Analysis of the costs of teleconsultation for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in the SUS

F. Padilha, Daniela Laranja Gomes Rodrigues, Gisele Silvestre Belber, Marcos Aurélio Maeyama, L. Spinel, Ana Paula Neves Marques Pinho, Alessandra Vitti, Mariana Selbach Otero, Greta Barriquel Pompermaier, Tanise Balvedi Damas, Haliton Oliveira
{"title":"Analysis of the costs of teleconsultation for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in the SUS","authors":"F. Padilha, Daniela Laranja Gomes Rodrigues, Gisele Silvestre Belber, Marcos Aurélio Maeyama, L. Spinel, Ana Paula Neves Marques Pinho, Alessandra Vitti, Mariana Selbach Otero, Greta Barriquel Pompermaier, Tanise Balvedi Damas, Haliton Oliveira","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To present the results of a cost analysis of remote consultations (teleconsultations) compared to in-person consultations for patients with type 2 diabetes, in the Brazilian public healthcare system (SUS) in the city of Joinville, Santa Catarina (SC). In addition to the costs from the local manager’s perspective, the article also presents estimates from the patient’s perspective, based on the transportation costs associated with each type of consultation. METHOD Data were collected from 246 consultations, both remote and in-person, between 2021 and 2023, in the context of a randomized clinical trial on the impact of teleconsultation carried out in the city of Joinville, SC. Teleconsultations were carried out at Primary Health Units (PHU) and in-person consultations at the Specialized Health Center. The consultation costs were calculate by the method time and activity-based costing (TDABC), and for the estimate of transportation costs data was collected directly from the research participants . The mean costs and time required to carry out each type of consultation in different scenarios and perspectives were analyzed and compared descriptively. RESULTS Considering only the local SUS manager’s perspective, the costs for carrying out a teleconsultation were 4.5% higher than for an in-person consultation. However, when considering the transportation costs associated with each patient, the estimated value of the in-person consultation becomes 7.7% higher and, in the case of consultations in other municipalities, 15% higher than the teleconsultation. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate that the incorporation of teleconsultation within the SUS can bring economic advantages depending on the perspective and scenario considered, in addition to being a strategy with the potential to increase access to specialized care in the public network.","PeriodicalId":503270,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Saúde Pública","volume":"64 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Saúde Pública","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To present the results of a cost analysis of remote consultations (teleconsultations) compared to in-person consultations for patients with type 2 diabetes, in the Brazilian public healthcare system (SUS) in the city of Joinville, Santa Catarina (SC). In addition to the costs from the local manager’s perspective, the article also presents estimates from the patient’s perspective, based on the transportation costs associated with each type of consultation. METHOD Data were collected from 246 consultations, both remote and in-person, between 2021 and 2023, in the context of a randomized clinical trial on the impact of teleconsultation carried out in the city of Joinville, SC. Teleconsultations were carried out at Primary Health Units (PHU) and in-person consultations at the Specialized Health Center. The consultation costs were calculate by the method time and activity-based costing (TDABC), and for the estimate of transportation costs data was collected directly from the research participants . The mean costs and time required to carry out each type of consultation in different scenarios and perspectives were analyzed and compared descriptively. RESULTS Considering only the local SUS manager’s perspective, the costs for carrying out a teleconsultation were 4.5% higher than for an in-person consultation. However, when considering the transportation costs associated with each patient, the estimated value of the in-person consultation becomes 7.7% higher and, in the case of consultations in other municipalities, 15% higher than the teleconsultation. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate that the incorporation of teleconsultation within the SUS can bring economic advantages depending on the perspective and scenario considered, in addition to being a strategy with the potential to increase access to specialized care in the public network.
统一卫生系统远程会诊治疗糖尿病的成本分析
摘要 目的 介绍巴西圣卡塔琳娜州 Joinville 市公共医疗系统(SUS)对 2 型糖尿病患者进行远程会诊(远程会诊)与面对面会诊的成本分析结果。除了从当地管理者的角度估算成本外,文章还从患者的角度,根据与每种问诊方式相关的交通成本进行了估算。方法 收集了 2021 年至 2023 年间 246 次远程和面对面会诊的数据,这是一项在南卡罗来纳州儒安维尔市开展的关于远程会诊影响的随机临床试验。远程会诊在初级保健单位(PHU)进行,现场会诊在专业保健中心进行。会诊成本采用基于时间和活动的成本计算法(TDABC)计算,交通成本的估算直接从研究参与者处收集数据。对在不同情况和角度下进行各类咨询所需的平均成本和时间进行了描述性分析和比较。结果 仅从当地统一卫生系统管理者的角度考虑,开展远程会诊的成本比面对面会诊高出 4.5%。然而,如果考虑到与每位患者相关的交通费用,则当面会诊的估计价值比远程会诊高出 7.7%,如果是在其他城市会诊,则比远程会诊高出 15%。结论 研究结果表明,将远程会诊纳入统一卫生系统可以带来经济效益,这取决于所考虑的角度和情况,此外,远程会诊还是一项有可能增加公共网络中专业医疗服务的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信