Efficient word segmentation is preserved in older adult readers: Evidence from eye movements during Chinese reading.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Lin Li, Lingshan Bao, Zhuoer Li, Sha Li, Jingyi Liu, Pin Wang, Kayleigh L. Warrington, Sarah C. Gunn, K. Paterson
{"title":"Efficient word segmentation is preserved in older adult readers: Evidence from eye movements during Chinese reading.","authors":"Lin Li, Lingshan Bao, Zhuoer Li, Sha Li, Jingyi Liu, Pin Wang, Kayleigh L. Warrington, Sarah C. Gunn, K. Paterson","doi":"10.1037/pag0000813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"College-aged readers use efficient strategies to segment and recognize words in naturally unspaced Chinese text. Whether this capability changes across the adult lifespan is unknown, although segmenting words in unspaced text may be challenging for older readers due to visual and cognitive declines in older age, including poorer parafoveal processing of upcoming characters. Accordingly, we conducted two eye movement experiments to test for age differences in word segmentation, each with 48 young (18-30 years) and 36 older (65+ years) native Chinese readers. Following Zhou and Li (2021), we focused on the processing of \"incremental\" three-character words, like (meaning \"kindergartens\"), which contain an embedded two-character word (e.g., , meaning \"children\"). In Experiment 1, either the three-character word or its embedded word was presented as the target word in sentence contexts where the three-character word always was plausible, and the embedded word was either plausible or implausible. Both age groups produced similar plausibility effects, suggesting age constancy in accessing the embedded word early during ambiguity processing before ultimately assigning an incremental word analysis. Experiment 2 provided further evidence that both younger and older readers access the embedded word early during ambiguity processing, but rapidly select the appropriate (incremental) word. Crucially, the findings suggest that word segmentation strategies do not differ with age. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

College-aged readers use efficient strategies to segment and recognize words in naturally unspaced Chinese text. Whether this capability changes across the adult lifespan is unknown, although segmenting words in unspaced text may be challenging for older readers due to visual and cognitive declines in older age, including poorer parafoveal processing of upcoming characters. Accordingly, we conducted two eye movement experiments to test for age differences in word segmentation, each with 48 young (18-30 years) and 36 older (65+ years) native Chinese readers. Following Zhou and Li (2021), we focused on the processing of "incremental" three-character words, like (meaning "kindergartens"), which contain an embedded two-character word (e.g., , meaning "children"). In Experiment 1, either the three-character word or its embedded word was presented as the target word in sentence contexts where the three-character word always was plausible, and the embedded word was either plausible or implausible. Both age groups produced similar plausibility effects, suggesting age constancy in accessing the embedded word early during ambiguity processing before ultimately assigning an incremental word analysis. Experiment 2 provided further evidence that both younger and older readers access the embedded word early during ambiguity processing, but rapidly select the appropriate (incremental) word. Crucially, the findings suggest that word segmentation strategies do not differ with age. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
老年读者仍能保持高效的分词能力:中文阅读时眼球运动的证据
大学年龄段的读者使用高效的策略来分割和识别自然无间隔中文文本中的单词。这种能力是否会在成年人的一生中发生变化尚不清楚,不过,由于老年人的视觉和认知能力下降,包括对即将出现的字符的视网膜旁处理能力较差,在无间隔文本中分词对老年读者来说可能具有挑战性。因此,我们进行了两项眼动实验,分别测试 48 名年轻(18-30 岁)和 36 名老年(65 岁以上)母语为中文的读者在分词方面的年龄差异。按照周和李的研究(2021 年),我们重点研究了对 "递增 "三字词的处理,如(意为 "幼儿园"),其中包含一个嵌入的两字词(如 ,意为 "孩子")。在实验 1 中,三字词或其嵌入词在句子语境中作为目标词出现,其中三字词总是可信的,而嵌入词要么可信要么不可信。两个年龄组都产生了相似的可信度效应,这表明在模糊处理过程中,在最终进行增量词分析之前,早期进入嵌入词的年龄是一致的。实验 2 提供了进一步的证据,证明年龄较小和年龄较大的读者都会在模棱两可处理过程中及早接触嵌入词,但很快就会选择适当的(增量)词。最重要的是,实验结果表明,单词分割策略并不因年龄而异。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信