Social Quality Management in the Lens of Philosophy and Methodology of Science

A. V. Mayakova
{"title":"Social Quality Management in the Lens of Philosophy and Methodology of Science","authors":"A. V. Mayakova","doi":"10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-1-246-257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Quality problems have been relevant for many centuries. At the same time, quality is viewed from the perspective of various sciences and industries indirectly: as a category identified with any sphere. Quality management is also of interest to many scientists and specialists, but most often in the technical or economic sphere. At the same time, its social aspect is obvious. Moreover, in the context of social management (social) quality management is an effective tool aimed at ensuring and improving the quality of life. However, despite the widespread application and adaptation of (social) quality management in various fields of science and practice, philosophical understanding is presented quite selectively. In this regard, in this study, it is advisable to present social quality management from the perspective of philosophy and methodology of science.Purpose. In the work, the author sets himself the purpose of conducting a comprehensive analysis of social quality management from a philosophical and methodological perspective.Objectives. To achieve this goal, it is relevant to solve the following tasks: analysis of social quality management as a post-non-classical concept of the philosophy of complexity; assessment and interpretation of social quality management in a broad plane of humanitarianism; attempt to define the philosophical understanding of social quality management.Methodology. To achieve this goal, the author uses in his work such methods and methodologies as the theory of complexity (complexity), the semiotic-digital dimension, and the methodology for constructing sociotechnical landscapes of digital reality. Results. The paper presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of social quality management from a philosophical and methodological perspective.Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, the author's understanding of social quality management in a philosophical and methodological context is substantiated; social quality management is presented as a concept of the complexity paradigm; the interrelationships of social quality management and the sociotechnical landscape of digital reality in a single field of modern humanities are established.","PeriodicalId":425065,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management","volume":"100 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-1-246-257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. Quality problems have been relevant for many centuries. At the same time, quality is viewed from the perspective of various sciences and industries indirectly: as a category identified with any sphere. Quality management is also of interest to many scientists and specialists, but most often in the technical or economic sphere. At the same time, its social aspect is obvious. Moreover, in the context of social management (social) quality management is an effective tool aimed at ensuring and improving the quality of life. However, despite the widespread application and adaptation of (social) quality management in various fields of science and practice, philosophical understanding is presented quite selectively. In this regard, in this study, it is advisable to present social quality management from the perspective of philosophy and methodology of science.Purpose. In the work, the author sets himself the purpose of conducting a comprehensive analysis of social quality management from a philosophical and methodological perspective.Objectives. To achieve this goal, it is relevant to solve the following tasks: analysis of social quality management as a post-non-classical concept of the philosophy of complexity; assessment and interpretation of social quality management in a broad plane of humanitarianism; attempt to define the philosophical understanding of social quality management.Methodology. To achieve this goal, the author uses in his work such methods and methodologies as the theory of complexity (complexity), the semiotic-digital dimension, and the methodology for constructing sociotechnical landscapes of digital reality. Results. The paper presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of social quality management from a philosophical and methodological perspective.Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, the author's understanding of social quality management in a philosophical and methodological context is substantiated; social quality management is presented as a concept of the complexity paradigm; the interrelationships of social quality management and the sociotechnical landscape of digital reality in a single field of modern humanities are established.
科学哲学和方法论视角下的社会质量管理
相关性。几个世纪以来,质量问题一直与我们息息相关。同时,从各种科学和行业的角度来看,质量也是间接的:是与任何领域相联系的一个类别。许多科学家和专家也对质量管理感兴趣,但最常见的是在技术或经济领域。同时,其社会方面也是显而易见的。此外,在社会管理(社会)方面,质量管理是确保和提高生活质量的有效工具。然而,尽管(社会)质量管理在各个科学和实践领域得到了广泛的应用和调整,但对其哲学理解的介绍却很有选择性。因此,在本研究中,从科学哲学和科学方法论的角度介绍社会质量管理是可取的。在这项工作中,作者为自己设定了一个目标,即从哲学和方法论的角度对社会质量管理进行全面分析。为了实现这一目标,有必要解决以下任务:将社会质量管理作为复杂性哲学的后非经典概念进行分析;从人道主义的广义层面对社会质量管理进行评估和解释;尝试从哲学角度界定对社会质量管理的理解。为了实现这一目标,作者在工作中使用了复杂性理论(复杂性)、符号学-数字维度以及构建数字现实社会技术景观的方法论等方法和方法论。成果。本文介绍了从哲学和方法论角度对社会质量管理进行综合分析的结果。在研究成果的基础上,作者从哲学和方法论的角度对社会质量管理的理解得到了证实;社会质量管理作为复杂性范式的一个概念得到了阐述;在现代人文科学的单一领域中,社会质量管理与数字现实的社会技术景观的相互关系得到了确立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信