Police responses to vulnerable populations: tracking the evolution from “zero-policing” to “co-responding”

Robert J. Kane, Jordan M. Hyatt, Matthew J. Teti
{"title":"Police responses to vulnerable populations: tracking the evolution from “zero-policing” to “co-responding”","authors":"Robert J. Kane, Jordan M. Hyatt, Matthew J. Teti","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-10-2023-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper examines the historical shifts in policing strategies towards individuals with SMI and vulnerable populations, highlighting the development of co-response models, introducing the concept of “untethered” co-response.Design/methodology/approachThis paper conducts a review of literature to trace the evolution of police responses to individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) and vulnerable populations. It categorizes four generations of police approaches—zero-policing, over-policing, crisis intervention and co-response—and introduces a fifth generation, the “untethered” co-response model exemplified by Project SCOPE in Philadelphia.FindingsThe review identifies historical patterns of police response to SMI individuals, emphasizing the challenges and consequences associated with over-policing. It outlines the evolution from crisis intervention teams to co-response models and introduces Project SCOPE as an innovative “untethered” co-response approach.Research limitations/implicationsThe research acknowledges the challenges in evaluating the effectiveness of crisis intervention teams and co-response models due to variations in implementation and limited standardized models. It emphasizes the need for more rigorous research, including randomized controlled trials, to substantiate claims about the effectiveness of these models.Practical implicationsThe paper suggests that the “untethered” co-response model, exemplified by Project SCOPE, has the potential to positively impact criminal justice and social service outcomes for vulnerable populations. It encourages ongoing policy and evaluative research to inform evidence-based practice and mitigate collateral harms associated with policing responses.Social implicationsGiven the rising interactions between police and individuals with mental health issues, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the paper highlights the urgency for innovative, non-policing-driven responses to vulnerable persons.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the literature by proposing a fifth generation of police response to vulnerable persons, the “untethered” co-response model and presenting Project SCOPE as a practical example.","PeriodicalId":512699,"journal":{"name":"Policing: An International Journal","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-10-2023-0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe paper examines the historical shifts in policing strategies towards individuals with SMI and vulnerable populations, highlighting the development of co-response models, introducing the concept of “untethered” co-response.Design/methodology/approachThis paper conducts a review of literature to trace the evolution of police responses to individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) and vulnerable populations. It categorizes four generations of police approaches—zero-policing, over-policing, crisis intervention and co-response—and introduces a fifth generation, the “untethered” co-response model exemplified by Project SCOPE in Philadelphia.FindingsThe review identifies historical patterns of police response to SMI individuals, emphasizing the challenges and consequences associated with over-policing. It outlines the evolution from crisis intervention teams to co-response models and introduces Project SCOPE as an innovative “untethered” co-response approach.Research limitations/implicationsThe research acknowledges the challenges in evaluating the effectiveness of crisis intervention teams and co-response models due to variations in implementation and limited standardized models. It emphasizes the need for more rigorous research, including randomized controlled trials, to substantiate claims about the effectiveness of these models.Practical implicationsThe paper suggests that the “untethered” co-response model, exemplified by Project SCOPE, has the potential to positively impact criminal justice and social service outcomes for vulnerable populations. It encourages ongoing policy and evaluative research to inform evidence-based practice and mitigate collateral harms associated with policing responses.Social implicationsGiven the rising interactions between police and individuals with mental health issues, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the paper highlights the urgency for innovative, non-policing-driven responses to vulnerable persons.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the literature by proposing a fifth generation of police response to vulnerable persons, the “untethered” co-response model and presenting Project SCOPE as a practical example.
警方对弱势群体的回应:追踪从 "零警务 "到 "共同回应 "的演变过程
设计/方法/途径 本文对文献进行了综述,以追溯警方对严重精神疾病(SMI)患者和弱势人群的应对措施的演变过程。本文对四代警方应对方式进行了分类--零警力应对、过度警力应对、危机干预和共同应对--并介绍了第五代应对方式,即费城 SCOPE 项目所体现的 "不受约束的 "共同应对模式。研究结果该综述确定了警方应对 SMI 患者的历史模式,强调了与过度警力应对相关的挑战和后果。研究局限性/影响研究承认,由于实施方式的不同和标准化模式的有限,在评估危机干预小组和共同应对模式的有效性方面存在挑战。实践意义本文认为,以 SCOPE 项目为代表的 "非捆绑式 "共同应对模式有可能对弱势人群的刑事司法和社会服务结果产生积极影响。社会影响鉴于警察与有精神健康问题的个人之间的互动日益增多,并因 COVID-19 的流行而加剧,本文强调了对弱势人群采取创新的、非警察驱动的应对措施的紧迫性。原创性/价值本文提出了第五代警察应对弱势人群的措施,即 "无拘束 "共同应对模式,并将 SCOPE 项目作为实践范例进行了介绍,为相关文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信