Defining a Relevant Market for Digitals Platforms: Theory and Regulatory Practice

P. A. Levakov
{"title":"Defining a Relevant Market for Digitals Platforms: Theory and Regulatory Practice","authors":"P. A. Levakov","doi":"10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-1-24-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On many markets digital platforms hold a dominant position, which requires an assessment of their actions from an antitrust point of view. To do this, it is necessary to assess the boundaries of the relevant market, which is associated with a number of methodological problems. Firstly, due to the presence of the phenomenon of zero prices, traditional methodology can produce incorrect results. Secondly, digital platforms function on multisided markets and thus it is required to define market boundaries for each group of agents.In this article theoretical approaches to assessing market boundaries for digital platforms and antitrust practice are considered. The paper dwells on the theoretical and methodological aspects of the definition of market boundaries for digital platforms and how these definitions turn into antitrust practices and influence the decisions made by regulatory authorities. The author argues that it's the market boundaries' definition that was the key influence on many antitrust proceedings against digital platforms. In addition, methodological approaches to determining market boundaries of Russian and foreign antimonopoly regulators are compared. Based on this analysis, an approach to determining market boundaries for digital platforms is proposed.","PeriodicalId":290417,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-1-24-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On many markets digital platforms hold a dominant position, which requires an assessment of their actions from an antitrust point of view. To do this, it is necessary to assess the boundaries of the relevant market, which is associated with a number of methodological problems. Firstly, due to the presence of the phenomenon of zero prices, traditional methodology can produce incorrect results. Secondly, digital platforms function on multisided markets and thus it is required to define market boundaries for each group of agents.In this article theoretical approaches to assessing market boundaries for digital platforms and antitrust practice are considered. The paper dwells on the theoretical and methodological aspects of the definition of market boundaries for digital platforms and how these definitions turn into antitrust practices and influence the decisions made by regulatory authorities. The author argues that it's the market boundaries' definition that was the key influence on many antitrust proceedings against digital platforms. In addition, methodological approaches to determining market boundaries of Russian and foreign antimonopoly regulators are compared. Based on this analysis, an approach to determining market boundaries for digital platforms is proposed.
界定数字平台的相关市场:理论与监管实践
在许多市场上,数字平台占据着支配地位,这就需要从反垄断的角度对其行为进行评估。为此,有必要对相关市场的边界进行评估,而这涉及到一些方法论问题。首先,由于零价格现象的存在,传统方法会产生不正确的结果。其次,数字平台在多方市场上发挥作用,因此需要为每一组代理界定市场边界。本文探讨了评估数字平台市场边界的理论方法和反垄断实践。本文探讨了数字平台市场边界定义的理论和方法,以及这些定义如何转化为反垄断实践并影响监管机构的决策。作者认为,市场边界的定义是许多针对数字平台的反垄断诉讼的关键影响因素。此外,作者还比较了俄罗斯和外国反垄断监管机构确定市场边界的方法。在此分析基础上,提出了确定数字平台市场边界的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信