A Longitudinal Assessment of Resident and New Graduate Well-Being According to Length of Training: A Report From the Length of Training Pilot in Family Medicine.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mark A. Johnson, Patricia A. Carney, Annie Ericson, Briana Money, Suki Tepperberg, Nicholas Weida, Jennifer Somers, Jennifer Romeu
{"title":"A Longitudinal Assessment of Resident and New Graduate Well-Being According to Length of Training: A Report From the Length of Training Pilot in Family Medicine.","authors":"Mark A. Johnson, Patricia A. Carney, Annie Ericson, Briana Money, Suki Tepperberg, Nicholas Weida, Jennifer Somers, Jennifer Romeu","doi":"10.22454/fammed.2024.990826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objectives: No prior studies have examined how length of training may influence wellness. As part of the Length of Training Pilot (LoTP), we explored resident and new graduate well-being according to program year and length of training in 3- and 4-year family medicine residency training programs.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTwo surveys captured data included in these analyses. One was a resident survey that included the Mayo Clinic physician-expanded Well-Being Index (eWBI) administered annually during the In-Training Examination (2014-2019). The second was administered to graduates 1 year after completion of training between 2016 and 2022 and included the same well-being questions. Response rates ranged between 77.7% and 96.8%.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe eWBI summary scores for burnout were highest in postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) and did not differ statistically according to length of training (PGY1: 2.02 in 3-year [3YR] programs vs 1.93 in 4-year [4YR] programs, P=.55; postgraduate year 2 [PGY2]: 2.42 in 3YR programs vs 2.38 in 4YR programs, P=.83; postgraduate year 3 [PGY3]: 2.18 in 3YR programs vs 2.28 in 4YR programs, P=.59; and 2.34 in postgraduate year 4 [PGY4] for those in 4YR programs), though some statistical differences were noted for three items. New graduates' eWBI summary scores before the COVID-19 pandemic were 1.77 among 3YR graduates and 1.66 among 4YR graduates (P=.59). These scores were higher during COVID-19 at 1.89 for 3YR graduates and 2.02 for 4YR graduates (P=.62). Length of training was not associated with differences in well-being before or during COVID-19.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWe found no associations between length of training and physician well-being during training or among new graduates before or during COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2024.990826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Objectives: No prior studies have examined how length of training may influence wellness. As part of the Length of Training Pilot (LoTP), we explored resident and new graduate well-being according to program year and length of training in 3- and 4-year family medicine residency training programs. METHODS Two surveys captured data included in these analyses. One was a resident survey that included the Mayo Clinic physician-expanded Well-Being Index (eWBI) administered annually during the In-Training Examination (2014-2019). The second was administered to graduates 1 year after completion of training between 2016 and 2022 and included the same well-being questions. Response rates ranged between 77.7% and 96.8%. RESULTS The eWBI summary scores for burnout were highest in postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) and did not differ statistically according to length of training (PGY1: 2.02 in 3-year [3YR] programs vs 1.93 in 4-year [4YR] programs, P=.55; postgraduate year 2 [PGY2]: 2.42 in 3YR programs vs 2.38 in 4YR programs, P=.83; postgraduate year 3 [PGY3]: 2.18 in 3YR programs vs 2.28 in 4YR programs, P=.59; and 2.34 in postgraduate year 4 [PGY4] for those in 4YR programs), though some statistical differences were noted for three items. New graduates' eWBI summary scores before the COVID-19 pandemic were 1.77 among 3YR graduates and 1.66 among 4YR graduates (P=.59). These scores were higher during COVID-19 at 1.89 for 3YR graduates and 2.02 for 4YR graduates (P=.62). Length of training was not associated with differences in well-being before or during COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS We found no associations between length of training and physician well-being during training or among new graduates before or during COVID-19.
根据培训时间长短对住院医师和新毕业生幸福感的纵向评估:全科医学培训时间试验报告》。
背景与目标:以前没有研究探讨过培训时间的长短会如何影响健康。作为培训时间试验(LoTP)的一部分,我们根据三年制和四年制全科住院医师培训项目中的项目年份和培训时间,对住院医师和新毕业生的健康状况进行了调查。其中一项是住院医师调查,包括梅奥诊所医生扩展幸福指数(eWBI),每年在培训中考试(2014-2019 年)期间进行。第二项调查是在 2016 年至 2022 年期间对完成培训 1 年后的毕业生进行的,包括相同的幸福感问题。结果研究生1年级(PGY1)的职业倦怠eWBI总分最高,且与培训时间长短无统计学差异(PGY1:3年制[3YR]项目2.02 vs 4年制[4YR]项目1.93,P=.55;研究生二年级[PGY2]:3 年制[3YR]项目为 2.42,4 年制[4YR]项目为 2.38,P=.83;研究生三年级[PGY3]:3 年制[3YR]项目为 2.18,4 年制[4YR]项目为 2.28,P=.59;研究生四年级[PGY4]:4 年制[4YR]项目为 2.34),但有三个项目存在统计学差异。在 COVID-19 大流行之前,3 年制毕业生的 eWBI 总分为 1.77,4 年制毕业生为 1.66(P=.59)。在 COVID-19 期间,3 年制毕业生的得分更高,为 1.89,4 年制毕业生为 2.02(P=.62)。培训时间与 COVID-19 前或 COVID-19 期间的幸福感差异无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信