Virtual Care: Perspectives From Family Physicians.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Olivia Ritchie, Emily Koptyra, Liz B Marquis, Reema Kadri, Anna R. Laurie, V. G. V. Vydiswaran, Jiazhao Li, Lindsay K. Brown, Tiffany C. Veinot, Lorraine R. Buis, T. Guetterman
{"title":"Virtual Care: Perspectives From Family Physicians.","authors":"Olivia Ritchie, Emily Koptyra, Liz B Marquis, Reema Kadri, Anna R. Laurie, V. G. V. Vydiswaran, Jiazhao Li, Lindsay K. Brown, Tiffany C. Veinot, Lorraine R. Buis, T. Guetterman","doi":"10.22454/fammed.2024.592756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care expanded rapidly at Michigan Medicine and other health systems. From family physicians' perspectives, this shift to virtual care has the potential to affect workflow, job satisfaction, and patient communication. As clinics reopened and care delivery models shifted to a combination of in-person and virtual care, the need to understand physician experiences with virtual care arose in order to improve both patient and provider experiences. This study investigated Michigan Medicine family medicine physicians' perceptions of virtual care through qualitative interviews to better understand how to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care for both patients and physicians.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe employed a qualitative descriptive design to examine physician perspectives through semistructured interviews. We coded and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis, facilitated by MAXQDA (VERBI) software.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe results of the analysis identified four major themes: (a) chief concerns that are appropriate for virtual evaluation, (b) physician perceptions of patient benefits, (c) focused but contextually enriched patient-physician communication, and (d) structural support needed for high-quality virtual care.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThese findings can help further direct the discussion of how to make use of resources to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care.","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2024.592756","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care expanded rapidly at Michigan Medicine and other health systems. From family physicians' perspectives, this shift to virtual care has the potential to affect workflow, job satisfaction, and patient communication. As clinics reopened and care delivery models shifted to a combination of in-person and virtual care, the need to understand physician experiences with virtual care arose in order to improve both patient and provider experiences. This study investigated Michigan Medicine family medicine physicians' perceptions of virtual care through qualitative interviews to better understand how to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care for both patients and physicians. METHODS We employed a qualitative descriptive design to examine physician perspectives through semistructured interviews. We coded and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis, facilitated by MAXQDA (VERBI) software. RESULTS The results of the analysis identified four major themes: (a) chief concerns that are appropriate for virtual evaluation, (b) physician perceptions of patient benefits, (c) focused but contextually enriched patient-physician communication, and (d) structural support needed for high-quality virtual care. CONCLUSIONS These findings can help further direct the discussion of how to make use of resources to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care.
虚拟医疗:家庭医生的观点。
背景在 COVID-19 大流行期间,密歇根医学院和其他医疗系统的虚拟医疗迅速发展。从家庭医生的角度来看,向虚拟医疗的转变有可能影响工作流程、工作满意度和患者沟通。随着诊所的重新开业和医疗服务模式向现场和虚拟医疗相结合的方向转变,为了改善患者和医疗服务提供者的体验,需要了解医生对虚拟医疗的体验。本研究通过定性访谈调查了密歇根医学院家庭医生对虚拟医疗的看法,以更好地了解如何为患者和医生提高虚拟医疗的质量和有效性。结果分析结果确定了四大主题:(a) 适合虚拟评估的主要关注点,(b) 医生对患者获益的看法,(c) 重点突出但背景丰富的医患沟通,(d) 高质量虚拟医疗所需的结构性支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信