f, D* and D using three variably segmented approaches based on non-linear least squares fitting, and a Bayesian fitting method. Assuming that perfusion and diffusion are temporally stable in skeletal muscle at rest, and spatially uniform within a spinal segment, the optimal analysis strategy was determined as the approach with the lowest temporal or spatial variation and smallest residual between measured and fit data. Inter-session repeatability of IVIM parameters was evaluated in a subset of 11 people. Finally, simulated IVIM signal at varying signal to noise ratio were evaluated to understand precision and bias. Experimental results showed that IVIM parameter values differed depending on the fitting method. A three-step non-linear least squares fitting approach, where D, f, and D* were estimated sequentially, generally yielded the lowest spatial and temporal variation. Solving all parameters simultaneously yielded the lowest residual between measured and fit data, however there was substantial spatial and temporal variability. Results obtained by Bayesian fitting had high spatial and temporal variability in addition to a large residual between measured and fit data. Simulations showed that all fitting methods can fit the IVIM data at signal to noise ratios >35, and that D* was the most challenging to accurately obtain. Overall, this study motivates use of a three-step non-linear least squares fitting strategy to quantify IVIM parameters in skeletal muscle.
评估拟合方法和静态腰椎肌肉 IVIM 参数的可变性
体细胞内非相干运动(IVIM)核磁共振成像(MRI)有助于深入了解组织的弥散和灌注情况。本文比较了通过不同拟合方法获得的灌注分数(f)、伪扩散系数(D*)和扩散系数(D)的估计值,以确定(1)腰椎肌肉的最佳分析策略和(2)静息状态下骨骼肌中 IVIM 参数的可重复性。研究人员采集了 15 名健康参与者静止时腰椎的扩散加权图像。使用基于非线性最小二乘法拟合的三种可变分段方法和贝叶斯拟合方法,将数据拟合到双指数 IVIM 模型,以估计 f、D* 和 D。假定骨骼肌在静止状态下的灌注和扩散在时间上是稳定的,在脊柱节段内的空间上是均匀的,最佳分析策略被确定为时间或空间变化最小、测量数据与拟合数据之间的残差最小的方法。对 11 人的子集进行了 IVIM 参数的会话间重复性评估。最后,对不同信噪比的模拟 IVIM 信号进行了评估,以了解精度和偏差。实验结果表明,IVIM 参数值因拟合方法的不同而不同。三步非线性最小二乘法拟合方法(D、f 和 D* 依次估算)通常能产生最小的空间和时间变化。同时求解所有参数可使测量数据与拟合数据之间的残差最小,但仍存在很大的时空差异。贝叶斯拟合法得到的结果除了测量数据与拟合数据之间的残差较大外,时空变异性也很高。模拟显示,所有拟合方法都能在信噪比大于 35 时拟合 IVIM 数据,而 D* 是最难准确获得的。总之,这项研究鼓励使用三步非线性最小二乘法拟合策略来量化骨骼肌中的 IVIM 参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信