ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) in German linguoculture

A. Khlopova
{"title":"ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) in German linguoculture","authors":"A. Khlopova","doi":"10.30853/phil20240163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aims to determine the psychologically relevant content of the value ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) in German linguoculture. The complexity in defining the content of this value primarily lies in its ambivalence. The research is novel in that it identifies factors indicating the transformation of the value and develops a methodology for determining the transformation of the value. The data obtained from lexicographical sources and an associative experiment are verified using the method of subjective scaling, ranking, and clarifying survey. As a result, it has been proven that the surveyed respondents do not perceive ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) as a value that should determine their behavior in society. Respondents equate decency with politeness and good behavior but do not associate the studied value with refraining from low acts and with honesty. The results indicate the lack of formation of the ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) value for the surveyed respondents.","PeriodicalId":508324,"journal":{"name":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research aims to determine the psychologically relevant content of the value ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) in German linguoculture. The complexity in defining the content of this value primarily lies in its ambivalence. The research is novel in that it identifies factors indicating the transformation of the value and develops a methodology for determining the transformation of the value. The data obtained from lexicographical sources and an associative experiment are verified using the method of subjective scaling, ranking, and clarifying survey. As a result, it has been proven that the surveyed respondents do not perceive ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) as a value that should determine their behavior in society. Respondents equate decency with politeness and good behavior but do not associate the studied value with refraining from low acts and with honesty. The results indicate the lack of formation of the ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) value for the surveyed respondents.
德语语言文化中的 "礼貌"(ANSTÄNDIGKEIT
本研究旨在确定德国语言文化中与心理相关的 ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY) 价值观的内容。确定该价值观内容的复杂性主要在于其矛盾性。这项研究的新颖之处在于,它确定了表明该价值观转变的因素,并制定了确定该价值观转变的方法。利用主观比例、排序和澄清调查的方法,对从词典来源和联想实验中获得的数据进行了验证。结果证明,受访者并不认为 "正派"(ANSTÄNDIGKEIT)是决定其社会行为的价值观。受访者将 "得体 "等同于礼貌和良好的行为举止,但没有将所研究的价值观与避免低级行为和诚实联系起来。结果表明,受访者没有形成 ANSTÄNDIGKEIT (DECENCY)价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信