The impact of regular aspirin use on aneurysm recanalization rates after endovascular coiling.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Basel Musmar, Samantha Spellicy, Jihad Abdelgadir, Steven Kraljic, Ali R. Zomorodi, David M. Hasan
{"title":"The impact of regular aspirin use on aneurysm recanalization rates after endovascular coiling.","authors":"Basel Musmar, Samantha Spellicy, Jihad Abdelgadir, Steven Kraljic, Ali R. Zomorodi, David M. Hasan","doi":"10.3171/2024.1.JNS232726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nIntracranial aneurysms (IAs) pose a significant health risk, often leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage and severe neurological outcomes. Endovascular coiling has been a principal treatment method, but it comes with the challenge of high recanalization rates. Aspirin has recently emerged as a potential agent to reduce these rates. In this study, the authors aimed to investigate the impact of regular aspirin use on aneurysm recanalization rates following endovascular coiling in a 10-year single-institution study.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective analysis was conducted on a dataset of 2236 aneurysms treated by a single neurosurgeon over a period of 10 years. The primary outcome measure was aneurysm recanalization, defined by a change in the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification of at least one grade.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 525 aneurysms were coiled, 109 of which involved patients who reported regular use of aspirin. The recanalization rate was significantly lower in the aspirin group (9.2%) compared with the control group (23.6%) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.66; p = 0.001). On analysis of the specific mechanisms of recanalization, aneurysm sac growth was less frequent in the aspirin group (5.5%) compared with the control group (18%) (OR 0.265, 95% CI 0.09-0.63; p = 0.002). Additionally, patients in the control group had a higher retreatment rate (18%) than patients in the aspirin group (5.5%) (OR 0.265, 95% CI 0.09-0.63; p = 0.002).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nRegular use of aspirin appears to be associated with reduced rates of aneurysm recanalization after endovascular coiling. However, caution is advised in interpretation of these results given the retrospective nature of this study. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":"18 26","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.1.JNS232726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) pose a significant health risk, often leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage and severe neurological outcomes. Endovascular coiling has been a principal treatment method, but it comes with the challenge of high recanalization rates. Aspirin has recently emerged as a potential agent to reduce these rates. In this study, the authors aimed to investigate the impact of regular aspirin use on aneurysm recanalization rates following endovascular coiling in a 10-year single-institution study. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on a dataset of 2236 aneurysms treated by a single neurosurgeon over a period of 10 years. The primary outcome measure was aneurysm recanalization, defined by a change in the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification of at least one grade. RESULTS A total of 525 aneurysms were coiled, 109 of which involved patients who reported regular use of aspirin. The recanalization rate was significantly lower in the aspirin group (9.2%) compared with the control group (23.6%) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.66; p = 0.001). On analysis of the specific mechanisms of recanalization, aneurysm sac growth was less frequent in the aspirin group (5.5%) compared with the control group (18%) (OR 0.265, 95% CI 0.09-0.63; p = 0.002). Additionally, patients in the control group had a higher retreatment rate (18%) than patients in the aspirin group (5.5%) (OR 0.265, 95% CI 0.09-0.63; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Regular use of aspirin appears to be associated with reduced rates of aneurysm recanalization after endovascular coiling. However, caution is advised in interpretation of these results given the retrospective nature of this study. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
定期服用阿司匹林对血管内旋切术后动脉瘤再闭合率的影响。
目的颅内动脉瘤(IAs)对健康构成重大威胁,常常导致蛛网膜下腔出血和严重的神经系统后果。血管内旋转是一种主要的治疗方法,但它也面临着再通率高的挑战。最近,阿司匹林成为降低再通率的潜在药物。在这项研究中,作者旨在调查在一项为期 10 年的单一机构研究中,定期使用阿司匹林对血管内旋转术后动脉瘤再闭塞率的影响。方法对单一神经外科医生在 10 年内治疗的 2236 个动脉瘤数据集进行了回顾性分析。结果共有 525 个动脉瘤被夹闭,其中 109 例患者表示定期服用阿司匹林。阿司匹林组的再闭塞率(9.2%)明显低于对照组(23.6%)(OR 0.33,95% CI 0.15-0.66;P = 0.001)。在对再通的具体机制进行分析时,阿司匹林组(5.5%)与对照组(18%)相比,动脉瘤囊增生的发生率较低(OR 0.265,95% CI 0.09-0.63;P = 0.002)。此外,对照组患者的再治疗率(18%)高于阿司匹林组(5.5%)(OR 0.265,95% CI 0.09-0.63; p = 0.002)。然而,鉴于本研究的回顾性,在解释这些结果时应谨慎。需要进一步的随机对照试验来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric. Indexed/​Abstracted: Web of Science SCIE Scopus CAS INSPEC Portico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信