Outcomes of Patients with Normal LDL-Cholesterol at Admission for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Lower Is Not Always Better.

I. Jurin, A. Jurišić, I. Rudež, Ena Kurtić, Ivana Škorić, Tomislav Čikara, Tomislav Šipić, D. Rudan, Š. Manola, I. Hadžibegović
{"title":"Outcomes of Patients with Normal LDL-Cholesterol at Admission for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Lower Is Not Always Better.","authors":"I. Jurin, A. Jurišić, I. Rudež, Ena Kurtić, Ivana Škorić, Tomislav Čikara, Tomislav Šipić, D. Rudan, Š. Manola, I. Hadžibegović","doi":"10.3390/jcdd11040120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIM\nThere are few prospective data on the prognostic value of normal admission low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in statin-naïve patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who are treated with a preemptive invasive strategy. We aimed to analyze the proportion of patients with normal LDL-C at admission for ACS in our practice, and their characteristics and clinical outcomes in comparison to patients with high admission LDL-C.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nTwo institutions' prospective registries of patients with confirmed ACS from Jan 2017 to Jan 2023 were used to identify 1579 statin-naïve patients with no history of prior coronary artery disease (CAD), and with available LDL-C admission results, relevant clinical and procedural data, and short- and long-term follow-up data. Normal LDL-C at admission was defined as lower than 2.6 mmol/L. All demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were compared between patients with normal LDL-C and patients with a high LDL-C level (≥2.6 mmol/L) at admission.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were 242 (15%) patients with normal LDL-C at admission. In comparison to patients with high LDL-cholesterol at admission, they were significantly older (median 67 vs. 62 years) with worse renal function, had significantly more cases of diabetes mellitus (DM) (26% vs. 17%), peripheral artery disease (PAD) (14% vs. 9%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (8% vs. 2%), and psychological disorders requiring medical attention (19% vs. 10%). There were no significant differences in clinical type of ACS. Complexity of CAD estimated by coronary angiography was similar between the two groups (median Syntax score 12 for both groups). There were no significant differences in rates of complete revascularization (67% vs. 72%). Patients with normal LDL-C had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at discharge (median LVEF 52% vs. 55%). Patients with normal LDL-C at admission had both significantly higher in-hospital mortality (5% vs. 2%, RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.08-3.96) and overall mortality during a median follow-up of 43 months (27% vs. 14%, RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.45-2.37). After adjusting for age, renal function, presence of diabetes mellitus, PAD, COPD, psychological disorders, BMI, and LVEF at discharge in a multivariate Cox regression analysis, normal LDL-C at admission remained significantly and independently associated with higher long-term mortality during follow-up (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.05-2.09).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nA spontaneously normal LDL-C level at admission for ACS in statin-naïve patients was not rare and it was an independent risk factor for both substantially higher in-hospital mortality and mortality during long-term follow-up. Patients with normal LDL-C and otherwise high total cardiovascular risk scores should be detected early and treated with optimal medical therapy. However, additional research is needed to reveal all the missing pieces in their survival puzzle after ACS-beyond coronary anatomy, PCI optimization, numerical LDL-C levels, and statin therapy.","PeriodicalId":502527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"52 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11040120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM There are few prospective data on the prognostic value of normal admission low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in statin-naïve patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who are treated with a preemptive invasive strategy. We aimed to analyze the proportion of patients with normal LDL-C at admission for ACS in our practice, and their characteristics and clinical outcomes in comparison to patients with high admission LDL-C. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two institutions' prospective registries of patients with confirmed ACS from Jan 2017 to Jan 2023 were used to identify 1579 statin-naïve patients with no history of prior coronary artery disease (CAD), and with available LDL-C admission results, relevant clinical and procedural data, and short- and long-term follow-up data. Normal LDL-C at admission was defined as lower than 2.6 mmol/L. All demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were compared between patients with normal LDL-C and patients with a high LDL-C level (≥2.6 mmol/L) at admission. RESULTS There were 242 (15%) patients with normal LDL-C at admission. In comparison to patients with high LDL-cholesterol at admission, they were significantly older (median 67 vs. 62 years) with worse renal function, had significantly more cases of diabetes mellitus (DM) (26% vs. 17%), peripheral artery disease (PAD) (14% vs. 9%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (8% vs. 2%), and psychological disorders requiring medical attention (19% vs. 10%). There were no significant differences in clinical type of ACS. Complexity of CAD estimated by coronary angiography was similar between the two groups (median Syntax score 12 for both groups). There were no significant differences in rates of complete revascularization (67% vs. 72%). Patients with normal LDL-C had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at discharge (median LVEF 52% vs. 55%). Patients with normal LDL-C at admission had both significantly higher in-hospital mortality (5% vs. 2%, RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.08-3.96) and overall mortality during a median follow-up of 43 months (27% vs. 14%, RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.45-2.37). After adjusting for age, renal function, presence of diabetes mellitus, PAD, COPD, psychological disorders, BMI, and LVEF at discharge in a multivariate Cox regression analysis, normal LDL-C at admission remained significantly and independently associated with higher long-term mortality during follow-up (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.05-2.09). CONCLUSIONS A spontaneously normal LDL-C level at admission for ACS in statin-naïve patients was not rare and it was an independent risk factor for both substantially higher in-hospital mortality and mortality during long-term follow-up. Patients with normal LDL-C and otherwise high total cardiovascular risk scores should be detected early and treated with optimal medical therapy. However, additional research is needed to reveal all the missing pieces in their survival puzzle after ACS-beyond coronary anatomy, PCI optimization, numerical LDL-C levels, and statin therapy.
急性冠状动脉综合征入院时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇正常患者的预后:并非越低越好
背景和目的:对于他汀类药物无效并接受先期介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者,入院时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)正常的预后价值鲜有前瞻性数据。我们旨在分析在我们的临床实践中,入院时 LDL-C 正常的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者所占比例,以及他们与入院时 LDL-C 偏高的患者相比的特征和临床结局。入院时 LDL-C 正常的定义是低于 2.6 mmol/L。比较了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)正常患者和入院时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平较高(≥2.6 mmol/L)患者的所有人口统计学、临床、程序和随访数据。与入院时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇偏高的患者相比,他们的年龄明显偏大(中位数为 67 岁对 62 岁),肾功能较差,糖尿病(DM)(26% 对 17%)、外周动脉疾病(PAD)(14% 对 9%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)(8% 对 2%)和需要就医的心理障碍(19% 对 10%)的病例明显较多。ACS 的临床类型无明显差异。两组患者通过冠状动脉造影术估计的 CAD 复杂性相似(两组的 Syntax 评分中位数均为 12 分)。完全血管再通率无明显差异(67% 对 72%)。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)正常的患者出院时左心室射血分数(LVEF)明显较低(中位 LVEF 为 52% 对 55%)。入院时 LDL-C 正常的患者的院内死亡率(5% 对 2%,RR 2.07,95% CI 1.08-3.96)和中位随访 43 个月期间的总死亡率(27% 对 14%,RR 1.86,95% CI 1.45-2.37)都明显较高。在多变量 Cox 回归分析中对年龄、肾功能、是否患有糖尿病、PAD、COPD、心理障碍、体重指数和出院时 LVEF 进行调整后,入院时 LDL-C 正常仍与随访期间较高的长期死亡率显著且独立地相关(RR 1.结论他汀类药物无效的 ACS 患者入院时 LDL-C 水平自发正常并不罕见,它是院内死亡率和长期随访期间死亡率大幅升高的独立危险因素。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)正常但心血管总风险评分较高的患者应及早发现并接受最佳的药物治疗。然而,除了冠状动脉解剖、PCI 优化、LDL-C 数值水平和他汀类药物治疗外,还需要更多的研究来揭示他们在 ACS 后生存拼图中缺失的所有部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信